OWL-Based Semantic Conflicts Detection and Resolution for Data Interoperability

Ontology provides sharing knowledge among different data sources which will help to clarify the semantics of information. OWL is being promoted as a standard for web ontology language, thus in the future a considerable number of ontologies will be created based on OWL. Therefore automatically detecting semantic conflicts based on OWL will greatly expedite the step to achieve semantic interoperability, and will greatly reduce the manual work to detect semantic conflicts. In this paper, we summarize seven cases based on OWL in which semantic conflicts are easily to be encountered, and for each case, we give a rule to resolve the conflict. Via a series of examples, we show how this method works. Based on the seven cases, we propose a semantic conflicts detection and resolution algorithm. This aims at providing a semi-automatic method for semantic uniform data interoperability and integration.

[1]  Aris M. Ouksel,et al.  A classification of semantic conflicts in heterogeneous database systems , 1995, J. Organ. Comput..

[2]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  Enabling Technology for Knowledge Sharing , 1991, AI Mag..

[3]  Dan Brickley,et al.  Resource description framework (RDF) schema specification , 1998 .

[4]  Tok Wang Ling,et al.  Resolving Structural Conflicts in the Integration of Entity Relationship Schemas , 1995, OOER.

[5]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  Swartout: Enabling technology for knowledge sharing , 1991 .

[6]  Hongjun Lu,et al.  Discovering and Reconciling Semantic Conflicts: A Data Mining Perspective , 1997, DS-7.

[7]  Tok Wang Ling,et al.  Resolving Structural Conflicts in the Integration of XML Schemas: A Semantic Approach , 2003, ER.

[8]  Jungyun Seo,et al.  Classifying schematic and data heterogeneity in multidatabase systems , 1991, Computer.

[9]  Ravi Krishnamurthy,et al.  Language features for interoperability of databases with schematic discrepancies , 1991, SIGMOD '91.

[10]  Steffen Staab,et al.  The Ontology Inference Layer OIL , 2000 .

[11]  Vipul Kashyap,et al.  So Far (Schematically) yet So Near (Semantically) , 1992, DS-5.

[12]  Gio Wiederhold,et al.  Mediators in the architecture of future information systems , 1992, Computer.

[13]  A Min Tjoa,et al.  A framework for a multidimensional OLAP model using Topic Maps , 2001, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering.

[14]  L. Stein,et al.  OWL Web Ontology Language - Reference , 2004 .

[15]  Stuart E. Madnick,et al.  Representing and reasoning about semantic conflicts in heterogeneous information systems , 1997 .

[16]  Tok Wang Ling,et al.  Resolving Constraint Conflicts in the Integration of Entity-Relationship Schemas , 1997, ER.