State estimation in wall-bounded flow systems. Part 2. Turbulent flows

This work extends the estimator developed in Part 1 of this study to the problem of estimating a turbulent channel flow at $Re_{\tau}\,{=}\,100$ based on a history of noisy measurements on the wall. The key advancement enabling this work is the development and implementation of an efficient technique to extract, from direct numerical simulations, the relevant statistics of an appropriately defined ‘external forcing’ term on the Navier–Stokes equation linearized about the mean turbulent flow profile. This forcing term is designed to account for the unmodelled (nonlinear) terms during the computation of the (linear) Kalman filter feedback gains in Fourier space. Upon inverse transform of the resulting feedback gains computed on an array of wavenumber pairs to physical space, we obtain, as in Part 1, effective and well-resolved feedback convolution kernels for the estimation problem. It is demonstrated that, by applying the feedback so determined, satisfactory correlation between the actual and estimated flow is obtained in the near-wall region. As anticipated, extended Kalman filters (with the nonlinearity of the actual system reintroduced into the estimator model after the feedback gains are determined) outperform standard (linear) Kalman filters on the full system.

[1]  B. Bamieh,et al.  Modeling flow statistics using the linearized Navier-Stokes equations , 2001, Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.01CH37228).

[2]  M. Högberg,et al.  Relaminarization of Re t Ä 100 turbulence using gain scheduling and linear state-feedback control , 2003 .

[3]  Dan S. Henningson,et al.  Relaminarization of Reτ=100 turbulence using gain scheduling and linear state-feedback control , 2003 .

[4]  Javier Jiménez,et al.  THE PHYSICS OF WALL TURBULENCE , 1999 .

[5]  Thomas Bewley,et al.  Optimal and robust control and estimation of linear paths to transition , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  Junwoo Lim,et al.  A linear process in wall-bounded turbulent shear flows , 2000 .

[7]  Satish C. Reddy,et al.  A MATLAB differentiation matrix suite , 2000, TOMS.

[8]  P. Schmid,et al.  Stability and Transition in Shear Flows. By P. J. SCHMID & D. S. HENNINGSON. Springer, 2001. 556 pp. ISBN 0-387-98985-4. £ 59.50 or $79.95 , 2000, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  Fernando Paganini,et al.  Distributed control of spatially invariant systems , 2002, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[10]  Parviz Moin,et al.  Characteristic-eddy decomposition of turbulence in a channel , 1989, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  Roger Temam,et al.  DNS-based predictive control of turbulence: an optimal benchmark for feedback algorithms , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  Thomas Bewley,et al.  Flow control: new challenges for a new Renaissance , 2001 .

[13]  Petros G. Voulgaris,et al.  On optimal ℓ∞ to ℓ∞ filtering , 1995, Autom..

[14]  Dan S. Henningson,et al.  Linear feedback control and estimation of transition in plane channel flow , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  P. Ioannou,et al.  Turbulence suppression by active control , 1996 .

[16]  T. Bewley,et al.  Skin friction and pressure: the “footprints” of turbulence , 2004 .

[17]  T. Bewley,et al.  State estimation in wall-bounded flow systems. Part 1. Perturbed laminar flows , 2005, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.