The Role of Cognitive Ability in Self‐Efficacy and Self‐Assessed Test Performance1

Research has shown that test takers are often unable to assess their own test performance accurately. However, the role of cognitive ability in assessing one's test performance has not been explored. We examined whether high cognitive ability participants were better than low cognitive ability participants in assessing their performance on a video-based situational judgment test (SJT) of customer-service skills. Results indicated a strong relationship between actual and perceived SJT performance for high cognitive ability participants, but no relationship for those low in cognitive ability. The discussion focuses on implications for metacognitive theory, test perceptions, and providing feedback to applicants.

[1]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Perceived Readiness for Examination Performance (PREP) Produced by Initial Reading of Text and Text Containing Adjunct Questions. , 1987 .

[2]  S. Gilliland,et al.  Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system. , 1994 .

[3]  A. Ryan.  Explaining the Black-White Test Score Gap: The Role of Test Perceptions , 2001 .

[4]  Aleksander P. J. Ellis,et al.  Race and Cognitive‐Ability Test Performance: The Mediating Effects of Test Preparation, Test‐Taking Strategy Use and Self‐Eff icacy , 2003 .

[5]  David Chan,et al.  Applicant Perceptions of Test Fairness: Integrating Justice and Self-Serving Bias Perspectives , 1998 .

[6]  David E. Smith,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF APPLICANTs' REACTIONS TO COGNITIVE ABILITY TESTS AND AN ASSESSMENT CENTER , 1994 .

[7]  Richard A. Posthuma,et al.  Do Procedural Justice Perceptions in a Selection Testing Context Predict Applicant Attraction and Intention Toward the Organization , 2004 .

[8]  J. Colquitt,et al.  Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: a meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  J. Brockner,et al.  An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Toward an Explanation of Applicant Reactions: An Examination of Organizational Justice and Attribution Frameworks. , 1997, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[11]  Ann Marie Ryan,et al.  Test-taking dispositions: A missing link? , 1992 .

[12]  Linda S. Gottfredson,et al.  Where and Why g Matters:Not a Mystery , 2002 .

[13]  N. Schmitt,et al.  Test Preparation Activities and Employment Test Performance , 2001 .

[14]  C. Dodrill,et al.  Long-term reliability of the Wonderlic Personnel Test. , 1983 .

[15]  Michael A. Campion,et al.  Longitudinal Assessment of Applicant Reactions to Employment Testing and Test Outcome Feedback , 1998 .

[16]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Applicants’ Perceptions of Selection Procedures and Decisions: A Critical Review and Agenda for the Future , 2000 .

[17]  Richard D. Arvey,et al.  MOTIVATIONAL COMPONENTS OF TEST TAKING , 1990 .

[18]  E. Salas,et al.  Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. , 1993 .

[19]  S. Gilliland.  The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems: An Organizational Justice Perspective , 1993 .

[20]  Thomas R. Carretta,et al.  Role of ability and prior knowledge in complex training performance. , 1995 .

[21]  Selection fairness information and applicant reactions: a longitudinal field study. , 2002 .

[22]  Donald M. Truxillo,et al.  Development and examination of an expectancy-based measure of test-taking motivation. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  Ralph A. Alexander,et al.  Rating ability in performance judgments: The joint influence of implicit theories and intelligence , 1991 .

[24]  Jeff A. Weekley,et al.  Video-based situational testing. , 1997 .

[25]  J. Kruger,et al.  Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Linda Bol,et al.  Test prediction and performance in a classroom context. , 2000 .

[27]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Test Preparation Programs in Selection Contexts: Self-Selection and Program Effectiveness , 1998 .