Do Monocular Time-to-Collision Estimates Necessarily Involve Perceived Distance?

Motivated by the debate between indirect and direct theories of perception, a large number of researchers have attempted to determine whether judgments of time to collision are based on the ratio of perceived distance to perceived speed or on the ratio θ/(d θ/dt), ie tau. Despite the considerable research effort devoted to this question there seems to be no clear resolution. We used a staircase tracking procedure to estimate errors in estimating time to collision for a simulated approaching object. To investigate the role of perceived distance in the judgment of time to collision, we asked observers to alternate between two viewing distances (100 and 500 cm). For the 500 cm viewing distance, we magnified the visual display by a factor of five so that the retinal images [and the values of θ/(d θ/dt) through time] were identical for the two viewing distances. All visual cues to distance were available. There were no significant differences between estimates of time to collision made at the two viewing distances. We conclude that our observers ignored perceived distance when estimating time to collision and based their responses on θ/(dθ/dt). We concur with recent proposals that, in the future, time-to-collision research should move away from the either/or analysis of different information sources that has dominated previous studies towards investigations of how different information sources are integrated.

[1]  James R. Tresilian,et al.  Perceptual and motor processes in interceptive timing , 1994 .

[2]  V Cavallo,et al.  Visual Information and Skill Level in Time-To-Collision Estimation , 1988, Perception.

[3]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[4]  D. Regan,et al.  Dissociation of discrimination thresholds for time to contact and for rate of angular expansion , 1993, Vision Research.

[5]  J. Tresilian.  Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  H. Ross,et al.  Optic-Flow and Cognitive Factors in Time-to-Collision Estimates , 1983, Perception.

[7]  P R DeLucia,et al.  Pictorial and motion-based information for depth perception. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  M. Landy,et al.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion , 1995, Vision Research.

[9]  Bruce Abernethy,et al.  Visual information for the timing of skilled movements: A review , 1992 .

[10]  B G Bardy,et al.  On the role of global and local visual information in goal-directed walking. , 1992, Acta psychologica.

[11]  O. Meijer,et al.  Complex movement behaviour : 'the' motor-action controversy , 1988 .

[12]  J R Lishman,et al.  Misperception of Time-to-Collision by Drivers in Pedestrian Accidents , 1993, Perception.

[13]  W Schiff,et al.  Information Used in Judging Impending Collision , 1979, Perception.

[14]  P R DeLucia,et al.  Pictorial and motion-based depth information during active control of self-motion: size-arrival effects on collision avoidance. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  G. J. Savelsbergh,et al.  Grasping tau. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  D. Regan,et al.  Estimating the time to collision with a rotating nonspherical object , 2000, Vision Research.

[17]  D Regan,et al.  Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information , 1998, Vision Research.

[18]  R. Bootsma,et al.  On the information-based regulation of movement: What Wann (1996) may want to consider , 1997 .

[19]  Reinoud J. Bootsma,et al.  Chapter 6 Visual Control of an Attacking Forehand Drive in Table Tennis , 1988 .

[20]  D Regan,et al.  Motion in depth: Adequate and inadequate simulation , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .