Unravelling the complex structure of forest soil food webs: higher omnivory and more trophic levels

Food web topologies depict the community structure as distributions of feeding interactions across populations. Although the soil ecosystem provides important functions for aboveground ecosystems, data on complex soil food webs is notoriously scarce, most likely due to the difficulty of sampling and characterizing the system. To fill this gap we assembled the complex food webs of 48 forest soil communities. The food webs comprise 89 to 168 taxa and 729 to 3344 feeding interactions. The feeding links were established by combining several molecular methods (stable isotope, fatty acid and molecular gut content analyses) with feeding trials and literature data. First, we addressed whether soil food webs (n = 48) differ significantly from those of other ecosystem types (aquatic and terrestrial aboveground, n = 77) by comparing 22 food web parameters. We found that our soil food webs are characterized by many omnivorous and cannibalistic species, more trophic chains and intraguild-predation motifs than other food webs and high average and maximum trophic levels. Despite this, we also found that soil food webs have a similar connectance as other ecosystems, but interestingly a higher link density and clustering coefficient. These differences in network structure to other ecosystem types may be a result of ecosystem specific constraints on hunting and feeding characteristics of the species that emerge as network parameters at the food-web level. In a second analysis of land-use effects, we found significant but only small differences of soil food web structure between different beech and coniferous forest types, which may be explained by generally strong selection effects of the soil that are independent of human land use. Overall, our study has unravelled some systematic structures of soil food-webs, which extends our mechanistic understanding how environmental characteristics of the soil ecosystem determine patterns at the community level.

[1]  S. Scheu,et al.  Effects of prey quality and predator body size on prey DNA detection success in a centipede predator , 2014, Molecular ecology.

[2]  Florian D. Schneider,et al.  Body masses, functional responses and predator-prey stability. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[3]  S. Scheu.  The soil food web: structure and perspectives , 2002 .

[4]  P. Giller.  The diversity of soil communities, the ‘poor man's tropical rainforest’ , 1996, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[5]  S. Scheu,et al.  The soil food web of two beech forests (Fagus sylvatica) of contrasting humus type: stable isotope analysis of a macro- and a mesofauna-dominated community , 2000, Oecologia.

[6]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  Food web patterns and their consequences , 1991, Nature.

[7]  Anders Nielsen,et al.  Conservation of species interaction networks , 2010 .

[8]  Owen L Petchey,et al.  Size, foraging, and food web structure , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Jens O. Riede,et al.  Body sizes, cumulative and allometric degree distributions across natural food webs , 2011 .

[10]  G. Uetz,et al.  Foraging strategies of spiders. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Two degrees of separation in complex food webs , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  R. Guimerà,et al.  Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks , 2005, Nature.

[13]  Barbara Drossel,et al.  Interactive effects of body-size structure and adaptive foraging on food-web stability. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[14]  Jens Nieschulze,et al.  Implementing large-scale and long-term functional biodiversity research: The Biodiversity Exploratories , 2010 .

[15]  M. Vanderklift,et al.  Sources of variation in consumer-diet δ15N enrichment: a meta-analysis , 2003, Oecologia.

[16]  Björn C. Rall,et al.  Phylogenetic grouping, curvature and metabolic scaling in terrestrial invertebrates. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[17]  Dominique Gravel,et al.  Persistence Increases with Diversity and Connectance in Trophic Metacommunities , 2011, PloS one.

[18]  Björn C. Rall,et al.  Climate change effects on macrofaunal litter decomposition: the interplay of temperature, body masses and stoichiometry , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  S. Scheu,et al.  Free‐living nematodes as prey for higher trophic levels of forest soil food webs , 2014 .

[20]  Björn C. Rall,et al.  Taxonomic versus allometric constraints on non‐linear interaction strengths , 2011 .

[21]  Florian D. Schneider,et al.  Beyond diversity: how nested predator effects control ecosystem functions. , 2013, The Journal of animal ecology.

[22]  D. Walter,et al.  Species, guilds, and functional groups: taxonomy and behavior in nematophagous arthropods. , 1989, Journal of nematology.

[23]  B. Klarner,et al.  Trophic shift of soil animal species with forest type as indicated by stable isotope analysis , 2014 .

[24]  Jens O. Riede,et al.  Size-based food web characteristics govern the response to species extinctions , 2011 .

[25]  U. Brose,et al.  Habitat structure and prey aggregation determine the functional response in a soil predator–prey interaction , 2010 .

[26]  Jean-Pierre Gabriel,et al.  Phylogenetic constraints and adaptation explain food-web structure , 2004, Nature.

[27]  Neo D. Martinez.  Constant Connectance in Community Food Webs , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[28]  Ulrich Brose,et al.  Robustness to secondary extinctions: Comparing trait-based sequential deletions in static and dynamic food webs , 2011 .

[29]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Simple rules yield complex food webs , 2000, Nature.

[30]  Florian D. Schneider,et al.  Climate change in size-structured ecosystems , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  S. Scheu,et al.  Feeding guilds in Collembola based on nitrogen stable isotope ratios , 2005 .

[32]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Understanding food-web persistence from local to global scales. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[33]  J. Elser,et al.  Soil acidity, ecological stoichiometry and allometric scaling in grassland food webs , 2009, Global Change Biology.

