Classification of ultrasonic B-mode images of breast masses using Nakagami distribution

The Nakagami distribution was proposed recently for modeling the echo from tissue. In vivo breast data collected from patients with lesions were studied using this Nakagami model. Chi-square tests showed that the Nakagami distribution is a better fit to the envelope than the Rayleigh distribution. Two parameters, m (effective number) and /spl alpha/ (effective cross section), associated with the Nakagami distribution were used for the classification of breast masses. Data from 52 patients with breast masses/lesions were used in the studies. Receiver operating characteristics were calculated for the classification methods based on these two parameters. The results indicate that these parameters of the Nakagami distribution may be useful in classification of the breast abnormalities. The Nakagami distribution may be a reasonable means to characterize the backscattered echo from breast tissues toward a goal of an automated scheme for separating benign and malignant breast masses.

[1]  M. Nakagami.  The m-Distribution—A General Formula of Intensity Distribution of Rapid Fading , 1960 .

[2]  F. Dunn,et al.  Comprehensive compilation of empirical ultrasonic properties of mammalian tissues. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Bruno O. Shubert,et al.  Random variables and stochastic processes , 1979 .

[4]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[5]  A. P. Harper,et al.  Ultrasound in the evaluation of solid breast masses. , 1983, Radiology.

[6]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Statistics of Speckle in Ultrasound B-Scans , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[7]  E A Sickles,et al.  Benign breast lesions: ultrasound detection and diagnosis. , 1984, Radiology.

[8]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Probability, random variables and stochastic processes , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[9]  G. Leopold,et al.  Real-time breast sonography: application in 300 consecutive patients. , 1986, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  C. Metz.  ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[11]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Statistical properties of radio-frequency and envelope-detected signals with applications to medical ultrasound. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[12]  J. Swets,et al.  Enhanced interpretation of diagnostic images. , 1988, Investigative radiology.

[13]  K. Parker,et al.  Deviations from Rayleigh Statistics in Ultrasonic Speckle , 1988, Ultrasonic imaging.

[14]  C E Metz,et al.  Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[15]  Henry Chan,et al.  Radar sea-clutter at low grazing angles , 1990 .

[16]  B. Garra,et al.  Improving the Distinction between Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions: The Value of Sonographic Texture Analysis , 1993 .

[17]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  Non-Rayleigh first-order statistics of ultrasonic backscatter from normal myocardium. , 1993, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  J. Greenleaf,et al.  Ultrasound echo envelope analysis using a homodyned K distribution signal model. , 1994, Ultrasonic imaging.

[19]  P.M. Shankar,et al.  Non-Rayleigh statistics of ultrasonic backscattered signals , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[20]  P M Shankar,et al.  A model for ultrasonic scattering from tissues based on the K distribution. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  A. Stavros,et al.  Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. , 1995, Radiology.

[22]  P. Shankar,et al.  Characterization of ultrasonic B-scans using non-Rayleigh statistics. , 1995, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[23]  P M Shankar,et al.  Studies on the use of non-Rayleigh statistics for ultrasonic tissue characterization. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[24]  Athina P. Petropulu,et al.  On modeling the tissue response from ultrasonic B-scan images , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[25]  F.S. Cohen,et al.  WOLD decomposition of the backscatter echo in ultrasound images of soft tissue organs , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[26]  L. C. Gilman,et al.  First-order statistics of pulsed-sinusoid backscatter from random media: basic elements of an exact treatment , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[27]  F. Forsberg,et al.  Analysis and classification of tissue with scatterer structure templates , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[28]  P. Shankar.  A general statistical model for ultrasonic backscattering from tissues , 2000 .