Nature vs. Nurture: Evidence for Social Learning of Conflict Behaviour in Grizzly Bears

The propensity for a grizzly bear to develop conflict behaviours might be a result of social learning between mothers and cubs, genetic inheritance, or both learning and inheritance. Using non-invasive genetic sampling, we collected grizzly bear hair samples during 2011–2014 across southwestern Alberta, Canada. We targeted private agricultural lands for hair samples at grizzly bear incident sites, defining an incident as an occurrence in which the grizzly bear caused property damage, obtained anthropogenic food, or killed or attempted to kill livestock or pets. We genotyped 213 unique grizzly bears (118 M, 95 F) at 24 microsatellite loci, plus the amelogenin marker for sex. We used the program COLONY to assign parentage. We evaluated 76 mother-offspring relationships and 119 father-offspring relationships. We compared the frequency of problem and non-problem offspring from problem and non-problem parents, excluding dependent offspring from our analysis. Our results support the social learning hypothesis, but not the genetic inheritance hypothesis. Offspring of problem mothers are more likely to be involved in conflict behaviours, while offspring from non-problem mothers are not likely to be involved in incidents or human-bear conflicts themselves (Barnard’s test, p = 0.05, 62.5% of offspring from problem mothers were problem bears). There was no evidence that offspring are more likely to be involved in conflict behaviour if their fathers had been problem bears (Barnard’s test, p = 0.92, 29.6% of offspring from problem fathers were problem bears). For the mother-offspring relationships evaluated, 30.3% of offspring were identified as problem bears independent of their mother’s conflict status. Similarly, 28.6% of offspring were identified as problem bears independent of their father’s conflict status. Proactive mitigation to prevent female bears from becoming problem individuals likely will help prevent the perpetuation of conflicts through social learning.

[1]  K. Laland.  Social learning strategies , 2004, Learning & behavior.

[2]  K. Scribner,et al.  Parentage and sibship inference from markers in polyploids , 2014, Molecular ecology resources.

[3]  J. Cham.  Effects of aversive conditioning on behavior of nuisance Louisiana black bears , 2008 .

[4]  A. Sameroff.  A unified theory of development: a dialectic integration of nature and nurture. , 2010, Child development.

[5]  D. Queller,et al.  ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[6]  John A. Shivik,et al.  Nonlethal Techniques for Managing Predation: Primary and Secondary Repellents , 2003 .

[7]  B. M. Blanchard,et al.  Biological consequences of relocating grizzly bears in the Yellowstone ecosystem , 1995 .

[8]  G. Barnard,et al.  A New Test for 2 × 2 Tables , 1945, Nature.

[9]  K. Laland,et al.  Social Learning in Animals: Empirical Studies and Theoretical Models , 2005 .

[10]  J. Wang,et al.  Parentage and Sibship Inference From Multilocus Genotype Data Under Polygamy , 2009, Genetics.

[11]  John D. C. Linnell,et al.  Translocation of carnivores as a method for managing problem animals: a review , 1997, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[12]  N. Barton.  The role of hybridization in evolution , 2001, Molecular ecology.

[13]  A. Jones,et al.  Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[14]  G. Jones,et al.  Relative accuracy of three common methods of parentage analysis in natural populations , 2013, Molecular ecology.

[15]  Petter Laake,et al.  Recommended tests for association in 2×2 tables , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  C. Anderson.  GRIZZLY BEAR-CATTLE INTERACTIONS ON TWO GRAZING ALLOTMENTS IN NORTHWEST WYOMING , 2007 .

[17]  Alan C. Kamil,et al.  Foraging behavior: ecological, ethological, and psychological approaches , 1980 .

[18]  S. Riechert,et al.  Genetically-based variation between two spider populations in foraging behavior , 1989, Oecologia.

[19]  G. Stenhouse,et al.  Grizzly Bear Population Vital Rates and Trend in the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem, Montana , 2012 .

[20]  J. L. Gittleman.  Carnivore brain size, behavioral ecology and phylogeny , 1986 .

[21]  F. Galton.  Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development , 1883 .

[22]  C. Heyes,et al.  Social learning in animals : the roots of culture , 1996 .

[23]  G. White,et al.  Trajectory of the yellowstone grizzly bear population under alternative survival rates , 2006 .

[24]  J. Broderick,et al.  Stochasticity in Natural Forage Production Affects Use of Urban Areas by Black Bears: Implications to Management of Human-Bear Conflicts , 2014, PloS one.

[25]  K. Gibson,et al.  Mammalian social learning : comparative and ecological perspectives , 1999 .

[26]  Tabitha A. Graves,et al.  Demographic mechanisms underpinning genetic assimilation of remnant groups of a large carnivore , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  G. Barnard,et al.  A New Test for 2 × 2 Tables , 1945 .

[28]  Jinlian Wang,et al.  COLONY: a program for parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data , 2010, Molecular ecology resources.

[29]  D. P. A E T K A U,et al.  An empirical exploration of data quality in DNA-based population inventories , 2003 .

[30]  Francis Galton,et al.  English men of science : their nature and nurture , 1874 .

[31]  R. D. Spencer,et al.  How Agencies Respond to Human–black Bear Conflicts: A Survey of Wildlife Agencies in North America , 2007 .

