Effect of PET-MR Inconsistency in the Kernel Image Reconstruction Method

Anatomically driven image reconstruction algorithms have become very popular in positron emission tomography (PET) where they have demonstrated improved image resolution and quantification. This paper examines the effects of spatial inconsistency between MR and PET images in hot and cold regions of PET images using the hybrid kernelized expectation maximization (HKEM) machine learning method. Our evaluation was conducted on Jaszczak phantom and patient data acquired with the Biograph Siemens mMR. The results show that even a small shift can cause a significant change in activity concentration. In general, the PET-MR inconsistencies can induce the partial volume effect, more specifically the “spill-in” for cold regions and the “spill-out” for hot regions. The maximum change was about 100% for the cold region and 10% for the hot lesion using kernelized expectation maximization, against the 37% and 8% obtained with HKEM. The findings of this paper suggest that including PET information in the kernel enhances the robustness of the reconstruction in case of spatial inconsistency. Nevertheless, accurate registration and choice of the appropriate MR image for the creation of the kernel is essential to avoid artifacts, blurring, and bias.

[1]  Nicolas A Karakatsanis,et al.  Hybrid PET/MR Kernelised Expectation Maximisation Reconstruction for Improved Image-Derived Estimation of the Input Function from the Aorta of Rabbits , 2019, Contrast media & molecular imaging.

[2]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Anatomy-based reconstruction of FDG-PET images with implicit partial volume correction improves detection of hypometabolic regions in patients with epilepsy due to focal cortical dysplasia diagnosed on MRI , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[3]  Quanzheng Li,et al.  Iterative PET Image Reconstruction Using Convolutional Neural Network Representation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Alex Smola,et al.  Kernel methods in machine learning , 2007, math/0701907.

[5]  David Atkinson,et al.  Joint reconstruction of PET-MRI by exploiting structural similarity , 2014, Inverse Problems.

[6]  Anthonin Reilhac,et al.  Evaluation of Three MRI-Based Anatomical Priors for Quantitative PET Brain Imaging , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Guobao Wang,et al.  Direct Patlak Reconstruction From Dynamic PET Data Using the Kernel Method With MRI Information Based on Structural Similarity , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Guobao Wang,et al.  Anatomical-image aided PET reconstruction by the kernel method , 2014 .

[9]  Simon R. Arridge,et al.  PET Image Reconstruction Using Information Theoretic Anatomical Priors , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Guobao Wang,et al.  PET Image Reconstruction Using Kernel Method , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Leslie Ying,et al.  Artificial Neural Network Enhanced Bayesian PET Image Reconstruction , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Guobao Wang,et al.  Anatomically-aided PET reconstruction using the kernel method , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Kris Thielemans,et al.  STIR: Software for Tomographic Image Reconstruction Release 2 , 2006 .

[14]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Evaluation of anatomy based reconstruction for partial volume correction in brain FDG-PET , 2004, NeuroImage.

[15]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Image Reconstruction is a New Frontier of Machine Learning , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Kernelised EM image reconstruction for dual-dataset PET studies , 2016, 2016 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Medical Imaging Conference and Room-Temperature Semiconductor Detector Workshop (NSS/MIC/RTSD).

[17]  Pawel Markiewicz,et al.  PET Reconstruction With an Anatomical MRI Prior Using Parallel Level Sets , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Jong Hoon Kim,et al.  Penalized PET Reconstruction Using Deep Learning Prior and Local Linear Fitting , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Jieqing Jiao,et al.  Detail-Preserving PET Reconstruction with Sparse Image Representation and Anatomical Priors , 2015, IPMI.

[20]  Arman Rahmim,et al.  Bayesian PET image reconstruction incorporating anato-functional joint entropy , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[21]  Ronald J. Jaszczak,et al.  Bayesian reconstruction and use of anatomical a priori information for emission tomography , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[22]  Kris Thielemans,et al.  Optimizability of loglikelihoods for the estimation of detector efficiencies and singles rates in PET , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[23]  Fernando Boada,et al.  Evaluation of Parallel Level Sets and Bowsher’s Method as Segmentation-Free Anatomical Priors for Time-of-Flight PET Reconstruction , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  C. Tsoumpas,et al.  Evaluation of the single scatter simulation algorithm implemented in the STIR library , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[25]  Alexander Hammers,et al.  MR-Guided Kernel EM Reconstruction for Reduced Dose PET Imaging , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.

[26]  Robert G. Aykroyd,et al.  Hybrid PET-MR list-mode kernelized expectation maximization reconstruction for quantitative PET images of the carotid arteries , 2017, 2017 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[27]  Philip Novosad,et al.  MR-guided dynamic PET reconstruction with the kernel method and spectral temporal basis functions , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  Alexander Hammers,et al.  Spatially Compact MR-Guided Kernel EM for PET Image Reconstruction , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.

[29]  Walter Oberschelp,et al.  Expectation maximization reconstruction of positron emission tomography images using anatomical magnetic resonance information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  Alexander Hammers,et al.  PET image reconstruction using multi-parametric anato-functional priors , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  Kris Thielemans,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of normalisation factors for PET , 2001, 2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310).

[32]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Incorporation of Anatomical MR Data for Improved Dunctional Imaging with PET , 1991, IPMI.

[33]  Alexander Hammers,et al.  Synergistic PET and SENSE MR Image Reconstruction Using Joint Sparsity Regularization , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[34]  V. Fuster,et al.  MR-based attenuation correction in cardiovascular PET/MR imaging: challenges and practical solutions for cardiorespiratory motion and tissue class segmentation , 2016 .

[35]  Kristian Bredies,et al.  Joint MR-PET Reconstruction Using a Multi-Channel Image Regularizer , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[36]  Kris Thielemans,et al.  Comparative evaluation of scatter correction in 3D PET using different scatter-level approximations , 2011, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[37]  Guobao Wang,et al.  Statistical Image Reconstruction for Shortened Dynamic PET Using a Dual Kernel Method , 2017, 2017 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[38]  D Strul,et al.  Robustness of Anatomically Guided Pixel-by-Pixel Algorithms for Partial Volume Effect Correction in Positron Emission Tomography , 1999, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[39]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Comparison between MAP and postprocessed ML for image reconstruction in emission tomography when anatomical knowledge is available , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.