E-TAN, a technology-enhanced platform with tangible objects for the assessment of visual neglect: A multiple single-case study

AbstractVisual neglect is a frequent and disabling consequence of right brain damage. Traditional paper-and- pencil tests of neglect have limitations in sensitivity and ecological validity. The Baking Tray Task (BTT), instead, approaches real-life situations, because it requires participants to place 16 physical objects on a board. The number of objects placed on the left and right portions of the board provides a clinical index of visual neglect. Here we present E-TAN, a technology-enhanced platform which allows patients to perform an enhanced version of the BTT (E-BTT). This platform automatically determines the object locations on the board, and also records the sequence and timing of their placement. We used E-BTT to test 9 patients with right hemisphere damage, and compared their performance with that obtained by 115 healthy participants. To this end, we developed a new method of analysis of participants’ performance, based on the use of the convex hull described by the objects on the board. This measure provides an estimate of the portion of space processed by each participant, and can effectively discriminate neglect patients from patients without neglect. E-TAN allows clinicians to assess visuospatial performance by using a convenient, fast, and relatively automatized procedure, that patients can even perform at home to follow-up the effects of rehabilitation.

[1]  M. Albert.  A simple test of visual neglect , 1973, Neurology.

[2]  E. Renzi,et al.  Normative Data and Screening Power of a Shortened Version of the Token Test , 1978, Cortex.

[3]  W. Eddy.  Convex Hull Peeling , 1982 .

[4]  William H. Press,et al.  Recursive stratified sampling for multidimensional Monte Carlo integration , 1990 .

[5]  P Bartolomeo,et al.  Early orientation of attention toward the half space ipsilateral to the lesion in patients with unilateral brain damage. , 1991, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[6]  P Bartolomeo,et al.  The relationship between visuospatial and representational neglect , 1994, Neurology.

[7]  Kerstin Tham,et al.  The baking tray task: a test of spatial neglect. , 1996, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[8]  Paolo Bartolomeo,et al.  The Novelty Effect in Recovered Hemineglect , 1997, Cortex.

[9]  J. Driver,et al.  Visual Neglect , 1998 .

[10]  P. Bartolomeo,et al.  Perception and action in hemispatial neglect , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  Sylvie Chokron,et al.  Egocentric frame of reference: its role in spatial biasafter right hemisphere lesions , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  Paolo Bartolomeo,et al.  Inhibitory processes and spatial bias after right hemisphere damage , 2000 .

[13]  P Bartolomeo,et al.  [Presenting a battery for assessing spatial neglect. Norms and effects of age, educational level, sex, hand and laterality]. , 2001, Revue neurologique.

[14]  Roberta Perri,et al.  Left hand movements and right hemisphere activation in unilateral spatial neglect: a test of the interhemispheric imbalance hypothesis , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Heikki Hamalainen,et al.  Initial Rightward Orienting Bias in Clinical Tasks: Normal Subjects and Right Hemispheric Stroke Patients With and Without Neglect , 2002, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[16]  Luigi Tesio,et al.  Behavioral assessment of unilateral neglect: study of the psychometric properties of the Catherine Bergego Scale. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  M. Jane Riddoch,et al.  Test–retest stability of three tests for unilateral visual neglect in patients with stroke: Star Cancellation, Line Bisection, and the Baking Tray Task , 2004 .

[18]  D. S. Fraser,et al.  Mixed reality environments in stroke rehabilitation: Development as rehabilitation tools , 2004 .

[19]  Paolo Bartolomeo,et al.  A battery of tests for the quantitative assessment of unilateral neglect. , 2006, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[20]  P. Bartolomeo,et al.  Impaired orienting of attention in left unilateral neglect: a componential analysis. , 2007, Neuropsychology.

[21]  Marika Urbanski,et al.  Line bisection in left neglect: The importance of starting right , 2008, Cortex.

[22]  Hans-Otto Karnath,et al.  A simple measure of neglect severity , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  M. Bonato,et al.  Neglect and Extinction Depend Greatly on Task Demands: A Review , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[24]  Lea Landucci,et al.  Natural Interactive System for Hemispatial Neglect Rehabilitation , 2013, ICIAP Workshops.

[25]  Francisco José Madrid-Cuevas,et al.  Automatic generation and detection of highly reliable fiducial markers under occlusion , 2014, Pattern Recognit..

[26]  Giuseppe Riva,et al.  Virtual Reality as Allocentric/Egocentric Technology for the Assessment of Cognitive Decline in the Elderly , 2014, MMVR.

[27]  Paolo Bartolomeo,et al.  Attention Disorders After Right Brain Damage , 2014 .

[28]  Fabrizio Ferrara,et al.  Tangible Interfaces for Cognitive Assessment and Training in Children: LogicART , 2016 .

[29]  Donghwa Jeong,et al.  SIG-Blocks: Tangible game technology for automated cognitive assessment , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  Alessio Facchin,et al.  Normative data for distal line bisection and baking tray task , 2016, Neurological Sciences.

[31]  Raffaele Di Fuccio,et al.  Digital and Multisensory Storytelling: Narration with Smell, Taste and Touch , 2016, EC-TEL.

[32]  Noritaka Kawashima,et al.  Intentional gaze shift to neglected space: a compensatory strategy during recovery after unilateral spatial neglect. , 2016, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  M Rabuffetti,et al.  Differential actigraphy for monitoring asymmetry in upper limb motor activities , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[34]  Roberto Cubelli,et al.  Definition: Spatial neglect , 2017, Cortex.

[35]  Roberta Daini,et al.  Rehabilitation of right (personal) neglect by prism adaptation: A case report. , 2017, Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[36]  Antonio Cerrato,et al.  Enhancing Neuropsychological Testing with Gamification and Tangible Interfaces: The Baking Tray Task , 2017, IWINAC.

[37]  Onofrio Gigliotta,et al.  Pseudoneglect in Visual Search: Behavioral Evidence and Connectional Constraints in Simulated Neural Circuitry , 2017, eNeuro.

[38]  Henrik Hautop Lund,et al.  Playful Cognitive Training with Physical Interactive Tiles for Elderly , 2018, 2018 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Robotics (ICT-ROBOT).

[39]  Antonio Cerrato,et al.  Augmented Reality: from education and training applications to assessment procedures , 2018 .

[40]  Keith Muir,et al.  Efficacy of home-based visuomotor feedback training in stroke patients with chronic hemispatial neglect , 2019, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[41]  Antonio Cerrato,et al.  Using technology and tangible interfaces in a visuospatial cognition task: the case of the baking tray task , 2019, PSYCHOBIT.

[42]  Antonio Cerrato,et al.  The Assessment of Visuospatial Abilities with Tangible Interfaces and Machine Learning , 2019, IWINAC.

[43]  Antonio Cerrato,et al.  The Importance of Spatial Abilities in Creativity and Their Assessment Through Tangible Interfaces , 2019, MIS4TEL.

[44]  Proceedings of the First Symposium on Psychology-Based Technologies co-located with XXXII National Congress of Italian Association of Psychology - Development and Education section (AIP 2019), Naples, Italy, 25-26 September, 2019 , 2019, PSYCHOBIT.