[32]  Michael J. Chamberlain,et al.  Effects of aversive conditioning on behavior of nuisance Louisiana black bears , 2008 .

[33]  F. Fontúrbel,et al.  Translocations and human-carnivore conflicts: problem solving or problem creating? , 2011 .

[34]  K. A. Paczolt,et al.  A practical guide to methods of parentage analysis , 2010, Molecular ecology resources.

[35]  S. Riley,et al.  Translocation of Nuisance Grizzly Bears in Northwestern Montana , 1994 .

[36]  O. Liberg,et al.  Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes , 2014, Science.

[37]  G. White,et al.  Re‐Evaluation of Yellowstone Grizzly Bear Population Dynamics not Supported by Empirical Data: Response to Doak & Cutler , 2014 .

[38]  H. Rajabi-Maham,et al.  Both Environment and Genetic Makeup Influence Sexual Behavior of House Mouse , 2018 .

[39]  G. Stenhouse,et al.  Grizzly Ursus arctos and black bear U. americanus densities in the interior mountains of North America , 2005 .

[40]  G. Stenhouse,et al.  Does Learning or Instinct Shape Habitat Selection? , 2013, PloS one.

[41]  Jinliang Wang,et al.  Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors. , 2004, Genetics.

[42]  K. Laland,et al.  Social intelligence, innovation, and enhanced brain size in primates , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  G. Stenhouse,et al.  Population fragmentation and inter-ecosystem movements of grizzly bears in western Canada and the northern United States , 2012 .

[44]  L. Pokrovskaya.  Foraging activity and food selection in Asiatic black bear orphaned cubs in absence of social learning from a mother , 2015 .

[45]  Louis Lefebvre,et al.  CHAPTER 6 – Is Social Learning an Adaptive Specialization? , 1996 .

[46]  C. Heyes,et al.  SOCIAL LEARNING IN ANIMALS: CATEGORIES AND MECHANISMS , 1994, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[47]  T. C. Marshall,et al.  Statistical confidence for likelihood‐based paternity inference in natural populations , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[48]  S. Kark,et al.  Abrupt spatial and numerical responses of overabundant foxes to a reduction in anthropogenic resources , 2010 .

[49]  Katherine C. Kendall,et al.  Demography and Genetic Structure of a Recovering Grizzly Bear Population , 2009 .

[50]  Gordon B. Stenhouse,et al.  Agricultural lands as ecological traps for grizzly bears , 2012 .

[51]  S. Kalinowski,et al.  A proposed lexicon of terms and concepts for human–bear management in North America , 2010 .

[52]  M. Proctor,et al.  Gender-specific dispersal distances of grizzly bears estimated by genetic analysis , 2004 .

[53]  D. Paetkau,et al.  THE OPTIMAL NUMBER OF MARKERS IN GENETIC CAPTURE–MARK–RECAPTURE STUDIES , 2004 .

[54]  S. Herrero,et al.  GRIZZLY BEAR DEMOGRAPHICS IN AND AROUND BANFF NATIONAL PARK AND KANANASKIS COUNTRY, ALBERTA , 2005 .

[55]  N. Selva,et al.  Spatial patterns in brown bear Ursus arctos diet: the role of geographical and environmental factors , 2012 .

[56]  J. Hopkins.  Use of genetics to investigate socially learned foraging behavior in free-ranging black bears , 2013 .

[57]  M. Fondrk,et al.  Genetic determinants of honey bee foraging behaviour , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[58]  G. Barnard.  Significance tests for 2 X 2 tables. , 1947, Biometrika.

[59]  I. Stirling,et al.  Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears , 1995, Molecular ecology.

[60]  D. Mattson,et al.  Landscape conditions predisposing grizzly bears to conflicts on private agricultural lands in the western USA , 2006 .

[61]  D. Mattson,et al.  Natural landscape features, human-related attractants, and conflict hotspots: a spatial analysis of human–grizzly bear conflicts , 2005 .

[62]  B. Galef,et al.  Interaction of social and individual learning in food preferences of Norway rats , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[63]  Rachel L. Mazur,et al.  Does Aversive Conditioning Reduce Human–Black Bear Conflict? , 2010 .

[64]  C. Gillin,et al.  EVALUATION OF AN AVERSIVE CONDITIONING TECHNIQUE USED ON FEMALE GRIZZLY BEARS IN THE YELLOWSTONE ECOSYSTEM , 1994 .

[65]  M. Boyce,et al.  Grizzly bears without borders: Spatially explicit capture–recapture in southwestern Alberta , 2016 .

[66]  Men of Science, their Nature and their Nurture , 1874, Nature.

[67]  M. Meagher,et al.  The consequences of protecting problem grizzly bears , 1989 .

[68]  Victoria Seher,et al.  Socially learned foraging behaviour in wild black bears, Ursus americanus , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[69]  David A. Roon,et al.  Grizzly Bear Density in Glacier National Park, Montana , 2008 .

[70]  J. Berger,et al.  USING BLACK BEARS TO TEST IDEAL-FREE DISTRIBUTION MODELS EXPERIMENTALLY , 2003 .

[71]  J. Beecham,et al.  Using Genetic Relatedness to Investigate the Development of Conflict Behavior in Black Bears , 2008 .