Wind Energy Facility Siting: Learning from Experience and Guides for Moving Forward

Renewable energy technologies, like wind turbines, solar arrays, and biomass (and biogas) plants, and carbon reduction technologies, such as carbon storage and sequestration (CSS), will be a critical part of future energy supplies as the United States and other countries seek ways to reduce carbon emissions. Renewable energy technologies can be perceived as hazardous and undesirable, much to the surprise of some. Siting failures can be high and unexpected. Broad, general support for renewable energy can give way to more polarization about specific proposals. While a growing literature exists about the formation of public support and opposition to wind and other renewable energy technologies, lessons relevant to the wind industry can be found from past experiences relating to hazardous technologies, including chemical processing plants, nuclear waste facilities, nuclear power plants, incinerators, and hazardous and municipal landfills, and locally unwanted land uses, such as airports, transmission lines, schools, and housing developments. There has been little direct application of this broad source of knowledge to wind or other renewable energy siting literature. We review this literature to identify factors that contribute to public support and opposition. Substantial increases in the contribution of wind energy to the US energy mix will require leadership at both the federal and state levels. We end by proposing several strategies for improving future wind energy siting efforts.

[1]  Al Anneloes Meijnders,et al.  Social acceptance of carbon dioxide storage , 2007 .

[2]  Holger Schütz,et al.  The Impacts of Precautionary Measures and the Disclosure of Scientific Uncertainty on EMF Risk Perception and Trust , 2006 .

[3]  Peter Cappers,et al.  The Impact of Wind Power Projects on Residential Property Values in the United States: A Multi-Site Hedonic Analysis , 2010 .

[4]  Brian F. Snyder,et al.  Ecological and economic cost-benefit analysis of offshore wind energy , 2009 .

[5]  Gabrielle Wong-Parodi,et al.  The Role of Social Factors in Shaping Public Perceptions of CCS: Results of Multi-State Focus Group Interviews in the U.S. , 2009 .

[6]  Wallace P. Erickson,et al.  Patterns of Bat Fatalities at Wind Energy Facilities in North America , 2008 .

[7]  B. Nordenstam The Influence of Environmental Uncertainty on Lay Perceptions of Risk and Safety , 1996 .

[8]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The affect heuristic , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Claire Haggett,et al.  Understanding public responses to offshore wind power , 2011 .

[10]  A. D. Risi,et al.  The potential compatibility of offshore wind power and fisheries: An example using bluefin tuna in the Adriatic Sea , 2007 .

[11]  O. Ibitayo,et al.  Public-private partnerships in the siting of hazardous waste facilities: the importance of trust , 2002, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[12]  P. Devine‐Wright Local aspects of UK renewable energy development: exploring public beliefs and policy implications , 2005 .

[13]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Stigma Happens: Social Problems in the Siting of Nuclear Waste Facilities , 1994 .

[14]  Petra Schweizer-Ries,et al.  Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany , 2008 .

[15]  S. Farber Undesirable facilities and property values: a summary of empirical studies , 1998 .

[16]  C. Gross,et al.  Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance , 2007 .

[17]  Barry D. Solomon,et al.  Wind Power in View: Energy Landscapes in a Crowded World , 2003 .

[18]  B. Frey,et al.  Fair siting procedures: An empirical analysis of their importance and characteristics , 1996 .

[19]  F. Leistritz,et al.  Support for Waste Facility Siting: Differences between Community Leaders and Residents , 2010 .

[20]  Gareth Harrison,et al.  Change in public attitudes towards a Cornish wind farm: Implications for planning , 2008 .

[21]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  The Role of Compensation in Siting Hazardous Facilities , 1996 .

[22]  R. Kasperson,et al.  The Public Acceptance of New Energy Technologies , 2013, Daedalus.

[23]  W. Musial,et al.  Large-Scale Offshore Wind Power in the United States: Executive Summary , 2010 .

[24]  Susan Hunter,et al.  Beyond NIMBY. Explaining Opposition to Hazardous Waste Facilities , 1995 .

[25]  Seth Tuler,et al.  How Preferences for Public Participation are Linked to Perceptions of the Context, Preferences for Outcomes, and Individual Characteristics , 2010, Environmental management.

[26]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support , 2000 .

[27]  G. Ellis,et al.  Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’: Applying Q-Methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals , 2007 .

