Advanced tokamak research in DIII-D

Advanced tokamak (AT) research in DIII-D seeks to provide a scientific basis for steady-state high performance operation in future devices. These regimes require high toroidal beta to maximize fusion output and high poloidal beta to maximize the self-driven bootstrap current. Achieving these conditions requires integrated, simultaneous control of the current and pressure profiles and active magnetohydrodynamic stability control. The building blocks for AT operation are in hand. Resistive wall mode stabilization by plasma rotation and active feedback with non-axisymmetric coils allows routine operation above the no-wall beta limit. Neoclassical tearing modes are stabilized by active feedback control of localized electron cyclotron current drive (ECCD). Plasma shaping and profile control provide further improvements. Under these conditions, bootstrap supplies most of the current. Steady-state operation requires replacing the remaining inductively driven current, mostly located near the half radius, with non-inductive external sources. In DIII-D this current is provided by ECCD, and nearly stationary AT discharges have been sustained with little remaining inductive current. Fast wave current drive is being developed to control the central magnetic shear. Density control, with divertor cryopumps, of AT discharges with ELMing H-mode edges facilitates high current drive efficiency at reactor relevant collisionalities. An advanced plasma control system allows integrated control of these elements. Close coupling between modelling and experiment is key to understanding the separate elements, their complex nonlinear interactions, and their integration into self-consistent high performance scenarios. This approach has resulted in fully non-inductively driven plasmas with βN ≤ 3.5 and βT ≤ 3.6% sustained for up to 1 s, which is approximately equal to one current relaxation time. Progress in this area, and its implications for next-step devices, will be illustrated by results of these and other recent experiment and simulation efforts.

[1]  O. Sauter,et al.  Hybrid advanced scenarios: perspectives for ITER and new experiments with dominant RF heating , 2004 .

[2]  J. Weiland,et al.  Physics of transport in tokamaks , 2004 .

[3]  A. Manini,et al.  Profile stiffness and global confinement , 2004 .

[4]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Resistive wall mode stabilization with internal feedback coils in DIII-D , 2004 .

[5]  M. R. Wade,et al.  High performance stationary discharges in the DIII-D tokamak , 2004 .

[6]  Jt Team,et al.  High-beta steady-state research and future directions on the Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute Tokamak-60 Upgrade and the Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute Fusion Torus-2 Modified , 2004 .

[7]  A. M. Garofalo,et al.  High performance advanced tokamak regimes in DIII-D for next-step experiments , 2004 .

[8]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Modeling of feedback and rotation stabilization of the resistive wall mode in tokamaks , 2004 .

[9]  R. E. Waltz,et al.  Burning Plasma Confinement Projections and Renormalization of the GLF23 Drift-Wave Transport Model , 2003 .

[10]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  ADVANCED TOKAMAK OPERATION USING THE DIII-D PLASMA CONTROL SYSTEM , 2003 .

[11]  J. Kinsey,et al.  Effects of electron trapping and transport on electron cyclotron current drive on DIII-D , 2003 .

[12]  T. Casper,et al.  EFFECT OF PROFILES AND SHAPE ON IDEAL STABILITY OF ADVANCED TOKAMAK EQUILIBRIA , 2003 .

[13]  J. Ferron,et al.  Shape Optimization for DIII-D Advanced Tokamak Plasmas , 2003 .

[14]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Integrated, advanced tokamak operation on DIII-D , 2003 .

[15]  Wade,et al.  CHANGES IN PARTICLE PUMPING DUE TO VARIATION IN MAGNETIC BALANCE NEAR DOUBLE-NULL IN DIII-D , 2003 .

[16]  L. Lao,et al.  Modification of the current profile in high-performance plasmas using off-axis electron-cyclotron-current drive in DIII-D. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[17]  C. Giroud,et al.  Progress towards steady-state operation and real-time control of internal transport barriers in JET , 2003 .

[18]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Advanced tokamak profile evolution in DIII-D , 2003 .

