Self-organization in collective honeybee foraging: emergence of symmetry breaking, cross inhibition and equal harvest-rate distribution

Abstract. De Vries and Biesmeijer described in 1998 an individual-oriented model that simulates the collective foraging behaviour of a colony of honeybees. Here we report how this model has been expanded and show how, through self-organization, three colony-level phenomena can emerge: symmetry breaking, cross inhibition and the equal harvest-rate distribution. Symmetry breaking is the phenomenon that the numbers of foragers visiting two equally profitable food sources will diverge after some time. Cross inhibition is the phenomenon that, by increasing the profitability of one of two equal food sources, the number of foragers visiting the other source will decrease. In some circumstances, the bees foraging on two sources of different profitabilities will be distributed between these sources such that the two average energy harvest rates are equal. We will refer to this phenomenon as the equal harvest-rate distribution. For each of these three phenomena, we show what the necessary behavioural rules to be followed by the individual forager bees are, and what the necessary circumstances are (that is, what values the model parameters should take) in order for these phenomena to arise. It seems that patch size and forager group size largely determine when each of these phenomena will arise. Experimenting with two types of currency, net gain rate and net gain efficiency, revealed that only gain rate may result in an equal harvest-rate distribution of foragers visiting different food sources.

[1]  K. Frisch The dance language and orientation of bees , 1967 .

[2]  S. Fretwell Populations in a seasonal environment. , 1973, Monographs in population biology.

[3]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Self-organization mechanisms in ant societies. I. Trail recruitment to newly discovered food sources , 1987 .

[4]  P. Hogeweg,et al.  Individual-oriented modelling in ecology , 1990 .

[5]  S. Camazine,et al.  A model of collective nectar source selection by honey bees , 1991 .

[6]  Craig A. Tovey,et al.  The Pattern and Effectiveness of Forager Allocation Among Flower Patches by Honey Bee Colonies , 1993 .

[7]  Ladislav Lhotka Implementation of individual-oriented models in aquatic ecology , 1994 .

[8]  T. Seeley,et al.  Why search time to find a food-storer bee accurately indicates the relative rates of nectar collecting and nectar processing in honey bee colonies , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  O P Judson,et al.  The rise of the individual-based model in ecology. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  Scott Camazine,et al.  Self-Organized Thermoregulation of Honeybee Clusters , 1995 .

[11]  T. Seeley,et al.  The honey bee’s tremble dance stimulates additional bees to function as nectar receivers , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[12]  Tamiji Inoue,et al.  Aggressive foraging of social bees as a mechanism of floral resource partitioning in an Asian tropical rainforest , 1997, Oecologia.

[13]  E. Bonabeau,et al.  Self-organization in social insects. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  J. Biesmeijer,et al.  Modelling collective foraging by means of individual behaviour rules in honey-bees , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  Carl Anderson Simulation of the Feedbacks and Regulation of Recruitment Dancing in Honey Bees , 1998, Adv. Complex Syst..

[16]  Scott Camazine,et al.  The mystery of swarming honeybees: from individual behaviors to collective decisions. , 1999 .

[17]  T. Seeley,et al.  Group decision making in swarms of honey bees , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[18]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Self-organization or individual complexity: a false dilemma or a true complementarity? , 1999 .

[19]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Worker allocation in insect societies: coordination of nectar foragers and nectar receivers in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[20]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Information Processing in Social Insects , 1999, Birkhäuser Basel.

[21]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Self-organized defensive behavior in honeybees. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  J. Biesmeijer,et al.  Exploration and exploitation of food sources by social insect colonies: a revision of the scout-recruit concept , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[23]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Self-Organization in Biological Systems , 2001, Princeton studies in complexity.

[24]  Per Kryger,et al.  Self-organization of circadian rhythms in groups of honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) , 1994, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[25]  T. Seeley,et al.  Collective decision-making in honey bees: how colonies choose among nectar sources , 1991, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[26]  T. Seeley Honey bee foragers as sensory units of their colonies , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[27]  T. Seeley The tremble dance of the honey bee: message and meanings , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.