Ex vivo Mueller polarimetric imaging of the uterine cervix: a first statistical evaluation

Abstract. Early detection through screening plays a major role in reducing the impact of cervical cancer on patients. When detected before the invasive stage, precancerous lesions can be eliminated with very limited surgery. Polarimetric imaging is a potential alternative to the standard screening methods currently used. In a previous proof-of-concept study, significant contrasts have been found in polarimetric images acquired for healthy and precancerous regions of excised cervical tissue. To quantify the ability of the technique to differentiate between healthy and precancerous tissue, polarimetric images of seventeen cervical conization specimens (cone-shaped or cylindrical wedges from the uterine cervix) are compared with results from histopathological diagnoses, which is considered to be the “gold standard.” The sensitivity and specificity of the technique are calculated for images acquired at wavelengths of 450, 550, and 600 nm, aiming to differentiate between high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2-3) and healthy squamous epithelium. To do so, a sliding threshold for the scalar retardance parameter was used for the sample zones, as labeled after histological diagnosis. An optimized value of ∼83% is achieved for both sensitivity and specificity for images acquired at 450 nm and for a threshold scalar retardance value of 10.6 deg. This study paves the way for an application of polarimetry in the clinic.

[1]  Michele Follen,et al.  Accuracy of Colposcopy in the Diagnostic Setting Compared With the Screening Setting , 2008, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  L. Twiggs,et al.  Spectroscopic Imaging as a Triage Test for Cervical Disease: A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial , 2006, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[3]  Marika A. Wallenburg,et al.  Effects of formalin fixation on tissue optical polarization properties , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  M Arbyn,et al.  Accuracy of colposcopy‐directed punch biopsies: a systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2012, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[5]  Angelo Pierangelo,et al.  Polarimetric imaging of uterine cervix: a case study. , 2013, Optics express.

[6]  A. Pierangelo,et al.  Ex-vivo characterization of human colon cancer by Mueller polarimetric imaging. , 2011, Optics express.

[7]  C. Mathers,et al.  Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008 , 2010, International journal of cancer.

[8]  Thomas C Wright,et al.  Effective cervical neoplasia detection with a novel optical detection system: a randomized trial. , 2007, Gynecologic oncology.

[9]  H. Lynch,et al.  Psychologic Aspects of Cancer Genetic Testing: A Research Update for Clinicians , 1997 .

[10]  Jessica C Ramella-Roman,et al.  Imaging skin pathology with polarized light. , 2002, Journal of biomedical optics.

[11]  Angelo Pierangelo,et al.  Multispectral Mueller polarimetric imaging detecting residual cancer and cancer regression after neoadjuvant treatment for colorectal carcinomas , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[12]  Antonello De Martino,et al.  Determination of collagen fiber orientation in histological slides using Mueller microscopy and validation by second harmonic generation imaging. , 2014, Optics express.

[13]  W. Youden,et al.  Index for rating diagnostic tests , 1950, Cancer.

[14]  Rebecca Richards-Kortum,et al.  Optical imaging for cervical cancer detection: solutions for a continuing global problem , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[15]  Michele Follen,et al.  The clinical effectiveness of optical spectroscopy for the in vivo diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: where are we? , 2007, Gynecologic oncology.

[16]  R. Chipman,et al.  Interpretation of Mueller matrices based on polar decomposition , 1996 .

[17]  Yvonne C Collins,et al.  Strength of correlations between colposcopic impression and biopsy histology. , 2003, Gynecologic oncology.

[18]  Quan Liu,et al.  Investigation on the potential of Mueller matrix imaging for digital staining , 2016, Journal of biophotonics.

[19]  Thomas C Wright,et al.  Increased detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia utilizing an optical detection system as an adjunct to colposcopy. , 2007, Gynecologic oncology.

[20]  Nirmalya Ghosh,et al.  Tissue polarimetry: concepts, challenges, applications, and outlook. , 2011, Journal of biomedical optics.

[21]  Angelo Pierangelo,et al.  The origins of polarimetric image contrast between healthy and cancerous human colon tissue , 2013 .

[22]  S. Sifakis,et al.  Recent advances in optical imaging for cervical cancer detection , 2011, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[23]  Jean Rehbinder,et al.  Diagnosis of uterine cervix cancer using Müller polarimetry: a comparison with histopathology , 2015, European Conference on Biomedical Optics.

[24]  Population-level impact and herd effects following human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, BDJ.

[25]  R. Lotan,et al.  Laser scanning confocal microscopy of cervical tissue before and after application of acetic acid. , 2000, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[26]  Antonello De Martino,et al.  Mueller polarimetric imaging system with liquid crystals. , 2004, Applied optics.

[27]  Kate Soldan,et al.  Population-level impact and herd effects following human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, BDJ.