A pervasive framework toward sustainability and smart-growth: Assessing multifaceted transportation performance measures for smart cities

Abstract Introduction The concept of a smart city is fast becoming a key instrument in transforming living environments in a better way to enhance the operational efficiency of a transportation system. This paper presents a framework to assess transportation performance measures and smart-growth of cities around the U.S. by including physical activity as one of the main criteria. Methods This study employs Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) as a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) method. The proposed assessment framework is comprised of the evaluation of an individual criterion and the assessment of comprehensive results. The criteria are categorized into four groups including network performance, traffic safety, environmental impact, and physical activity. As a case example, the proposed performance measures were examined for forty-six cities in the U.S., and the required data was gathered from multiple sources. Results The output of the framework contains sustainability and smart-growth rankings of the selected cities as well as uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. The sensitivity analysis was utilized to determine the quantity that each performance measure or weighting factor requires to alter the smart-growth score. It has been illustrated that the dominancy between reversible pairs in the ranking is critically sensitive for almost 15% of cases. Conclusion The results of the proposed framework can be an effective decision supporting tool in analyzing traffic management strategies. Results from the score sensitivity calculation indicate that the proposed framework can be adopted in multifaceted transportation system performance in sustainability and smart-growth of cities.

[1]  Jordi Vives i Costa,et al.  Numerical model for a nineteenth-century hydrometric module , 2019 .

[2]  Christy Mihyeon Jeon,et al.  Addressing Sustainability in Transportation Systems: Definitions, Indicators, and Metrics , 2005 .

[3]  J. Woodcock,et al.  Health and greenhouse gas mitigation benefits of ambitious expansion of cycling, walking, and transit in California , 2017, Journal of transport & health.

[4]  Andres Monzon,et al.  Evaluating sustainability and innovation of mobility patterns in Spanish cities. Analysis by size and urban typology , 2018 .

[5]  Wann-Ming Wey,et al.  New Urbanism and Smart Growth: Toward achieving a smart National Taipei University District , 2014 .

[6]  H. Haghshenas,et al.  Urban sustainable transportation indicators for global comparison , 2012 .

[7]  E. Triantaphyllou,et al.  A Sensitivity Analysis Approach for Some Deterministic Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods* , 1997 .

[8]  J Richard Kuzmyak,et al.  Walking and Bicycling in the United States: The Who, What, Where, and Why , 2012 .

[9]  R. Burnett,et al.  Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. , 2002, JAMA.

[10]  Ewa Roszkowska,et al.  Multi-criteria Decision Making Models by Applying the Topsis Method to Crisp and Interval Data , 2011 .

[11]  M. Givoni,et al.  Health Impact Modelling of Active Travel Visions for England and Wales Using an Integrated Transport and Health Impact Modelling Tool (ITHIM) , 2013, PloS one.

[12]  D. Schrank,et al.  2015 Urban Mobility Scorecard , 2015 .

[13]  Gino J. Lim,et al.  A framework for building a smart port and smart port index , 2020, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation.

[14]  Asad J Khattak,et al.  The role of pre-crash driving instability in contributing to crash intensity using naturalistic driving data. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  Leslie A Meehan,et al.  The Integrated Transport and Health Impact Modeling Tool in Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Implementation Steps and Lessons Learned. , 2017, Journal of transport & health.

[17]  Todd Alexander Litman,et al.  Sustainable Transportation Indicators: A Recommended Research Program For Developing Sustainable Transportation Indicators and Data , 2009 .

[18]  Ken Rose,et al.  U.S. Transportation and Health Tool: Data for action. , 2017, Journal of transport & health.

[19]  Eun-Sung Chung,et al.  Robustness, Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses of the TOPSIS Method for Quantitative Climate Change Vulnerability: a Case Study of Flood Damage , 2016, Water Resources Management.

[20]  Arkalgud Ramaprasad,et al.  A Unified Definition of a Smart City , 2017, EGOV.

[21]  Geni Bahar,et al.  Crash Costs for Highway Safety Analysis , 2018 .

[22]  Oliver O’Brien,et al.  Health effects of the London bicycle sharing system: health impact modelling study , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.