Microsystems in health care: Part 4. Planning patient-centered care.

BACKGROUND Clinical microsystems are the essential building blocks of all health systems. At the heart of an effective microsystem is a productive interaction between an informed, activated patient and a prepared, proactive practice staff. Support, which increases the patient's ability for self-management, is an essential result of a productive interaction. This series on high-performing clinical microsystems is based on interviews and site visits to 20 clinical microsystems in the United States. This fourth article in the series describes how high-performing microsystems design and plan patient-centered care. PLANNING PATIENT-CENTERED CARE: Well-planned, patient-centered care results in improved practice efficiency and better patient outcomes. However, planning this care is not an easy task. Excellent planned care requires that the microsystem have services that match what really matters to a patient and family and protected time to reflect and plan. Patient self-management support, clinical decision support, delivery system design, and clinical information systems must be planned to be effective, timely, and efficient for each individual patient and for all patients. CONCLUSION Excellent planned services and planned care are attainable today in microsystems that understand what really matters to a patient and family and have the capacity to provide services to meet the patient's needs.

[1]  John H Wasson,et al.  Microsystems in health care: Part 2. Creating a rich information environment. , 2003, Joint Commission journal on quality and safety.

[2]  E. Nelson,et al.  Functional health status levels of primary care patients. , 1983, JAMA.

[3]  Thomas Bodenheimer,et al.  Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. , 2002, JAMA.

[4]  Edward H. Wagner,et al.  Self-Management aspects of the improving chronic illness care breakthrough series: Implementation with diabetes and heart failure teams , 2002, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[5]  John H Wasson,et al.  Microsystems in health care: Part 1. Learning from high-performing front-line clinical units. , 2002, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[6]  Thomas Bodenheimer,et al.  Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. , 2002, JAMA.

[7]  Michael J Barry,et al.  Health Decision Aids To Facilitate Shared Decision Making in Office Practice , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  W. Levinson,et al.  Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. , 1999, JAMA.

[9]  J. Wasson,et al.  Telephone care as a substitute for routine clinic follow-up. , 1992, JAMA.

[10]  T. Bodenheimer,et al.  Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. , 2002, JAMA.

[11]  M. Hamel,et al.  An Easy Way To Measure Quality of Physician‐Patient Interactions , 1998, The Journal of ambulatory care management.

[12]  John H Wasson,et al.  Microsystems in health care: Part 3. Planning patient-centered services. , 2003, Joint Commission journal on quality and safety.