A Statistical Mechanics Approach to Systemic Risk under Bilateral Netting Agreements

We propose a statistical mechanics approach to the problem of financial network reconstruction and systemic risk when participants benefit from bilateral netting agreements. We apply physical reasoning to directly estimate individual financial liabilities from data on both total gross and net positions of total liabilities and total assets. We map this constrained network reconstruction problem to an energy-minimization one, to which we apply a Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithmic to sample from this restricted space. These samples are then used to evaluate the impact of bilateral netting strategies to individual defaults and contagion. As an application, we employ this method to derivative networks and derive individual probabilities of default of banks. The comparison against popular alternative methods underlines the importance of restricting sample solutions to those compatible with the netting strategies of banks. We also provide an R package implementing our methodology.

[1]  Kartik Anand,et al.  Filling in the blanks: network structure and interbank contagion , 2014, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[2]  Rama Cont,et al.  Credit default swaps and systemic risk , 2016, Ann. Oper. Res..

[3]  Axel Gandy,et al.  Adjustable network reconstruction with applications to CDS exposures , 2019, J. Multivar. Anal..

[4]  Mathias Drehmann,et al.  Measuring the Systemic Importance of Interconnected Banks , 2011 .

[5]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  Random graphs , 2006, SODA '06.

[6]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Bootstrapping Topological Properties and Systemic Risk of Complex Networks Using the Fitness Model , 2012, Journal of Statistical Physics.

[7]  Rodney Garratt,et al.  The missing links : A global study on uncovering fi nancial network structures from partial data 夽 , 2018 .

[8]  D. Garlaschelli,et al.  Reconstruction methods for networks: The case of economic and financial systems , 2018, Physics Reports.

[9]  L. C. G. Rogers,et al.  Failure and Rescue in an Interbank Network , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Rama Cont,et al.  RESILIENCE TO CONTAGION IN FINANCIAL NETWORKS , 2010, 1112.5687.

[11]  Axel Gandy,et al.  A Bayesian Methodology for Systemic Risk Assessment in Financial Networks , 2016, Manag. Sci..

[12]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[13]  Larry Eisenberg,et al.  Systemic Risk in Financial Networks , 1999, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Giulio Cimini,et al.  Systemic Risk Analysis on Reconstructed Economic and Financial Networks , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[15]  D. Vere-Jones Markov Chains , 1972, Nature.

[16]  R. Brualdi Convex Sets of Non-Negative Matrices , 1968, Canadian Journal of Mathematics.

[17]  Jose Fique,et al.  Estimation of Bilateral Exposures-A Copula Approach An Extended Abstract and Brief Overview , 2012 .

[18]  Christoffer Kok,et al.  Assessing interbank contagion using simulated networks , 2013, Comput. Manag. Sci..

[19]  E. Jaynes Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics , 1957 .

[20]  Christian Upper,et al.  Estimating Bilateral Exposures in the German Interbank Market: Is There a Danger of Contagion? , 2002, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[21]  D. Frenkel Order through entropy. , 2015, Nature materials.

[22]  Douglas J. Ashton,et al.  Self-assembly and crystallisation of indented colloids at a planar wall. , 2014, Soft matter.