[34]  S. Scheu,et al.  Efficiency of two widespread non-destructive extraction methods under dry soil conditions for different ecological earthworm groups , 2008 .

[35]  A. Macfadyen.  Improved Funnel-Type Extractors for Soil Arthropods , 1961 .

[36]  K. Christiansen.  Bionomics of Collembola , 1964 .

[37]  R. Solé,et al.  Ecological networks and their fragility , 2006, Nature.

[38]  Marta Sales-Pardo,et al.  Evolutionary Conservation of Species’ Roles in Food Webs , 2012, Science.

[39]  U. Brose,et al.  Allometric functional response model: body masses constrain interaction strengths. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[40]  T. Poser.  Chilopoden als Prädatoren in einem Laubwald , 1988, Pedobiologia.

[41]  Ulrich Brose,et al.  Allometric degree distributions facilitate food-web stability , 2007, Nature.

[42]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: robustness increases with connectance , 2002, Ecology Letters.

[43]  M. Traugott,et al.  Which prey sustains cold‐adapted invertebrate generalist predators in arable land? Examining prey choices by molecular gut‐content analysis , 2011 .

[44]  Björn C. Rall,et al.  The dynamics of food chains under climate change and nutrient enrichment , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  S. Scheu,et al.  Unveiling soil food web links: New PCR assays for detection of prey DNA in the gut of soil arthropod predators , 2013 .

[46]  Owen T Lewis,et al.  Structural dynamics and robustness of food webs. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[47]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[48]  D. Post.  USING STABLE ISOTOPES TO ESTIMATE TROPHIC POSITION: MODELS, METHODS, AND ASSUMPTIONS , 2002 .

[49]  S. Scheu,et al.  Trophic niche differentiation in soil microarthropods (Oribatida, Acari): evidence from stable isotope ratios (15N/14N) , 2004 .

[50]  E. Berlow,et al.  Foraging theory predicts predator-prey energy fluxes. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[51]  Ulrich Brose,et al.  Effects of environmental warming and drought on size-structured soil food webs , 2014 .

[52]  Ulrich Brose,et al.  Body‐mass constraints on foraging behaviour determine population and food‐web dynamics , 2010 .

[53]  S. Scheu,et al.  Variations in prey consumption of centipede predators in forest soils as indicated by molecular gut content analysis , 2014 .

[54]  K. Cummins,et al.  Structure and Function of Stream Ecosystems , 1974 .

[55]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  Consumer-resource body-size relationships in natural food webs. , 2006, Ecology.

[56]  S. Scheu,et al.  Do oribatid mites live in enemy-free space? Evidence from feeding experiments with the predatory mite Pergamasus septentrionalis , 2006 .

[57]  Jens O. Riede,et al.  Scaling of Food-Web Properties with Diversity and Complexity Across Ecosystems , 2010 .

[58]  C. Körner,et al.  The underestimated importance of belowground carbon input for forest soil animal food webs. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[59]  D. Coleman.  Soil Biota, Soil Systems, and Processes , 2013 .

[60]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Food webs: reconciling the structure and function of biodiversity. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[61]  D. Reichle,et al.  Significance of spider predation in the energy dynamics of forest-floor arthropod communities , 1972 .

[62]  B. Klarner,et al.  Trophic diversity and niche partitioning in a species rich predator guild – Natural variations in stable isotope ratios (13C/12C, 15N/14N) of mesostigmatid mites (Acari, Mesostigmata) from Central European beech forests , 2013 .

[63]  Florian D. Schneider,et al.  Body mass constraints on feeding rates determine the consequences of predator loss. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[64]  B. Nolet,et al.  The effect of herbivores on genotypic diversity in a clonal aquatic plant , 2014 .

[65]  S. Scheu,et al.  Biodiversity and Litter Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems , 2005 .

[66]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Food-web structure and network theory: The role of connectance and size , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[67]  B. Peterson,et al.  STABLE ISOTOPES IN ECOSYSTEM STUDIES , 1987 .

[68]  S. Scheu,et al.  Trophic interactions in centipedes (Chilopoda, Myriapoda) as indicated by fatty acid patterns: Variations with life stage, forest age and season , 2012 .

[69]  S. Scheu,et al.  Shifts in trophic interactions with forest type in soil generalist predators as indicated by complementary analyses of fatty acids and stable isotopes , 2014 .

[70]  Ulrich Brose,et al.  Habitat structure alters top-down control in litter communities , 2012, Oecologia.

[71]  Björn C. Rall,et al.  Litter elemental stoichiometry and biomass densities of forest soil invertebrates , 2014 .

[72]  Annette Ostling,et al.  Unified spatial scaling of species and their trophic interactions , 2004, Nature.

[73]  P. Lavelle.  Faunal Activities and Soil Processes: Adaptive Strategies That Determine Ecosystem Function , 1997 .

[74]  Jennifer A. Dunne,et al.  Network structure and robustness of marine food webs , 2004 .

[75]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Universal temperature and body-mass scaling of feeding rates , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[76]  Daniel B. Stouffer,et al.  Evidence for the existence of a robust pattern of prey selection in food webs , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.