Knowledge-directed learning

A system embodying a knowledge-directed approach to unsupervised learning is examined in this paper. This approach is based on the premise that knowledge of new situations is acquired and interpreted in terms of the previous knowledge brought to the learning situation. In particular, our system is provided with a general characterization of action-oriented competitive games. This frame of reference is used to construct an interpretation for the patterns of human activity that are observed in games of baseball.Multiple levels of knowledge and processing are used to proceed through various levels of description of the observed human behavior. Hypothesis Generation shifts the pattern description from observed physical actions such as "catch" and "run" to inferred goals and causal relationships of the players executing those actions. Hypothesis Generalization abstracts generalized classes of events and schemata that represent concepts such as "hit" and "out". Hypothesis Evaluation closes the loop in the learning process by verifying or rejecting the various hypotheses. Knowledge encoded as schemata direct these processes; there are schemata for inferring competitive and cooperative goals and causal relationships of players.An important aspect of the system is its ability to use acquired knowledge. The multi-level organization facilitates the integration of the new information into the existing knowledge structure. Also, both the initial knowledge and the acquired knowledge are represented uniformly as schemata (production rules). Acquired schemata, then, are available to assist in interpreting and predicting future events. This ability demonstrates the effectiveness of our knowledge-directed approach to learning.

[1]  Patrick Henry Winston,et al.  Learning structural descriptions from examples , 1970 .

[2]  Donald A. Waterman,et al.  Generalization Learning Techniques for Automating the Learning of Heuristics , 1970, Artif. Intell..

[3]  Joshua Lederberg,et al.  A Heuristic Programming Study of Theory Formation in Science , 1971, IJCAI.

[4]  B. Sutton-Smith,et al.  The Study of Games , 1971 .

[5]  Eugene Charniak,et al.  Toward a model of children's story comprehension , 1972 .

[6]  Gerald J. Sussman,et al.  A Computational Model of Skill Acquisition , 1973 .

[7]  Gary G. Hendrix,et al.  Modeling Simultaneous Actions and Continuous Processes , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[8]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[9]  Victor R. Lesser,et al.  A Multi-Level Organization For Problem Solving Using Many, Diverse, Cooperating Sources Of Knowledge , 1975, IJCAI.

[10]  R. Schank,et al.  Scripts, plans, and knowledge , 1975, IJCAI 1975.

[11]  Chuck Rieger,et al.  The Commonsense Algorithm as a Basis for Comfuter Models of Human Memory, Inference, Belief and Contextual Language Comprehension , 1975, TINLAP.

[12]  D. Rumelhart NOTES ON A SCHEMA FOR STORIES , 1975 .

[13]  Randall Davis,et al.  An overview of production systems , 1975 .

[14]  Douglas B. Lenat,et al.  AM, an artificial intelligence approach to discovery in mathematics as heuristic search , 1976 .

[15]  Allen R. Hanson,et al.  A Progress Report on VISIONS: Representation and Control in the Construction of Visual Models. , 1976 .

[16]  Ryszard S. Michalski,et al.  Learning by Inductive Inference , 1976 .

[17]  C. Schmidt Understanding human action: Recognizing the plans and motives of other persons. , 1976 .

[18]  Edward M. Riseman,et al.  Mechanizing the Common-Sense Inference of Rules which Direct Behaviour , 1976, AISB.

[19]  Steven A. Vere,et al.  Inductive learning of relational productions , 1977, SGAR.

[20]  Victor R. Lesser,et al.  A Retrospective View of the Hearsay-II Architecture , 1977, IJCAI.

[21]  Frederick Hayes-Roth,et al.  Knowledge acquisition from structural descriptions , 1977, IJCAI 1977.