Plasma-based flow control for low-pressure turbines at low-Reynolds-number

Purpose Reynolds number in small-size low-pressure turbines (LPT) can drop below 2.5 · 104 at high altitude cruise, which in turn can lead to laminar boundary layer separation on the suction surface of the blades. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the potential of an alternate current (AC)-driven Single Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuator (AC-SDBDPA) for boundary layer control on the suction side of a LPT blade, operating at a Reynolds number of 2 · 104. Design/methodology/approach Experimental and numerical analyses were conducted. The experimental approach comprised the actuator testing over a curved plate with a shape designed to reproduce the suction surface of a LPT blade. A closed loop wind tunnel was employed. Sinusoidal voltage excitation was tested. Planar velocity measurements were performed by laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV) and particle image velocimetry (PIV). The device electrical power dissipation was also calculated. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations using OpenFOAM© were conducted, modelling the actuator effect as a body force calculated by the dual potential algebraic model. Unsteady RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes equations), also known as URANS approach, with the k-e Lam-Bremhorst Low-Reynolds turbulence model was used. Findings The AC-SDBDPA operation brought to a reduction of the separation region; in particular, the boundary layer thickness and the negative velocity values decreased substantially. Moreover, the flow angle in both the main flow and in the boundary layer was reduced by the plasma control effect. The actuation brought to a reduction of the 17 per cent in the total pressure loss coefficient. The pressure coefficient and skin friction coefficient distributions indicated that under actuation the reattacnment point was displaced upstream, meaning that the flow separation was effectively controlled by the plasma actuation. Adopting slightly higher actuation parameters could bring to a full reattachment of the flow. Practical implications The work underlines the potentialities of an AC-SDBDPA to control separation in LPTs of aeroengines. Originality/value The present work sets a methodological framework, in which the validated procedure to obtain the body force model combined with CFD simulations can be used to study a configuration with multiple actuators allocated in array without requiring further experiments.

[1]  Takayuki Matsunuma.  Unsteady Flow Field of an Axial-Flow Turbine Rotor at a Low Reynolds Number , 2007 .

[2]  Thomas Corke,et al.  Unsteady Plasma Actuators for Separation Control of Low-Pressure Turbine Blades , 2006 .

[3]  Masud Behnia,et al.  Reynolds averaged simulation of unsteady separated flow , 2003 .

[4]  J. Bons,et al.  Combined Blowing and Suction to Control Both Midspan and Endwall Losses in a Turbomachinery Passage , 2010 .

[5]  Terrence W. Simon,et al.  Separation Control Using Plasma Actuators: Steady Flow in Low Pressure Turbines , 2011 .

[6]  Klaus Bremhorst,et al.  A Modified Form of the k-ε Model for Predicting Wall Turbulence , 1981 .

[7]  Antonio Ficarella,et al.  Comparison between synthetic jets and continuous jets for active flow control: Application on a NACA 0015 and a compressor stator cascade , 2015 .

[8]  Marios Kotsonis,et al.  Effect of external flow velocity on momentum transfer of dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators , 2014 .

[9]  Robert J. Moffat,et al.  Describing the Uncertainties in Experimental Results , 1988 .

[10]  Xiaodong Wang,et al.  Numerical Simulations on Flow Separation Within an Axial Turbine at Very Low Reynolds Number , 2015 .

[11]  T. Matsunuma,et al.  Effects of Input Voltage on Flow Separation Control for Low-Pressure Turbine at Low Reynolds Number by Plasma Actuators , 2012 .

[12]  Thomas Corke,et al.  Plasma Actuators for Separation Control of Low-Pressure Turbine Blades , 2006 .

[13]  Miguel R. Visbal,et al.  Numerical Investigation of Plasma-Based Flow Control for Transitional Highly-Loaded Low-Pressure Turbine , 2007 .

[14]  Antonio Ficarella,et al.  Plasma actuator scaling down to improve its energy conversion efficiency for active flow control in modern turbojet engines compressors , 2016 .

[15]  T. Matsunuma,et al.  LDV Measurements of Unsteady Flow in a Turbine Rotor , 2002 .

[16]  Jamey Jacob,et al.  Numerical Simulations of Plasma Based Flow Control Applications , 2005 .

[17]  R. E. Mayle,et al.  The 1991 IGTI Scholar Lecture: The Role of Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Gas Turbine Engines , 1991 .

[18]  D. S. Martínez,et al.  Optimization of micro single dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator models based on experimental velocity and body force fields , 2015 .

[19]  A. Ficarella,et al.  Effect of a micro dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator on quiescent flow , 2014 .

[20]  A. Ficarella,et al.  Investigations of the actuation effect of a single DBD plasma actuator for flow separation control under simulated low pressure turbine blade conditions , 2016 .

[21]  Taku Nonomura,et al.  Mechanisms for laminar separated-flow control using dielectric-barrier-discharge plasma actuator at low Reynolds number , 2015 .

[22]  Y. B. Suzen,et al.  Numerical Simulations of Flow Separation Control in Low- Pressure Turbines using Plasma Actuators , 2007 .

[23]  Mohamed Gad-el-Hak,et al.  Flow Control: Passive, Active, and Reactive Flow Management , 2000 .

[24]  E. Moreau,et al.  Time-dependent volume force produced by a non-thermal plasma actuator from experimental velocity field , 2013 .

[25]  Maria Grazia De Giorgi,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Analysis of a Micro Plasma Actuator for Active Flow Control in Turbomachinery , 2014 .

[26]  J. Bons,et al.  Parametric Optimization of Unsteady End Wall Blowing on a Highly Loaded Low-Pressure Turbine , 2014 .

[27]  Maria Grazia De Giorgi,et al.  Micro DBD plasma actuators for flow separation control on a low pressure turbine at high altitude flight operating conditions of aircraft engines , 2017 .

[28]  A. Ficarella,et al.  Investigation of a Micro Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuator for Regional Aircraft Active Flow Control , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[29]  Eric Moreau,et al.  Unsteady aspect of the electrohydrodynamic force produced by surface dielectric barrier discharge actuators , 2012 .

[30]  C. Tropea,et al.  Airflow influence on the discharge performance of dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators , 2012 .

[31]  H. Abe,et al.  LDV Measurements of Unsteady Flow within a Turbine Rotor at Low Reynolds Numbers , 2002 .

[32]  A. Ficarella,et al.  Investigation of the boundary layer characteristics for assessing the DBD plasma actuator control of the separated flow at low Reynolds numbers , 2017 .

[33]  José C. Páscoa,et al.  Modified split-potential model for modeling the effect of DBD plasma actuators in high altitude flow control , 2014 .

[34]  Jürgen Kompenhans,et al.  Particle image velocimetry: a practical guide (experimental fluid mechanics) , 2017 .

[35]  Weeratunge Malalasekera,et al.  An introduction to computational fluid dynamics - the finite volume method , 2007 .

[36]  T. Matsunuma,et al.  Effects of Low Reynolds Number on Wake-Generated Unsteady Flow of an Axial-Flow Turbine Rotor , 2005 .