Image processing techniques for noise removal, enhancement and segmentation of cartilage OCT images.

Osteoarthritis, whose hallmark is the progressive loss of joint cartilage, is a major cause of morbidity worldwide. Recently, optical coherence tomography (OCT) has demonstrated considerable promise for the assessment of articular cartilage. Among the most important parameters to be assessed is cartilage width. However, detection of the bone cartilage interface is critical for the assessment of cartilage width. At present, the quantitative evaluations of cartilage thickness are being done using manual tracing of cartilage-bone borders. Since data is being obtained near video rate with OCT, automated identification of the bone-cartilage interface is critical. In order to automate the process of boundary detection on OCT images, there is a need for developing new image processing techniques. In this paper we describe the image processing techniques for speckle removal, image enhancement and segmentation of cartilage OCT images. In particular, this paper focuses on rabbit cartilage since this is an important animal model for testing both chondroprotective agents and cartilage repair techniques. In this study, a variety of techniques were examined. Ultimately, by combining an adaptive filtering technique with edge detection (vertical gradient, Sobel edge detection), cartilage edges can be detected. The procedure requires several steps and can be automated. Once the cartilage edges are outlined, the cartilage thickness can be measured.

[1]  James G. Fujimoto,et al.  High resolution in vivo imaging of osteoarthritic cartilage , 2002 .

[2]  J. Schmitt,et al.  Phase-domain processing of optical coherence tomography images. , 1999, Journal of biomedical optics.

[3]  E A Swanson,et al.  Quantification of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. , 1995, Archives of ophthalmology.

[4]  R. Malamet,et al.  A survey of osteoarthritis of the knee in the elderly. , 1983, The Journal of rheumatology.

[5]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  In vivo endoscopic optical biopsy with optical coherence tomography. , 1997, Science.

[6]  S. Santavirta,et al.  Periosteal and perichondral grafting in reconstructive surgery. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  J M Schmitt,et al.  Restoration of Optical Coherence Images of Living Tissue Using the CLEAN Algorithm. , 1998, Journal of biomedical optics.

[8]  C G Peterfy,et al.  Scratching the surface: articular cartilage disorders in the knee. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[9]  J. G. Fujimoto,et al.  Assessing atherosclerotic plaque morphology: comparison of optical coherence tomography and high frequency intravascular ultrasound. , 1997, Heart.

[10]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical coherence tomography for optical biopsy. Properties and demonstration of vascular pathology. , 1996, Circulation.

[11]  Serge Beucher,et al.  Segmentation tools in mathematical morphology , 1990, Optics & Photonics.

[12]  B E Bouma,et al.  High resolution imaging of normal and osteoarthritic cartilage with optical coherence tomography. , 1999, The Journal of rheumatology.

[13]  Mark E. Brezinski,et al.  Evaluation of the adaptive speckle suppression filter for coronary optical coherence tomography imaging , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Assessment of coronary plaque with optical coherence tomography and high-frequency ultrasound. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  Kim L. Boyer,et al.  Retinal thickness measurements from optical coherence tomography using a Markov boundary model , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  R. Altman,et al.  Chondroprotection in osteoarthritis. , 1997, Bulletin of rheumatic diseases.

[17]  Douglas L. Jones,et al.  Detection of lines and boundaries in speckle images-application to medical ultrasound , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  J G Fujimoto,et al.  Correlation of collagen organization with polarization sensitive imaging of in vitro cartilage: implications for osteoarthritis. , 2001, The Journal of rheumatology.

[19]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical Coherence Tomography , 1991 .

[20]  Kyung-Bok Kim,et al.  Beam‐propagation analysis of tapered nonlinear directional couplers , 1997 .

[21]  W T Rhodes,et al.  Nonlinear image processing by a rotating kernel transformation. , 1990, Optics letters.

[22]  Joseph M. Schmitt,et al.  Speckle noise reduction for optical coherence tomography , 1998, European Conference on Biomedical Optics.

[23]  V Rejholec,et al.  Long-term studies of antiosteoarthritic drugs: an assessment. , 1987, Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.

[24]  J. Schmitt,et al.  Speckle in optical coherence tomography. , 1999, Journal of biomedical optics.