, 2nd Ed.

The conclusions presented in the STUK report series are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of STUK 3 STUK-A231 TAPIOVAARA Markku, SIISKONEN Teemu. PCXMC. A Monte Carlo program for calculating patient doses in medical x-ray examinations. STUK-A231. Helsinki 2008, 49 pp. Summary PCXMC is a Monte Carlo program for calculating patients' organ doses and effective doses in medical x-ray examinations. The organs and tissues considered in the program are: active bone marrow The program calculates the effective dose with both the present tissue weighting factors of ICRP Publication 103 (2007) and the old tissue weighting factors of ICRP Publication 60 (1991). The anatomical data are based on the mathematical hermaphrodite phantom models of Cristy and Eckerman (1987), which describe patients of six different ages: newborn , 1, 5, 10, 15-year-old and adult patients. Some changes are made to these phantoms in order to make them more realistic for external irradiation conditions and to enable the calculation of the effective dose according to the new ICRP Publication 103 tissue weighting factors. The phantom sizes are adjustable to mimic patients of an arbitrary weight and height. PCXMC allows a free adjustment of the x-ray beam projection and other examination conditions of projection radiography and fluoroscopy. All organ doses calculated by PCXMC are relative to the incident air kerma, K a,i. This quantity represents the air kerma at the point where the central axis of the x-ray beam enters the patient. It is given in units of milligray (mGy), free-in-air, without backscatter; see ICRU 74 (2005). The user must supply this datum to the program. The amount of radiation can also be input as the entrance exposure (mR, free-in-air, without backscatter), air kerma-area product or dose-area product (mGy·cm 2), or exposure-area product (R·cm 2). If radiation measurements are not available, the program is able to estimate the incident air kerma also from an input of the x-ray tube current-time product (mAs). The dose calculation method in PCXMC is the Monte Carlo method. The Monte Carlo calculation of photon transport is based on stochastic mathematical simulation of interactions between photons and matter. Photons are emitted (in a fictitious mathematical sense) from a point source into the solid angle specified by the focal distance and the x-ray field dimensions, and followed while they randomly interact with the phantom according to the probability distributions of the physical processes that they …

[1]  Amrik Singh Fifty Years of Higher Education in India: The Role of the University Grants Commission , 2004 .

[2]  T. Weisskopf Affirmative Action in the United States and India: A Comparative Perspective , 2004 .

[3]  Stephen Corich,et al.  Instructional Design in the Real World: A View from the Trenches , 2004, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[4]  Michael Coghlan,et al.  Online Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice , 2004, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[5]  D. Kirp Shakespeare, Einstein, and the Bottom Line: The Marketing of Higher Education , 2003 .

[6]  K. Bentley Learning That Lasts: Integrating Learning, Development, and Performance in College and Beyond , 2003 .

[7]  J. Geleijns,et al.  Monte Carlo calculations for assessment of radiation dose to patients with congenital heart defects and to staff during cardiac catheterizations. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[8]  W E Bolch,et al.  A comparison of newborn stylized and tomographic models for dose assessment in paediatric radiology. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Maryellen Weimer,et al.  Learner-Centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice , 2013 .

[10]  W. McDonald Creating Campus Community: In Search of Ernest Boyer's Legacy , 2007 .

[11]  T. Kerry Explaining and Questioning , 2002 .

[12]  Jeffrey D. Wilhelm,et al.  Action Strategies for Deepening Comprehension , 2002 .

[13]  J. Valentin Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: reference values , 2002, Annals of the ICRP.

[14]  W. Berlinghoff,et al.  Math Through the Ages: A Gentle History for Teachers and Others , 2002 .

[15]  N Petoussi-Henss,et al.  Organ dose conversion coefficients for external photon irradiation of male and female voxel models , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  S. Hannabuss A Companion to Cultural Studies , 2002 .

[17]  Chris Jones,et al.  Networked Learning: Perspectives and Issues , 2001 .

[18]  R. Diamond,et al.  Field guide to academic leadership , 2002 .

[19]  B. Wall,et al.  Radiation exposure of the UK population from medical and dental X-ray examinations. , 2001 .

[20]  D. Dance,et al.  Conversion factors for the estimation of effective dose in paediatric cardiac angiography , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Kenneth W. Borland Student Development in College: Theory, Research, and Practice (review) , 2000 .

[22]  Karl A. Smith,et al.  Strategies for energizing large classes : from small groups to learning communities , 2000 .

[23]  S. Brookfield,et al.  Discussion as a Way of Teaching: Tools and Techniques for Democratic Classrooms , 1999 .

[24]  W E Bolch,et al.  MIRD Pamphlet No. 15: Radionuclide S values in a revised dosimetric model of the adult head and brain. Medical Internal Radiation Dose. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  Christopher Winch,et al.  Key concepts in the philosophy of education , 1999 .

