A phenomenographic investigation on the use of iPads among undergraduate art and design students

The increasingly widespread use of iPads in higher education ( HE) brings to the forefront questions about the contribution of these computer tablets towards teaching and learning. However, there is a noticeable gap of research on the instructional potential of iPads in HE. This paper describes the first stage of a research project on the use of iPads in undergraduate art and design disciplines, and is a collaboration between the research lab 'Networked Learning Technologies in Art and Design' at Cyprus University of Technology, and the 'Centre for Pedagogic Research' at Falmouth University in England. The participants from both institutions provided a student-centred perspective, and the qualitative analysis (phenomenography) revealed varied perceptions. Based on the findings of this project, the implication is that there are a number of challenges and obstacles in embedding the use of iPads in art and design education. Further research in the second stage of this collaborative research will investigate the views and motivations of art and design faculty. A video abstract of this article can be viewed at [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[1]  Fatos Xhafa,et al.  Using mobile devices to support online collaborative learning , 2010, Mob. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Erny Arniza Ahmad,et al.  The definition and characteristics of ubiquitous learning : A discussion , 2010 .

[3]  Baohui Zhang,et al.  Leveraging mobile technology for sustainable seamless learning: a research agenda , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[4]  Michael Prosser,et al.  Understanding Learning And Teaching , 1999 .

[5]  Lalita Rajasingham,et al.  Will Mobile Learning Bring a Paradigm Shift in Higher Education , 2011 .

[6]  Dirk Frohberg,et al.  Mobile Learning is Coming of Age - What we have and what we still miss , 2006, DeLFI.

[7]  Grant Ellmers,et al.  A re-examination of graphic design pedagogy, and its application at the University of Wollongong: Towards a PhD study in design education , 2005 .

[8]  Mike Sharples,et al.  Towards a Theory of Mobile Learning , 2005 .

[9]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Understanding Learning and Teaching: the experience in higher education , 1999 .

[10]  Steven Wright,et al.  Technologies for learning? An actor-network theory critique of ‘affordances’ in research on mobile learning , 2011 .

[11]  Garry Falloon,et al.  Looking to the future: M-learning with the iPad , 2010 .

[12]  Helen Gartley,et al.  The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education , 2002 .

[13]  M. Pang.  Two Faces of Variation: On continuity in the phenomenographic movement , 2003 .

[14]  J. Traxler.  Defining, Discussing and Evaluating Mobile Learning: The moving finger writes and having writ . . . . , 2007 .

[15]  Willie Miller,et al.  iLearning: The Future of Higher Education? Student Perceptions on Learning with Mobile Tablets , 2012 .

[16]  Thomas Cochrane,et al.  Secrets of Mlearning Failures: Confronting Reality , 2012 .

[17]  Larry Johnson,et al.  The NMC Horizon Report: 2012 Higher Education Edition. , 2012 .

[18]  D. Laurillard.  Pedagogical forms of mobile learning: framing research questions , 2007 .

[19]  Astrid M. Sølvberg,et al.  Learning spaces in mobile learning environments , 2012 .

[20]  Gerlese S. Åkerlind.  Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods , 2005 .

[21]  Sarah A. Douglas,et al.  Managing the Complexity of Design Problems through Studio-Based Learning. , 2011 .

[22]  P. McAndrew,et al.  USING MOBILE DEVICES FOR LEARNING IN INFORMAL SETTINGS: IS IT MOTIVATING? , 2006 .

[24]  F. Marton.  Phenomenography — Describing conceptions of the world around us , 1981 .

[25]  Yeonjeong Park,et al.  A Pedagogical Framework for Mobile Learning: Categorizing Educational Applications of Mobile Technologies into Four Types. , 2011 .