Fracture strength of four-unit Y-TZP FPD cores designed with varying connector diameter. An in-vitro study.

Reported clinical success rates of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures (FPDs) made of high-strength oxide ceramics range between 82.5% and 100%. The main cause of all-ceramic FPD failure is fracture in the connector area. There is, however, no consensus on what connector dimensions are adequate. The aim of this in-vitro study was, therefore, to compare the fracture strength of four-unit Y-TZP FPD cores designed with different connector diameters. A total of 40 four-unit FPD cores supported by end abutments and having two pontics were manufactured in Procera Zirconia. Five groups of FPD cores with connector dimensions of 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 and 4.0 mm were produced. All FPD cores underwent a firing programme according to the manufacturer's recommendations for the veneering porcelain, a cyclic preload, thermocycling and finally, load until fracture. Fracture strength was significantly higher for each increase in connector diameter except for the 2.0-mm and 2.5-mm diameters where all fractures occurred during preload. All FPD cores fractured in the connector area. Within the limitations of this in-vitro study, a minimum diameter of 4.0 mm is recommended for all-ceramic zirconia-based FPDs with long spans or replacing molars. Clinical studies are, however, needed to determine adequate connector dimensions.

[1]  H Fischer,et al.  Lifetime Prediction of All-ceramic Bridges by Computational Methods , 2003, Journal of dental research.

[2]  P Carlson,et al.  All-ceramic fixed partial dentures designed according to the DC-Zirkon technique. A 2-year clinical study. , 2005, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[3]  V. Lassila,et al.  Bite force and its correlations in different denture types. , 1985, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[4]  G. Sjögren,et al.  Fracture resistance of yttrium oxide partially-stabilized zirconia all-ceramic bridges after veneering and mechanical fatigue testing. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[5]  F. F. Wang,et al.  Influence of Reaction Products on Reaction Between Water and Soda‐Lime‐Silica Glass , 1958 .

[6]  L. Gauckler,et al.  Cyclic fatigue in water of veneer-framework composites for all-ceramic dental bridges. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[7]  J R Kelly,et al.  Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  T. Dérand,et al.  Fracture strength of In-Ceram all-ceramic bridges in relation to cervical shape and try-in procedure. An in-vitro study. , 2000, The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry.

[9]  P. Vult von Steyern,et al.  Use of abutment-teeth vs. dental implants to support all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: an in-vitro study on fracture strength. , 2005, Swedish dental journal.

[10]  J. F. Bates,et al.  Masticatory function - a review of the literature. III. Masticatory performance and efficiency. , 1976, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[11]  María Jesús Suárez,et al.  Three-year clinical evaluation of In-Ceram Zirconia posterior FPDs. , 2004, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[12]  S. Bayne,et al.  Stress concentration in all-ceramic posterior fixed partial dentures. , 1996, Quintessence international.

[13]  P. Vult von Steyern,et al.  Five-year evaluation of posterior all-ceramic three-unit (In-Ceram) FPDs. , 2001, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[14]  L. Pröbster Survival rate of In-Ceram restorations. , 1993, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[15]  G. Sjögren,et al.  Fracture resistance of all-ceramic zirconia bridges with differing phase stabilizers and quality of sintering. , 2006, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[16]  J. F. Bates,et al.  Masticatory function-a review of the literature: (II) Speed of movement of the mandible, rate of chewing and forces developed in chewing. , 1975, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[17]  J A Tesk,et al.  Failure of All-ceramic Fixed Partial Dentures in vitro and in vivo: Analysis and Modeling , 1995, Journal of dental research.

[18]  M. Könönen,et al.  Maximal bite force and its association with signs and symptoms of craniomandibular disorders in young Finnish non-patients. , 1995, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[19]  P Schärer,et al.  Reliability and strength of all-ceramic dental restorations fabricated by direct ceramic machining (DCM). , 2001, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[20]  Ariel J Raigrodski,et al.  The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconium-oxide-based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses: a prospective clinical pilot study. , 2006, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[21]  J. Tinschert,et al.  Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study. , 2001, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[22]  Bernt Andersson,et al.  A long-term retrospective and clinical follow-up study of In-Ceram Alumina FPDs. , 2003, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[23]  Won-Suck Oh,et al.  Effect of connector design on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[24]  G E Carlsson,et al.  Bite force and state of dentition. , 1977, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[25]  Kenneth J Anusavice,et al.  Clinical performance of a lithia disilicate-based core ceramic for three-unit posterior FPDs. , 2004, The International journal of prosthodontics.