Negative congruence effects in letter and pseudo-letter recognition: the role of similarity and response conflict

Letters and pseudo-letters were presented in three experiments using a sequential same-different task. While first items were always presented in isolation, the second item was either presented in isolation or surrounded by geometrical non-target shapes that could be congruent or incongruent to the target. In two experiments, a physical sameness criterion was used. In Experiment 1, in one condition, different pairs were always distinct in shape, in another they were similar in shape. Negative congruence effects were obtained for different pairs that are similar. In Experiment 2, this effect is replicated within participants. In this experiment, similar and dissimilar stimuli were mixed. The results were explained in terms of the difficulty of responding different to stimuli that are similar in shape: when the second item is surrounded by a congruent shape, the similarity is emphasized, making this response even more difficult. In Experiment 3, the same stimuli were presented using a categorical sameness criterion. This reduces the role of physical similarity and thus eliminates the response conflict. As a result, negative congruence effects were no longer observed. Taken together, the three experiments identify another source of negative congruence effects besides the ones recently reported in the literature.

[1]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  Letter legibility and visual word recognition , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[2]  W. Estes,et al.  Similarity-related channel interactions in visual processing. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  A unified theory for matching-task phenomena. , 1981 .

[4]  J G Rueckl,et al.  On the locus of redundancy effects in a letter-detection task , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Christine Deruelle,et al.  Positive and negative compatibility effects , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  D. Sagi,et al.  Top-Down Modulation of Lateral Interactions in Early Vision Does Attention Affect Integration of the Whole or Just Perception of the Parts? , 2003, Current Biology.

[7]  A F Sanders,et al.  The Eriksen flanker effect revisited. , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[8]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  Spatial-frequency and contrast properties of crowding , 2001, Vision Research.

[9]  A. van der Heijden,et al.  Target-noise separation in visual selective attention. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[10]  Gideon Keren,et al.  Levels of noise processing and attentional control. , 1977 .

[11]  Jeff F. Miller The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: A search for boundary conditions , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[13]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[14]  Thomas Lachmann,et al.  Negative and positive congruence effects in letters and shapes , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  L E Krueger,et al.  Effect of irrelevant surrounding material on speed of same-different judgment of two adjacent letters. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  Lester E. Kreuger Effect of irrelevant surrounding material on speed of same-different judgment of two adjacent letters. , 1973 .

[17]  T. Lachmann,et al.  Task-Invariant Aspects of Goodness in Perceptual Representation , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[18]  Selective attention to global and local structure of objects: Alternative measures of nontarget processing , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  Thomas Lachmann,et al.  Memory search instead of template matching? Representation-guided inference in same-different performance. , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[20]  William K. Estes,et al.  Interactions of signal and background variables in visual processing , 1972 .

[21]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  D. Levi,et al.  The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea , 1992, Vision Research.

[23]  T. Lachmann Strategies of coding and processing in a physical same-different-task1 , 2001 .

[24]  T. Lachmann,et al.  Memory-Guided Inference in Same – Different Comparison Tasks , 2022 .

[25]  C. Leeuwen,et al.  Stroop can occur without Garner interference: Strategic and mandatory influences in multidimensional stimuli , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Howard E. Egeth,et al.  Conceptual and perceptual components of interletter inhibition. , 1981 .

[27]  Elizabeth L Bjork,et al.  On the nature of input channels in visual processing. , 1977, Psychological review.

[28]  M. Posner Chronometric explorations of mind : the third Paul M. Fitts lectures, delivered at the University of Michigan, September 1976 , 1978 .

[29]  C. Leeuwen,et al.  Individual pattern representations are context independent, but their collectiverepresentation is context dependent , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[30]  R. Nickerson ‘Same’-‘different’ response times: A model and a preliminary test , 1969 .

[31]  S J Leat,et al.  Crowding in central and eccentric vision: the effects of contour interaction and attention. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[32]  N. Lavie Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  James R. Pomerantz,et al.  Attention and object perception. , 1989 .