[28]  Daniel Metlay,et al.  Institutional Trust and Confidence: A Journey into a Conceptual Quagmire , 2013 .

[29]  D. Kahan,et al.  Cultural cognition of scientific consensus , 2011 .

[30]  M. Kraft,et al.  Citizen Participation and the Nimby Syndrome: Public Response to Radioactive Waste Disposal , 1991 .

[31]  David Toke,et al.  The UK offshore wind power programme: A sea-change in UK energy policy? , 2011 .

[32]  Michael Greenberg,et al.  Energy sources, public policy, and public preferences: Analysis of US national and site-specific data , 2009 .

[33]  Wouter Poortinga,et al.  Exploring the Dimensionality of Trust in Risk Regulation , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[34]  Bishnu Raj Upreti,et al.  Conflict over biomass energy development in the United Kingdom: some observations and lessons from England and Wales , 2004 .

[35]  J. Eiser,et al.  Marginal Trust in Risk Managers: Building and Losing Trust Following Decisions Under Uncertainty , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[36]  V. Featherstone,et al.  A RAPID REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE , 2014 .

[37]  Bonnie Ram,et al.  Assessing Integrated Risks of Offshore Wind Projects: Moving towards Gigawatt-Scale Deployments , 2011 .

[38]  Richard B. Philp,et al.  Wind Turbines and Health , 2011 .

[39]  L. Hamilton,et al.  Economic Insights into the Siting Problem: An Application of the Expected Utility Model , 1999, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[40]  Janet Stephenson,et al.  Public perceptions of wind energy developments: Case studies from New Zealand , 2009 .

[41]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Explaining “NIMBY” Objections to a Power Line , 2013 .

[42]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’ , 2007 .

[43]  K. Bos Fairness heuristic theory : Assessing the information to which people are reacting has a pivotal role in understanding organizational justice , 2001 .

[44]  Rae Zimmerman,et al.  Social Trust and the Management of Risk , 2006 .

[45]  Ralph Chapman,et al.  Distributed Small-Scale Wind in New Zealand: Advantages, Barriers and Policy Support Instruments , 2009 .

[46]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study , 2010 .

[47]  Joyce McLaren Loring,et al.  Wind energy planning in England, Wales and Denmark: Factors influencing project success , 2007 .

[48]  P. Sinclair,et al.  The influence of trust in a biomass plant application: the case study of Sutton, UK , 2001 .

[49]  Walter Musial,et al.  Book Review: Offshore Wind Power , 2010 .

[50]  Edmundo Claro Exchange Relationships and the Environment: The Acceptability of Compensation in the Siting of Waste Disposal Facilities , 2007, Environmental Values.

[51]  Jacob Ladenburg,et al.  PREFERENCES OF COASTAL ZONE USER GROUPS REGARDING THE SITING OF OFFSHORE WIND FARMS , 2009 .

[52]  R. Löfstedt Siting conflicts in renewable energy projects : A biogas case study , 2004 .

[53]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Procedural Justice, Participation, and the Fair Process Effect in Groups and Organizations , 1983 .

[54]  B. Rabe,et al.  Alternatives to NIMBY gridlock: voluntary approaches to radioactive waste facility siting in Canada and the United States , 1994 .

[55]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Nuclear Waste: Knowledge Waste? , 2010, Science.

[56]  Frede Hvelplund,et al.  Stability, participation and transparency in renewable energy policy: Lessons from Denmark and the United States , 2009, Renewable Energy.

[57]  W. Kempton,et al.  Public opinion about large offshore wind power: Underlying factors , 2007 .

[58]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks , 1992 .

[59]  Ben Hoen,et al.  A Spatial Hedonic Analysis of the Effects of Wind Energy Facilities on Surrounding Property Values in the United States , 2014 .

[60]  Charles R. Warren,et al.  ‘Green On Green’: Public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland , 2005 .

[61]  Søren Krohn,et al.  On public attitudes towards wind power , 1999 .

[62]  A. Jobert,et al.  Local acceptance of wind energy: Factors of success identified in French and German case studies , 2007 .

[63]  Susan Miles,et al.  Public preferences for informed choice under conditions of risk uncertainty , 2002 .

[64]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .

[65]  D. Horst NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies , 2007 .

[66]  Gillian Irene Bristow,et al.  Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy development , 2011 .