The Accessibility Impact of a New High-Speed Rail Line in the UK - A Preliminary Analysis of Winners and Losers

This paper analyses changes in accessibility that might result from a new High-Speed Rail (HSR) line in the UK. A proposal for such a line put forward by Network Rail in 2009 is used as the basis for the analysis. Using travel time to London as the main benchmark to measure accessibility of a station on the current (conventional) and future (high-speed) rail networks the paper examines the likely winners and losers from the construction of the new line. The results show that the accessibility benefits from the proposed line are relatively limited in terms of geographic spread and that many cities close to it would not see any travel time reductions on journeys to London, thus will not see any accessibility benefits in this respect. For such places, this will translate to a relative reduction in the accessibility to London, when compared to other locations, and thus to potentially adverse socioeconomic implications. The paper concludes by arguing that any examination of a HSR line must consider a wider geographic area than just the cities, and especially the stations, on the line and it therefore must give due consideration to integration between transport networks, and especially between the high-speed and conventional rail networks. Based on the current analysis, the paper concludes that the case for a HSR line in the UK from a regional accessibility perspective is questionable.

[1]  Christian Brand,et al.  Are railways 'climate friendly?' , 2009 .

[2]  Ginés de Rus,et al.  The Economic Effects of High Speed Rail Investment , 2008 .

[3]  Pablo Coto-Millán,et al.  Effects of network economies in high-speed rail: the Spanish case , 2007 .

[4]  B. Wee,et al.  Accessibility measures with competition , 2001 .

[5]  Chia-Lin Chen,et al.  The impacts of high-speed trains on British economic geography: a study of the UK’s InterCity 125/225 and its effects , 2011 .

[6]  Bert van Wee,et al.  Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions , 2004 .

[7]  Vicente Inglada,et al.  Cost-benefit analysis of the high-speed train in Spain , 1997 .

[8]  Juan Carlos Martín,et al.  Microeconomic impacts of investments in high speed trains in Spain , 2007 .

[9]  Moshe Givoni,et al.  Development and Impact of the Modern High‐speed Train: A Review , 2006 .

[10]  Michael Wegener,et al.  The Shrinking Continent: New Time—Space Maps of Europe , 1994 .

[11]  Ana Rivas,et al.  THE SUSTAINABLE CITY II. URBAN REGENERATION AND SUSTAINABILITY. NEW HIGH-SPEED RAIL LINES AND SMALL CITIES: LOCATING THE STATION , 2002 .

[12]  R. Eddington.  The Eddington transport study: the case for action: Sir Rod Eddington's advice to Government , 2006 .

[13]  J. Gutiérrez.  Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: an analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid–Barcelona–French border , 2001 .

[14]  M. Wardman.  A REVIEW OF BRITISH EVIDENCE ON TIME AND SERVICE QUALITY VALUATIONS , 2001 .

[15]  Héctor Samuel Martínez Sánchez-Mateos.  La estructura del transporte y sus implicaciones territoriales en Castilla- La Mancha , 2010 .

[16]  David Banister,et al.  Transport Investment and Economic Development , 2000 .

[17]  David Banister,et al.  Speed: the less important element of the High-Speed Train , 2012 .

[18]  Maddi Garmendia,et al.  The high-speed rail challenge for big intermediate cities: A national, regional and local perspective , 2009 .

[19]  Moshe Givoni,et al.  The Environmental Case for the High-Speed Train in the UK: Examining the London–Manchester Route , 2013 .