[26]  Annette Mills-Jones,et al.  Active Learning in IS Education: Choosing Effective Strategies for Teaching Large Classes in Higher Education , 1999 .

[27]  J. Wade Estimation of effective dose in diagnostic radiology from entrance surface dose and dose-area product measurements. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[28]  N Petoussi-Henss,et al.  Calculation of backscatter factors for diagnostic radiology using Monte Carlo methods. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  Malcolm Goodale,et al.  Professional presentations : a video-based course , 1998 .

[30]  J. Greenwood Activity Box : A Resource Book for Teachers of Young Students , 1997 .

[31]  J. M. Collins Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher , 1997 .

[32]  I. McMillan,et al.  Changing Minds , 2000 .

[33]  S. Mattsson,et al.  On the calculation of effective dose to children and adolescents , 1996 .

[34]  K. F. Eckerman,et al.  External exposure to radionuclides in air, water, and soil , 1996 .

[35]  B. Wall,et al.  Coefficients for estimating effective doses from paediatric x-ray examinations , 1996 .

[36]  Alice M. Fairhurst,et al.  Effective Teaching, Effective Learning: Making the Personality Connection in Your Classroom , 1995 .

[37]  Icrp Age-dependent doses to members of the public from intake of radionuclides: Part 4 Inhalation dose coefficients , 1995, Annals of the ICRP.

[38]  J. Mattila,et al.  MONITORING OF RADIONUCLIDES IN THE VICINITIES OF FINNISH NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN 1999 - 2001 , 1995 .

[39]  P. Garland,et al.  New Perspectives for Student Affairs Professionals: Evolving Realities, Responsibilities and Roles. ERIC Digest. , 1994 .

[40]  D. Pugh,et al.  How to Get a PhD: A Handbook for Students and Their Supervisors , 1994 .

[41]  John Brooks,et al.  In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms , 1993 .

[42]  P. Stokell SPIDER-1: Software for Evaluating the Detriment Associated with Radiation Exposure , 1993 .

[43]  W. Panzer,et al.  Effective dose — how effective for patients? , 1993, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[44]  K. Weiss,et al.  Definition and estimation of lifetime detriment from radiation exposures: principles and methods. , 1992, Health physics.

[45]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  How college affects students : findings and insights from twenty years of research , 1992 .

[46]  W. G. Cross,et al.  Measurement of Dose Equivalents from External Photon and Electron Radiations , 1992 .

[47]  Icru.,et al.  Phantoms and Computational Models in Therapy, Diagnosis and Protection , 1992 .

[48]  P. Schonken,et al.  Health effects of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation , 1991 .

[49]  P. Andreo Monte Carlo techniques in medical radiation physics. , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[50]  Chris Kyriacou,et al.  Essential Teaching Skills , 1991 .

[51]  R. Geise Optimization of Image Quality and Patient Exposure in Diagnostic Radiology , 1990 .

[52]  Bernd Grosswendt,et al.  Dependence of the photon backscatter factor for water on source-to-phantom distance and irradiation field size , 1990 .

[53]  D A Pierce,et al.  Calculating excess lifetime risk in relative risk models. , 1990, Environmental health perspectives.

[54]  D. Larsen-Freeman Techniques and principles in language teach-ing , 1986 .

[55]  B. Wall,et al.  Organ Doses from Medical X-Ray Examinations Calculated Using Monte Carlo Techniques , 1985 .

[56]  F. Spiers,et al.  Photoelectron enhancement of the absorbed dose from X rays to human bone marrow: experimental and theoretical studies. , 1985, The British journal of radiology.

[57]  G. Kerr,et al.  Neutron and photon fluence-to-dose conversion factors for active marrow of the skeleton , 1984 .

[58]  N. Scmitt Writing to learn. , 1984, Nurse educator.

[59]  B. Joyce,et al.  Models of Teaching , 2024 .

[60]  Gary R. Hanson,et al.  Student Services: A Handbook for the Profession , 1980 .

[61]  T. Beck,et al.  Handbook of selected organ doses for projections common in diagnostic radiology , 1979 .

[62]  R Birch,et al.  Computation of bremsstrahlung X-ray spectra and comparison with spectra measured with a Ge(Li) detector. , 1979, Physics in medicine and biology.

[63]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Atomic form factors, incoherent scattering functions, and photon scattering cross sections , 1975 .

[64]  D. Bligh What's the Use of Lectures? , 1971 .

[65]  Lellery Storm,et al.  Photon cross sections from 1 keV to 100 MeV for elements Z=1 to Z=100 , 1970 .

[66]  J. L. Harrison,et al.  The Government Printing Office , 1968, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[67]  C. Myers Educational Psychology , 1904, Nature.