REVIEW OF THE INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE DAYLIGHT PENETRATION IN BUILDING

The innovative daylighting systems can deliver natural light to a space in a building, where insufficient amount of daylight is provided by the routine daylighting systems. The new building forms and users' needs cause in compacted buildings, and thus supporting the high skin-to-volume ratio not achieved. By using a survey of major applications for daylighting systems, this study provides practical advice to building designers and researchers. Many system have been lunched, but challenges, such as high initial cost, utilization difficulties, and application limitations, prevent their widespread use. Survey show that, none of them overcome all associated challenges, but a number of systems efficiently suit different circumstances is a more practical approach. The study makes the capabilities and limitations of the different system and discusses the challenges and promises facing architect and lighting designers.

[1]  Russell P. Leslie,et al.  Capturing the daylight dividend in buildings: why and how? , 2003 .

[2]  L. Curt Maxey,et al.  Flexible Sunlight—The History and Progress of Hybrid Solar Lighting , 2008 .

[3]  Jeong Tai Kim,et al.  Overview and new developments in optical daylighting systems for building a healthy indoor environment , 2010 .

[4]  Aleš Krainer,et al.  LIGHT WELLS IN RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AS A COMPLEMENTARY DAYLIGHT SOURCE , 1999 .

[5]  M. S. Mayhoub,et al.  Innovative daylighting systems’ challenges: A critical study , 2014 .

[6]  Veronica Garcia Hansen,et al.  An assessment tool for selection of appropriate daylighting solutions for buildings in tropical and subtropical regions : Validation using radiance simulation , 2012 .

[7]  Zaid Chalabi,et al.  Impact of climate change on the domestic indoor environment and associated health risks in the UK. , 2015, Environment international.

[8]  Lisa Heschong,et al.  Improving Prediction of Daylighting Performance , 2010 .

[9]  Joel Morrison Callow Daylighting Using Tubular Light Guide Systems , 2003 .

[10]  Friedrich Wilhelm Grimme,et al.  German developments in guidance systems: an overview daylight , 2002 .

[11]  Fabio Peron,et al.  Daylight and energy performances of a new type of light pipe , 2004 .

[12]  Saffa Riffat,et al.  Interactions between louvers and ceiling geometry for maximum daylighting performance. , 2009 .

[13]  Danny H.W. Li,et al.  Determination of vertical daylight illuminance under non-overcast sky conditions , 2010 .

[14]  M. Kischkoweit-Lopin An overview of daylighting systems , 2002 .

[15]  Koen Steemers,et al.  Daylight Design Of Buildings , 2002 .

[16]  Jitka Mohelníková Tubular light guide evaluation , 2009 .

[17]  Sergio Altomonte,et al.  Daylight for Energy Savings and Psycho-Physiological Well-Being in Sustainable Built Environments , 2009 .

[18]  Koen Steemers,et al.  Advanced daylighting systems , 2014 .

[19]  Finn Harken Kristiansen,et al.  Super insulating aerogel glazing , 2005 .

[20]  Chen Wang,et al.  Daylighting can be fluorescent: Development of a fiber solar concentrator and test for its indoor illumination , 2010 .

[21]  Michael Hirning The application of luminance mapping to discomfort glare : a modified glare index for green buildings , 2014 .

[22]  Stephen Selkowitz,et al.  Innovative Daylighting Systems , 2017 .

[23]  T. A. Wright,et al.  Psychological well-being and job satisfaction as predictors of job performance. , 2000, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[24]  Ahmed A. Freewan,et al.  Improving daylight performance of light wells in residential buildings: Nourishing compact sustainable urban form , 2014 .

[25]  Inger Andresen,et al.  A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method for Solar Building Design , 2000 .