Granular technologies to accelerate decarbonization

Smaller, modular energy technologies have advantages Of the 45 energy technologies deemed critical by the International Energy Agency for meeting global climate targets, 38 need to improve substantially in cost and performance while accelerating deployment over the next decades (1). Low-carbon technological solutions vary in scale from solar panels, e-bikes, and smart thermostats to carbon capture and storage, light rail transit, and whole-building retrofits. We make three contributions to long-standing debates on the appropriate scale of technological responses in the energy system (2, 3). First, we focus on the specific needs of accelerated low-carbon transformation: rapid technology deployment, escaping lock-in, and social legitimacy. Second, we synthesize evidence on energy end-use technologies in homes, transport, and industry, as well as electricity generation and energy supply. Third, we go beyond technical and economic considerations to include innovation, investment, deployment, social, and equity criteria for assessing the relative advantage of alternative technologies as a function of their scale. We suggest numerous potential advantages of more-granular energy technologies for accelerating progress toward climate targets, as well as the conditions on which such progress depends.

[1]  Eleanor C. Stokes,et al.  Carbon Lock-In: Types, Causes, and Policy Implications , 2016 .

[2]  T. Gutowski,et al.  Industry 1.61803: the transition to an industry with reduced material demand fit for a low carbon future , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[3]  Robert Gross,et al.  Low carbon jobs: the evidence for net job creation from policy support for energy efficiency and renewable energy , 2014 .

[4]  Jessika E. Trancik,et al.  Evaluating the Causes of Cost Reduction in Photovoltaic Modules , 2017, Energy Policy.

[5]  J. Trancik,et al.  Historical Costs of Coal-Fired Electricity and Implications for the Future , 2009, 1001.0605.

[6]  E. Moe Renewable Energy Transformation or Fossil Fuel Backlash: Vested Interests in the Political Economy , 2015 .

[7]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  Decentralized energy systems for clean electricity access , 2015 .

[8]  Patrick Guette,et al.  THE IMPACT OF STANDARDIZATION AND STANDARDS ON INNOVATION , 2014 .

[9]  E. Mansfield Industrial research and technological innovation , 1968 .

[10]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5 °C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies , 2018, Nature Energy.

[11]  Amory B. Lovins,et al.  Small is profitable: The Hidden economic benefits of making electrical resources the right size , 2003 .

[12]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  An international comparative assessment of construction cost overruns for electricity infrastructure , 2014 .

[13]  Ram Rajagopal,et al.  Data-driven planning of distributed energy resources amidst socio-technical complexities , 2017, Nature Energy.