Anatomical-behavioral relationships: Corpus callosum morphometry and hemispheric specialization

[1]  Robert B. Lufkin,et al.  Corpus callosum morphometry and dichotic listening performace: Individual differences in functional interhemispheric inhibition? , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  V. Denenberg,et al.  Ovarian estrogen acts to feminize the female rat's corpus callosum. , 1993, Brain research. Developmental brain research.

[3]  A. Scheibel,et al.  Fiber composition of the human corpus callosum , 1992, Brain Research.

[4]  A. Scheibel,et al.  Morphometry of the Sylvian fissure and the corpus callosum, with emphasis on sex differences. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  Y. Huang,et al.  Sex but no hand difference in the isthmus of the corpus callosum , 1992, Neurology.

[6]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cognition and the corpus callosum: verbal fluency, visuospatial ability, and language lateralization related to midsagittal surface areas of callosal subregions. , 1992, Behavioral neuroscience.

[7]  Hongkeun Kim,et al.  Sources of between-subjects variability in perceptual asymmetries: A meta-analytic review , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Patricia E Cowell,et al.  Corpus callosum: Demasculinization via perinatal anti-androgen , 1991, International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience.

[9]  V. Denenberg,et al.  A factor analysis of the human's corpus callosum , 1991, Brain Research.

[10]  J. Régis,et al.  Effects of handedness and sex on the morphology of the corpus callosum: A study with brain magnetic resonance imaging , 1991, Brain and Cognition.

[11]  R. Gorski,et al.  Sex differences in the corpus callosum of the living human being , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  Anatomical left‐right asymmetry of language‐related temporal cortex is different in left‐ and right‐handers , 1991, Annals of neurology.

[13]  A. Galaburda,et al.  Individual variability in cortical organization: Its relationship to brain laterality and implications to function , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  P. Rakić,et al.  Cytological and quantitative characteristics of four cerebral commissures in the rhesus monkey , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  S. Rao,et al.  Cerebral disconnection in multiple sclerosis. Relationship to atrophy of the corpus callosum. , 1989, Archives of neurology.

[16]  S. F. Witelson.  Hand and sex differences in the isthmus and genu of the human corpus callosum. A postmortem morphological study. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  A. Rubens,et al.  Interhemispheric transfer in patients with incomplete section of the corpus callosum. Anatomic verification with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1989, Archives of neurology.

[18]  G M Innocenti,et al.  Forms and measures of adult and developing human corpus callosum: Is there sexual dimorphism? , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[19]  R. Graves,et al.  Is interhemispheric transfer related to handedness and gender? , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  J. O’Kusky,et al.  The corpus callosum is larger with right‐hemisphere cerebral speech dominance , 1988, Annals of neurology.

[21]  W. B. Woodhurst,et al.  Results of anterior corpus callosum section in 24 patients with medically intractable seizures , 1988, Neurology.

[22]  W. Smoker,et al.  MR imaging of the corpus callosum: normal and pathologic findings and correlation with CT. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  M. Alexander,et al.  Localization of callosal auditory pathways , 1988, Neurology.

[24]  R. Bleier,et al.  Variations in human corpus callosum do not predict gender: a study using magnetic resonance imaging. , 1988, Behavioral neuroscience.

[25]  J Barbizet,et al.  Posterior callosal infarction. Clinicopathological correlations. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  Andrew Kertesz,et al.  Cerebral dominance, sex, and callosal size inMRI , 1987, Neurology.

[27]  M S Gazzaniga,et al.  No sex‐related differences in human corpus callosum based on magnetic resonance imagery , 1987, Annals of neurology.

[28]  J. Liederman,et al.  Subtraction in addition to addition: dual task performance improves when tasks are presented to separate hemispheres. , 1986, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[29]  G. Innocenti.  General Organization of Callosal Connections in the Cerebral Cortex , 1986 .

[30]  E. Ross,et al.  Topography of the Human Corpus Callosum , 1985, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[31]  S. F. Witelson.  The brain connection: the corpus callosum is larger in left-handers. , 1985, Science.

[32]  N. Geschwind,et al.  Cerebral lateralization. Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: I. A hypothesis and a program for research. , 1985, Archives of neurology.

[33]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Intermanual information transfer in patients with lesions in the trunk of the corpus callosum , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  S. Lederman,et al.  Lateral symmetry in the tactual perception of roughness. , 1984, Canadian journal of psychology.

[35]  N. Cook,et al.  Homotopic callosal inhibition , 1984, Brain and Language.

[36]  B. Jones.  Some problems with Bryden and Sprott's “Statistical determination of degree of lateralization” , 1983, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  M. Banich,et al.  Are variations among right-handed individuals in perceptual asymmetries caused by characteristic arousal differences between hemispheres? , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  V. Denenberg.  Micro and macro theories of the brain , 1983, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[39]  G. Berlucchi.  Two hemispheres but one brain , 1983, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[40]  M. Kinsbourne.  Hemispheric specialization and the growth of human understanding. , 1982, The American psychologist.

[41]  M. P. Bryden,et al.  Laterality: Functional Asymmetry in the Intact Brain , 1982 .

[42]  D. A. Sprott,et al.  Statistical determination of degree of laterality , 1981, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  M S Gazzaniga,et al.  Variability in right hemisphere language function after callosal section: evidence for a continuum of generative capacity , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[44]  M. Jeeves,et al.  Comparison of the effects of transcortical and transcallosal removal of intraventricular tumours. , 1980, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[45]  Innocenti Gm,et al.  The primary visual pathway through the corpus callosum: morphological and functional aspects in the cat , 1980 .

[46]  A R Damasio,et al.  Posterior callosal section in a non-epileptic patient. , 1980, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[47]  M. Jeeves,et al.  Functional consequences of the transcallosal removal of intraventricular tumours. , 1979, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[48]  N. Geschwind,et al.  Right-left asymmetrics in the brain. , 1978, Science.

[49]  Harold Goodglass,et al.  Phonological factors in auditory comprehension in aphasia , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  J. Hellige.  Changes in same-different laterality patterns as a function of practice and stimulus quality , 1976 .

[51]  M. LeMay,et al.  Human brain--morphologic differences in the hemispheres demonstrable by carotid arteriography. , 1972, The New England journal of medicine.

[52]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  R. Sperry,et al.  Absence of deconnexion syndrome in two patients with partial section of the neocommissures. , 1971, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[54]  L. Postman,et al.  Norms of word association , 1970 .

[55]  B Milner,et al.  Lateralized Suppression of Dichotically Presented Digits after Commissural Section in Man , 1968, Science.

[56]  N. Geschwind,et al.  Human Brain: Left-Right Asymmetries in Temporal Speech Region , 1968, Science.

[57]  N. Geschwind,et al.  Dichotic Listening in Man after Section of Neocortical Commissures , 1968 .

[58]  D. Palermo,et al.  An atlas of normative free association data. , 1968 .

[59]  J M VANDERPLAS,et al.  The association value of random shapes. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.