Implementing Mobility as a Service

This paper presents insights from a six-month field operational test (FOT) in Gothenburg, Sweden, during which 195 participants tested the UbiGo mobility service for everyday travel. The service integrated both public and private solutions into a new type of collective transport and thereby contributed to Swedish societal goals of a reduction of private car use and ownership. A triangulation approach to data sources and collection methods was adopted to identify matches and mismatches between the expectations and experiences of three stakeholder groups: users (FOT participants–customers), commercial actors (mobility broker and service providers), and society. Identified matches included the concept of a transportation smorgasbord, reduced private car ownership, and increased pretrip planning. Identified mismatches related to the greater than expected reduction in car use, the respective business models of the mobility broker and service providers, back-office administration, and the smartphone platform. Gaps included the infeasibility of some trips and the need for more carsharing sites. The FOT was successful, with 93% of participants satisfied with their travel and 97% wanting to continue using UbiGo. However, before a commercially viable mobility service can be created, the mismatches and gaps need to be resolved or at least deliberated. The conclusion is that to create integrated solutions, truly collective transport must involve close cooperation between public and private actors and the consideration of at least the three, sometimes conflicting, stakeholder perspectives. Furthermore, new business models are needed to address the challenges associated with future integrated urban mobility solutions.

[1]  Alice Bieszczat,et al.  Carsharing: Review of Its Public Benefits and Level of Taxation , 2012 .

[2]  Jessica ter Schure,et al.  Cumulative Impacts of Carsharing and Unbundled Parking on Vehicle Ownership and Mode Choice , 2012 .

[3]  MariAnne Karlsson,et al.  Travelers’ Motives for Adopting a New, Innovative Travel Service: Insights from the UbiGo Field Operational Test in Gothenburg, Sweden , 2014 .

[4]  Tor Skoglund,et al.  Appreciated–but with a Fading Grace of Novelty! Traveller's Assessment of, Usage of and Behavioural Change given Access to a Co-modal Travel Planner , 2012 .

[5]  Laurent Dauby,et al.  The Future of Urban Mobility 2.0: Imperatives to Shape Extended Mobility Ecosystems of Tomorrow , 2014 .

[6]  Graham Currie,et al.  Effective ways to grow urban bus markets: a synthesis of evidence , 2007 .

[7]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  North American Carsharing , 2009 .

[8]  Susan Shaheen,et al.  Growth in Worldwide Carsharing , 2007 .

[9]  Graham. Parkhurst,et al.  Qualitative Insights into the Effect on Travel Behavior of Joining a Carshare , 2013 .

[10]  S. Heikkilä Mobility as a Service - A Proposal for Action for the Public Administration, Case Helsinki , 2014 .

[11]  Karl Kottenhoff,et al.  Dynamic at-stop real-time information displays for public transport: effects on customers , 2007 .

[12]  Karthik K. Srinivasan,et al.  Impact of Mobile Phones on Travel: Empirical Analysis of Activity Chaining, Ridesharing, and Virtual Shopping , 2006 .

[13]  Adam Millard-Ball,et al.  Who Is Attracted to Carsharing , 2006 .

[14]  Gary T. Henry,et al.  Driving less for better air: Impacts of a public information campaign , 2003 .

[15]  Simon Batterbury,et al.  Environmental Activism and Social Networks: Campaigning for Bicycles and Alternative Transport in West London , 2003 .

[16]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[17]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[18]  Andres Monzon,et al.  Quality of Bus Services Performance: Benefits of Real Time Passenger Information Systems , 2013 .