Why and How Membrane Bioreactors with Unsteady Filtration Conditions Can Improve the Efficiency of Biological Processes

Abstract: A membrane bioreactor (MBR), an association of a bioreactor with a crossflow filtration unit, enables continuous processes with total cell retention within the reactor to be realized. Provided that high dilution rates can be applied and that inhibition processes are avoided, very high biomass concentrations can be reached, thereby improving the volumetric productivities. These membrane bioreactors have been successfully applied to various microbial bioconversion, such as alcoholic fermentation, solvents, organic acid production, starters, and wastewater treatment. On the basis of the biological reaction characteristics and bibliographic results, the potentialities and bottlenecks of this methodology are discussed. Depending on the application, it is shown how the performance of the membrane bioreactor can be enhanced by acting either on the biological reaction achievement, by controlling the balance between cell growth and death, or on the dilution rate, by increasing the permeate flux through the filtration unit. This discussion is based on results obtained in specific biological treatments applied to polluted liquid and gas.

[1]  P. Gerhardt,et al.  Microfiltration cell‐recycle pilot system for continuous thermoanaerobic production of exo‐β‐amylase , 1989, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[2]  M. Narodoslawsky,et al.  Modelling of alcohol fermentation in a tubular reactor with high biomass recycle , 1988 .

[3]  C. Fonade,et al.  Yeast suspension filtration: flux enhancement using an upward gas/liquid slug flow-application to continuous alcoholic fermentation with cell recycle. , 1998, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[4]  J L Moreira,et al.  Operational patterns affecting lactic acid production in ultrafiltration cell recycle bioreactor , 1995, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[5]  N. Lindley,et al.  Carbon and energy flux constraints in continuous cultures of Alcaligenes eutrophus grown on phenol. , 1998, Microbiology.

[6]  C. Fonade,et al.  Feasibility Study of a Compact Process for Biological Treatment of Highly Soluble VOCs Polluted Gaseous Effluent , 2001, Biotechnology progress.

[7]  Thomas M. Peters,et al.  Membrane bioreactors in wastewater treatment , 2000 .

[8]  G. Goma,et al.  Continuous alcoholic fermentation withSaccharomyces cerevisiae recycle by tangential filtration: Key points for process modelling , 1994, Biotechnology Letters.

[9]  G Goma,et al.  High‐concentration cultivation of Lactococcus cremoris in a cell‐recycle reactor , 1991, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[10]  Campbell W. Robinson,et al.  Substrate inhibition kinetics: Phenol degradation by Pseudomonas putida , 1975 .

[11]  C. Cooney,et al.  Production of ethanol by Clostridium thermosaccharolyticum: I. Effect of cell recycle and environmental parameters , 1989, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[12]  G. Goma,et al.  Fermentation coupled with microfiltration: kinetics of ethanol fermentation with cell recycle , 1987 .

[13]  M. Madec,et al.  Concentrated starter productions in a two stage cell-recycle bioreactor plant , 1992, Biotechnology Letters.

[14]  R. Marchal,et al.  Butyric fermentation: metabolic behaviour and production performance of Clostridium tyrobutyricum in a continuous culture with cell recycle , 1990, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[15]  G. Goma,et al.  Towards a reduction in excess sludge production in activated sludge processes: biomass physicochemical treatment and biodegradation , 1999, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[16]  M. Cheryan,et al.  Lactic acid from cheese whey permeate. Productivity and economics of a continuous membrane bioreactor , 1995, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[17]  N. Lindley,et al.  Novel Membrane Bioreactor with Gas/Liquid Two‐Phase Flow for High‐Performance Degradation of Phenol , 1998, Biotechnology progress.

[18]  G. Goma,et al.  Membrane bioreactors for the evaluation of maintenance phenomena in wastewater treatment , 1990 .

[19]  M. Mercier-Bonin,et al.  Hydrodynamics of slug flow applied to cross‐flow filtration in narrow tubes , 2000 .

[20]  M. Cheryan,et al.  Hollow fibre bioreactor for ethanol production: application to the conversion of lactose by Kluyveromyces fragilis. , 1984 .

[21]  M. Mercier-Bonin,et al.  Enzyme Transmission during Crossflow Filtration of Yeast Suspensions Using Gas/Liquid Two‐Phase Flows , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[22]  G. Goma,et al.  Acetonobutylic fermentation: Improvement of performances by coupling continuous fermentation and ultrafiltration , 1986, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[23]  Patrick Boyaval,et al.  Continuous lactic acid fermentation with concentrated product recovery by ultrafiltration and electrodialysis , 1987, Biotechnology Letters.

[24]  C. Shin,et al.  Performance, kinetics, and substrate utilization in a continuous yeast fermentation with cell recycle by ultrafiltration membranes , 2004, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[25]  S. Pirt.  The maintenance energy of bacteria in growing cultures , 1965, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[26]  M. Cheryan,et al.  Continuous production of acetate by Clostridium thermoaceticum in a cell-recycle membrane bioreactor , 1994 .

[27]  J. M. Engasser,et al.  Continuous acetone-butanol fermentation with high productivity by cell ultrafiltration and recycling , 1986, Biotechnology Letters.

[28]  G. Goma,et al.  High yeast concentration in continuous fermentation with cell recycle obtained by tangential microfiltration , 1987, Biotechnology Letters.

[29]  G. Goma,et al.  Decreased sludge production strategy for domestic wastewater treatment , 1994 .

[30]  D. Leak,et al.  Cultivation of an L‐lactate dehydrogenase mutant of Bacillus stearothermophilus in continuous culture with cell recycle , 1994, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[31]  C. Fonade,et al.  How slug flow can enhance the ultrafiltration flux in mineral tubular membranes , 1997 .

[32]  R. Stanier,et al.  Dissimilation of Aromatic Compounds by Alcaligenes eutrophus , 1971, Journal of bacteriology.

[33]  R. Bayly,et al.  Control of catechol meta-cleavage pathway in Alcaligenes eutrophus , 1983, Journal of bacteriology.

[34]  Munir Cheryan,et al.  Starch to lactic acid in a continuous membrane bioreactor , 1994 .

[35]  G. Goma,et al.  Propionic acid fermentation: improvement of performances by coupling continuous fermentation and ultrafiltration , 1987 .

[36]  H. Chang,et al.  High density cell culture by membrane-based cell recycle. , 1994, Biotechnology advances.

[37]  M. Mercier-Bonin.  Influence of a gas/liquid two-phase flow on the ultrafiltration and microfiltration performances: case of a ceramic flat sheet membrane , 2000 .

[38]  A. Mawson,et al.  Ethanol production from whey in a membrane recycle bioreactor. , 1993 .

[39]  G. Hill,et al.  Continuous cell recycle fermentation to produce ethanol. , 1994 .

[40]  M. Mercier-Bonin,et al.  How unsteady filtration conditions can improve the process efficiency during cell cultures in membrane bioreactors , 2001 .

[41]  C. Cabassud,et al.  Air sparging in ultrafiltration hollow fibers: relationship between flux enhancement, cake characteristics and hydrodynamic parameters , 2001 .

[42]  G. Goma,et al.  Kinetics of inhibition in propionic acid fermentation , 1987 .

[43]  Zhanfeng Cui,et al.  Flux enhancements with gas sparging in downwards crossflow ultrafiltration: performance and mechanism , 1996 .

[44]  S. Nagai,et al.  Ethanol Production by Cell Recycling with Hollow Fibers , 1983 .

[45]  P. Boyaval,et al.  Production of propionic acid from whey permeate by sequential fermentation, ultrafiltration, and cell recycling , 1993, Biotechnology and bioengineering.