SMISLE : system for multimedia integrated simulation learning environments

The SMISLE project (System for Multimedia Integrated Simulation Learning Environments) has two main objectives. First, it aims to define exploratory learning environments based on simulations that incorporate instructional support for learners in such a way that effective and efficient learning will result. Second, it aims to provide authors of these simulation learning environments with an authoring toolkit that not only presents technical, but also conceptual support. Providing support to the learner can be done in many different ways. The project started with an inventory of potential instructional support measures and selected four types of measures that now have been implemented: progressive model implementation, assignments, explanations, and hypothesis scratchpads. The simulation environments that incorporate these support measures are designed around five different models each carrying a specific function. The runnable model is an efficient representation of the domain that will make the simulation run; the cognitive model is the representation of the domain that is tailored to learning and instruction; the instructional model incorporates the instructional support; the learner model keeps track of knowledge and characteristics of the learner; and the interface model decides upon the appearance of the simulation environment to the student. Together these models form the resulting application for the learner, which is called a MISLE (Multimedia Integrated Simulation Learning Environment). The main task of an author is to create the different models in the MISLE, with the exception of the runnable model which is automatically generated from the cognitive model. Creating the different models essentially means that an author has to select, specialise and instantiate generic building blocks (that can be regarded as generic templates) that are offered in libraries of building blocks. For each of the models there is a separate library of building blocks and a set of dedicated editors for specialising and instantiating the building blocks. Additionally, authors are guided through the authoring process by a methodology and they have access to instructional advice which provides them with ideas on which instructional support measures to apply.

[1]  Kevin Dunbar,et al.  Concept Discovery in a Scientific Domain , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  Paul W. Grimes,et al.  The effectiveness of microcomputer simulations in the principles of economics course , 1990 .

[3]  T. Jong,et al.  Exploratory learning with a computer simulation for control theory: learning processes and instructional support , 1993 .

[4]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Modelling domain knowledge for intelligent simulation learning environments , 1991 .

[5]  J. V. Faryniarz,et al.  Effectiveness of Microcomputer Simulations in Stimulating Environmental Problem Solving by Community College Students. , 1992 .

[6]  Barbara Y. White,et al.  Causal Model Progressions as a Foundation for Intelligent Learning Environments , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[7]  Wouter van Joolingen,et al.  Authoring for intelligent simulation based instruction : a model based approach , 1992 .

[8]  James Lyle Peterson,et al.  Petri net theory and the modeling of systems , 1981 .

[9]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[10]  Barbara Y. White,et al.  Causal models as intelligent learning environments for science and engineering education , 1989, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[11]  William F. Brewer,et al.  The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction , 1993 .

[12]  van Wr Wouter Joolingen,et al.  Understanding and facilitating discovery learning in computer-based simulation environments , 1993 .

[13]  P. Reimann.  Detecting functional relations in a computerized discovery environment , 1991 .

[14]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Computer assisted learning in higher education in The Netherlands: a review of findings , 1992 .

[15]  Vitor Duarte Teodoro.  Direct Manipulation of Physical Concepts in a Computerized Exploratory Laboratory , 1992 .

[16]  Valerie J. Shute,et al.  A Large-Scale Evaluation of an Intelligent Discovery World: Smithtown , 1990, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[17]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Learning and instruction with computer simulations , 1991 .

[18]  Robert H. Rivers,et al.  Computer simulations to stimulate scientific problem solving , 1987 .

[19]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Supporting exploratory learning by offering structured overviews of hypotheses , 1993 .

[20]  David Klahr,et al.  Dual Space Search During Scientific Reasoning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  D. Towne,et al.  Exploring a domain through a computer simulation: traversing variable and relation space with the help of a hypothesis scratchpad , 1993 .

[22]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Coping with Complex Environments: The Effects of Providing Overviews and a Transparent Interface on Learning with a Computer Simulation , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[23]  D. Leutner.  Guided discovery learning with computer-based simulation games: Effects of adaptive and non-adaptive instructional support , 1993 .

[24]  François E. Cellier,et al.  Continuous system modeling , 1991 .

[25]  Hans Spada,et al.  Analysis-based Learning on Multiple Levels of Mental Domain Representation , 1992 .

[26]  Thomas Andre,et al.  Use of a Microcomputer Simulation and Conceptual Change Text to Overcome Student Preconceptions about Electric Circuits. , 1992 .

[27]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Supporting hypothesis generation by learners exploring an interactive computer simulation , 1991 .

[28]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems: Computational and Cognitive Approaches to the Communication of Knowledge , 1987 .