Fundamentals of fish ecological integrity and their relation to the extended serial discontinuity concept

Current ecological theories and concepts describe running waters as four-dimensional systems, their longitudinal, lateral and vertical linkages, interactions and exchange processes varying over time and over different scales. According to Ward & Stanford’s (1983) extended serial discontinuity concept (ESDC), along a three-reach river, model the relative strength of the longitudinal pathways is highest in the constrained headwaters, vertical interactions reach their maximum in the braided middle course and lateral connectivity plays the major role in alluvial floodplain rivers. The present paper examines the general tenets of the ESDC from a fundamental fish ecology perspective. Specifically, it focuses on the degree to which the spatial/temporal connectivity requirements of fish communities or key fish species along a schematic longitudinal river course are compatible with the underlying principles of the ESDC and whether these requirements provide basic criteria for assessing the ecological integrity of running waters. From the fish ecological perspective, the examples provided here demonstrate a principle agreement with the concept of the four-dimensional nature of running waters, whose key functional and structural elements are spatial/temporal fluvial dynamics, disturbances, connectivity, succession and ecotones. Fish are particularly useful indicators of the temporally variable connectivities on the full range of scales at the three spatial dimensions. As far as the habitat requirements of typical species/developmental stages are concerned, two major modifications of the ESDC are needed. In constrained headwaters, in addition to longitudinal connectivity, the crucial importance of the vertical pathway river/bed sediments for reproduction must be emphasized. Also, in addition to lateral connectivity, longitudinal connectivity remains a vital basis for potamal fish communities in alluvial braided and meandering zones.

[1]  A. Peter.  Interruption of the River Continuum by Barriers and the Consequences for Migratory Fish , 1998 .

[2]  J. Sedell,et al.  Development and Evaluation of Aquatic Conservation Strategies , 1994 .

[3]  P. J. Boon.  The development of integrated methods for assessing river conservation value , 2000 .

[4]  J. Stanford,et al.  Management of Aquatic Resources in Large Catchments: Recognizing Interactions Between Ecosystem Connectivity and Environmental Disturbance , 1992 .

[5]  W. Junk.  The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems , 1989 .

[6]  T. Northcote,et al.  Migratory Behaviour of Fish and its Significance to Movement through Riverine Fish Passage Facilities , 1998 .

[7]  Susanne Muhar,et al.  Assessing rivers with high and good habitat integrity in the Alpine region as a foundation for conservation programmes: applications in Austria , 2000 .

[8]  Effects of residual flow and habitat fragmentation on distribution and movement of bullhead (Cottus gobio L.) in an alpine stream , 2000 .

[9]  R. Naiman,et al.  The ecology and management of aquatic-terrestrial ecotones. , 1990 .

[10]  C. Nilsson,et al.  Fragmentation and Flow Regulation of River Systems in the Northern Third of the World , 1994, Science.

[11]  Klement Tockner,et al.  Biodiversity of floodplain river ecosystems: ecotones and connectivity1 , 1999 .

[12]  Identification of rivers with high and good habitat quality: methodological approach and applications in Austria , 2000 .

[13]  J. Stanford,et al.  The serial discontinuity concept of lotic ecosystems , 1983 .

[14]  P. Gaudin,et al.  Habitat selection by grayling. II: Preliminary results on larval and juvenile daytime habitats , 1995 .

[15]  R. Kinzelbach.  Biologie der Donau , 1994 .

[16]  J. Ward,et al.  The Four-Dimensional Nature of Lotic Ecosystems , 1989, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[17]  P. Gaudin,et al.  Habitat selection by grayling—I. Spawning habitats , 1995 .

[18]  F. H. Dawson,et al.  Quality assessment using River Habitat Survey data , 1998 .

[19]  J. Stanford,et al.  Ecological connectivity in alluvial river ecosystems and its disruption by flow regulation , 1995 .

[20]  Klement Tockner,et al.  Ecological Aspects of the Restoration Strategy for a River-Floodplain System on the Danube River in Austria , 1997 .

[21]  H. Wintersberger,et al.  Fish fry associations: Important indicators for the ecological status of large rivers , 1991 .

[22]  S. Schmutz,et al.  Fish Migration and Fish Bypasses , 1998 .

[23]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[24]  Klement Tockner,et al.  Conservation by restoration: the management concept for a river-floodplain system on the Danube River in Austria , 1998 .

[25]  Klement Tockner,et al.  The Danube restoration project: species diversity patterns across connectivity gradients in the floodplain system , 1999 .

[26]  G. Petts.  Perspectives for Ecological Management of Regulated Rivers , 1989 .

[27]  Susanne Muhar,et al.  HABITAT IMPROVEMENT OF AUSTRIAN RIVERS WITH REGARD TO DIFFERENT SCALES , 1996 .

[28]  Arthur C. Benke,et al.  A Perspective on America's Vanishing Streams , 1990, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[29]  James R. Karr,et al.  Ecological perspective on water quality goals , 1981 .

[30]  M. Jungwirth.  River Continuum and Fish Migration - Going Beyond the Longitudinal River Corridor in Understanding Ecological Integrity , 1998 .

[31]  P. Gaudin,et al.  Size-related changes in diel distribution of young grayling (Thymallus thymallus) , 1995 .

[32]  F. Schiemer.  Fish as indicators for the assessment of the ecological integrity of large rivers , 2000 .

[33]  H. Waidbacher,et al.  Fish Migration and Fish Passage Facilities in the Danube: Past and Present , 1998 .

[34]  J. Stanford,et al.  The serial discontinuity concept : extending the model to floodplain rivers , 1995 .