Moving Beyond Silos in Cumulative Effects Assessment

Many of the world’s ecosystems are experiencing a suite of changes from anthropogenic activities; the multiple stressors from those activities result in cumulative impacts. Understanding how these activities translate into ecological consequences is exceedingly challenging because of the inherent complexity within natural systems and the variability in how stressors act and species respond. While there have been substantial advancements within the field of cumulative effects assessment to address these issues and improve our understanding of the consequences of our actions, many challenges in remain. Here, we detail advances and remaining challenges, and propose five priorities for addressing these challenges in the near future. In particular, we suggest prioritizing risk-based approaches that account for uncertainty in our understanding, and establishing underlying theory for when we expect particular impacts to occur. We also propose the need for a defined subdiscipline focused on cumulative effects, to help reduce the silos of research that are often disconnected, and to work towards a common set of definitions, methods and consistent use of open-data.

[1]  Jeroen Steenbeek,et al.  A risk-based approach to cumulative effect assessments for marine management. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  Evolution and structure of sustainability science , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Bernard C. K. Choi,et al.  Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. , 2006, Clinical and investigative medicine. Medecine clinique et experimentale.

[4]  Gary P. Griffith,et al.  Predicting Interactions among Fishing, Ocean Warming, and Ocean Acidification in a Marine System with Whole‐Ecosystem Models , 2012, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[5]  S. Weart Rise of interdisciplinary research on climate , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  W. Christopher Lenhardt,et al.  The Tao of open science for ecology , 2015 .

[7]  S. N. Wiemeyer,et al.  Dieldrin and DDT: Effects on Sparrow Hawk Eggshells and Reproduction , 1969, Science.

[8]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[9]  Lorne A. Greig,et al.  A proposal for further strengthening science in environmental impact assessment in Canada , 2011 .

[10]  Helen Bailey,et al.  Cumulative human impacts on marine predators , 2013, Nature Communications.

[11]  T. Aven,et al.  On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain , 2009 .

[12]  M. Power Assessing the effects of environmental stressors on fish populations , 1997 .

[13]  Carrie V. Kappel,et al.  Characterizing driver-response relationships in marine pelagic ecosystems for improved ocean management. , 2016, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[14]  W. J. Fletcher The application of qualitative risk assessment methodology to prioritize issues for fisheries management , 2005 .

[15]  P. T. Haug,et al.  Systematic interdisciplinary language for environmental analysis under the National Environmental Policy Act , 1984 .

[16]  B. Noble Cumulative environmental effects and the tyranny of small decisions : towards meaningful cumulative effects assessment and management , 2010 .

[17]  Carrie V. Kappel,et al.  Principles for managing marine ecosystems prone to tipping points , 2015 .

[18]  T. Essington,et al.  When does hypoxia affect management performance of a fishery? A management strategy evaluation of Dungeness crab (Metacarcinus magister) fisheries in Hood Canal, Washington, USA , 2017 .

[19]  D. Goulson,et al.  Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers , 2015, Science.

[20]  C. Brown,et al.  Interactions among ecosystem stressors and their importance in conservation , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  Daniel E. Schindler,et al.  Prediction, precaution, and policy under global change , 2015, Science.

[22]  Benjamin S. Halpern,et al.  Assumptions, challenges, and future directions in cumulative impact analysis , 2013 .

[23]  John E. Hay,et al.  Notes on cumulative environmental change I : concepts and issues , 1992 .

[24]  K. Chan,et al.  Scientific shortcomings in environmental impact statements internationally , 2018, People and Nature.

[25]  K. Astles,et al.  An ecological method for qualitative risk assessment and its use in the management of fisheries in New South Wales, Australia , 2006 .

[26]  John E. Hay,et al.  Notes on cumulative environmental change II: a contribution to methodology , 1992 .

[27]  Rebecca G. Martone,et al.  The challenges and opportunities in cumulative effects assessment , 2017 .

[28]  William R. Sheate,et al.  Cumulative effects assessment: A review of UK environmental impact statements , 2002 .

[29]  T. Essington,et al.  Movement Patterns and Distributional Shifts of Dungeness Crab (Metacarcinus magister) and English Sole (Parophrys vetulus) During Seasonal Hypoxia , 2014, Estuaries and Coasts.

[30]  Elizabeth A. Fulton,et al.  Fishing catch shares in the face of global change: a framework for integrating cumulative impacts and single species management , 2010 .

[31]  P. McIntyre,et al.  Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity , 2010, Nature.

[32]  A. Budden,et al.  Big data and the future of ecology , 2013 .

[33]  S. Dupont,et al.  Experimental strategies to assess the biological ramifications of multiple drivers of global ocean change—A review , 2018, Global change biology.

[34]  T. Essington,et al.  Density dependence governs when population responses to multiple stressors are magnified or mitigated. , 2017, Ecology.

[35]  J. B. Shopley,et al.  A comprehensive review of current environmental impact assessment methods and techniques , 1984 .

[36]  Jonathan H. Grabowski,et al.  Building effective fishery ecosystem plans , 2018, Marine Policy.

[37]  Camille Mellin,et al.  A review and meta‐analysis of the effects of multiple abiotic stressors on marine embryos and larvae , 2015, Global change biology.

[38]  Patricia A. Soranno,et al.  Macrosystems ecology: big data, big ecology , 2014 .

[39]  W. J. Fletcher Review and refinement of an existing qualitative risk assessment method for application within an ecosystem-based management framework , 2015 .

[40]  Lorne A. Greig,et al.  Scientific dimensions of cumulative effects assessment: toward improvements in guidance for practice , 2013 .

[41]  Emma E Hodgson,et al.  Investigating cumulative effects across ecological scales , 2018, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[42]  Benjamin S Halpern,et al.  Interactive and cumulative effects of multiple human stressors in marine systems. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[43]  I. Côté,et al.  Quantifying the evidence for ecological synergies. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[44]  Carrie V. Kappel,et al.  A Global Map of Human Impact on Marine Ecosystems , 2008, Science.

[45]  W. C. Long,et al.  Effects of long-term exposure to ocean acidification conditions on future southern Tanner crab (Chionoecetes bairdi) fisheries management , 2016 .

[46]  Gary P. Griffith,et al.  New approaches to simulating the complex interaction effects of multiple human impacts on the marine environment , 2014 .

[47]  G. Nilsson,et al.  Interacting effects of elevated temperature and ocean acidification on the aerobic performance of coral reef fishes , 2009 .

[48]  Monique G. Dubé,et al.  Cumulative effect assessment in Canada: a regional framework for aquatic ecosystems , 2003 .

[49]  Larry W. Canter,et al.  State of practice of cumulative effects assessment and management: the good, the bad and the ugly , 2010 .

[50]  Barry Smit,et al.  Methods for cumulative effects assessment , 1995 .