Chapter 1 – The assessment of vision

1. Preamble Standardized tests are monstrously unfair to many kids. We're creating a one-size-fits-all system that needlessly brands many young people as failures, when they might thrive if offered a different education whose progress was measured differently. ~Robert Reich Educational systems (in the U.S. and around the world) face huge challenges that require bold and creative solutions to prepare students for success in the 21st century. Part of the solution will require a new focus on students developing the ability to solve complex problems in innovative ways, as well as the ability to think clearly about systems. We need to identify ways to fully engage students through learning environments that meet their needs and interests. When coupled with online collaboration with other students (locally and distally), such environments have the potential to develop students' communication skills and creative abilities as they become exposed to diverse cultures and viewpoints. Assessment results can and should have important implications for instruction, positively influencing both the teaching and learning sides of the equation. Currently, assessments are too often used for purposes of grading, promotion, and placement, but not for learning. That needs to be fixed. The stance we take on assessment is that it should: (a) support, not undermine, the learning process for learners and teachers (as well as online agents); (b) provide more formative than summative information (i.e., give useful feedback during the learning process instead of a single judgment at the end); and (c) be responsive to what is known about how people learn, generally and developmentally. This attractive vision of assessment has its primary goal to improve learning (e. has suggested that assessment should be used for two reasons: to gather evidence to inform instructional decisions, and to encourage learners to try to learn. It is this vision of educational assessment that we find to be exciting, powerful, and absolutely critical to support the kinds of learning outcomes and processes necessary for students to succeed in the 21st century. This type of assessment is referred to as " formative assessment, " which may be thought of as assessment for learning, in contrast to " summative assessment " (or assessment of learning).

[1]  H. Pain,et al.  ' Did I say what I think I said , and do you agree with me ? ' : Inspecting and Questioning the Student Model , 1995 .

[2]  Vania Dimitrova,et al.  STyLE-OLM: Interactive Open Learner Modelling , 2003, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[3]  G. Wald THE RECEPTORS OF HUMAN COLOR VISION. , 1964, Science.

[4]  Jack Mostow,et al.  The Sounds of Silence: Towards Automated Evaluation of Student Learning in a Reading Tutor that Listens , 1997, AAAI/IAAI.

[5]  I L Bailey,et al.  New Design Principles for Visual Acuity Letter Charts* , 1976, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[6]  P. McGraw,et al.  Glasgow Acuity Cards: a new test for the measurement of letter acuity in children , 1993, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[7]  R. Glaser,et al.  Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment , 2001 .

[8]  R. Stiggins Assessment Crisis: The Absence of Assessment for Learning , 2002 .

[9]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Principles of Lifelong Learning for Predictive User Modeling , 2007, User Modeling.

[10]  Russell G. Almond,et al.  On the Structure of Educational Assessments, CSE Technical Report. , 2003 .

[11]  J Green,et al.  On a New Series of Test-Letters for determining the Acuteness of Vision. , 1868, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[12]  Joseph E. Beck,et al.  Using learning decomposition to analyze student fluency development , 2005 .

[13]  Antonija Mitrovic,et al.  Supporting Learning by Opening the Student Model , 2002, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[14]  Jim E. Greer,et al.  Inspectable Bayesian student modelling servers in multi-agent tutoring systems , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[15]  Judy Kay,et al.  Lifelong Learner Modeling for Lifelong Personalized Pervasive Learning , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[16]  V. Shute,et al.  Melding the Power of Serious Games and Embedded Assessment to Monitor and Foster Learning: Flow and Grow , 2009 .

[17]  Paul Brna,et al.  Negotiated Collaborative Assessment through Collaborative Student Modelling , 1999 .

[18]  Joseph E. Beck,et al.  Using Knowledge Tracing in a Noisy Environment to Measure Student Reading Proficiencies , 2006, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[19]  Valerie J. Shute,et al.  TENSIONS, TRENDS, TOOLS, AND TECHNOLOGIES: TIME FOR AN EDUCATIONAL SEA CHANGE , 2006 .

[20]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Developing a generalizable detector of when students game the system , 2008, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.