[19]  E. J. Strait,et al.  COMPLETE SUPPRESSION OF THE M=2/N-1 NEOCLASSICAL TEARING MODE USING ELECTRON CYCLOTRON CURRENT DRIVE ON DIII-D , 2003 .

[20]  E. D. Fredrickson,et al.  Stabilization of the resistive wall mode in DIII–D by plasma rotation and magnetic feedback , 2002 .

[21]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Sustained rotational stabilization of DIII-D plasmas above the no-wall beta limit , 2002 .

[22]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  CONTROL OF NEOCLASSICAL TEARING MODES IN DIII-D , 2001 .

[23]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Progress toward long-pulse high-performance Advanced Tokamak discharges on the DIII-D tokamak , 2001 .

[24]  K. Kajiwara,et al.  Complete stabilization of a tearing mode in steady state high-βp H-mode discharges by the first harmonic electron cyclotron heating/current drive on JT-60U , 2000 .

[25]  J. Kinsey,et al.  Progress towards increased understanding and control of internal transport barriers in DIII-D , 2002 .

[26]  Gunter,et al.  Complete suppression of neoclassical tearing modes with current drive at the electron-cyclotron-resonance frequency in ASDEX upgrade tokamak , 2000, Physical review letters.

[27]  O. Naito,et al.  Role of radial electric field and plasma rotation in the time evolution of internal transport barrier in JT-60U , 2000 .

[28]  T. L. Rhodes,et al.  Observation of simultaneous internal transport barriers in all four transport channels and correlation with turbulence behaviour in NCS discharges on DIII-D , 2000 .

[29]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Understanding and control of transport in Advanced Tokamak regimes in DIII-D , 2000 .

[30]  C. M. Greenfield,et al.  Improved core fueling with high field side pellet injection in the DIII-D tokamak , 2000 .

[31]  T. L. Rhodes,et al.  Behaviour of electron and ion transport in discharges with an internal transport barrier in the DIII-D tokamak , 1999 .

[32]  O. Sauter,et al.  Neoclassical conductivity and bootstrap current formulas for general axisymmetric equilibria and arbitrary collisionality regime , 1999 .

[33]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Real time equilibrium reconstruction for tokamak discharge control , 1998 .

[34]  T. S. Taylor,et al.  Physics of advanced tokamaks , 1997 .

[35]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Direct Measurement of the Radial Electric Field in Tokamak Plasmas using the Stark Effect , 1997 .

[36]  W. Houlberg,et al.  Bootstrap current and neoclassical transport in tokamaks of arbitrary collisionality and aspect ratio , 1997 .

[37]  R. Waltz,et al.  A gyro-Landau-fluid transport model , 1997 .

[38]  G. Taylor,et al.  Roles of Electric Field Shear and Shafranov Shift in Sustaining High Confinement in Enhanced Reversed Shear Plasmas on the TFTR Tokamak , 1997 .

[39]  G. Hammett,et al.  Gyrofluid simulations of turbulence suppression in reversed-shear experiments on the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor , 1997 .

[40]  K. H. Burrell,et al.  Flow shear induced fluctuation suppression in finite aspect ratio shaped tokamak plasma , 1995 .

[41]  Lao,et al.  Determination of the noninductive current profile in tokamak plasmas. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[42]  L. Lao,et al.  An optimization of beta in the DIII-D tokamak , 1992 .

[43]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Equilibrium analysis of current profiles in tokamaks , 1990 .

[44]  S. Dhali.  Electrical characteristics of pulsed glow discharges , 1989 .

[45]  K. Matsuda,et al.  Ray tracing study of the electron cyclotron current drive in DIII-D using 60 GHz , 1989 .

[46]  Tadashi Sekiguchi,et al.  Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research , 1987 .

[47]  R. J. Hawryluk,et al.  An Empirical Approach to Tokamak Transport , 1981 .

[48]  J. W. Connor,et al.  Diffusion Driven Plasma Currents and Bootstrap Tokamak , 1971 .

[49]  E. G. Hope,et al.  Frequency of the Hydrogen Maser , 1971, Nature.