Bounds and Algorithms for Fast Exact Searches of Chemical Fingerprints in Linear and Sublinear Time

Chemical fingerprints are used to represent chemical molecules by recording the presence or absence, or by counting the number of occurrences, of particular features or substructures, such as labeled paths in the 2D graph of bonds, of the corresponding molecule. These fingerprint vectors are used to search large databases of small molecules, currently containing millions of entries, using various similarity measures, such as the Tanimoto or Tversky's measures and their variants. Here, we derive simple bounds on these similarity measures and show how these bounds can be used to considerably reduce the subset of molecules that need to be searched. We consider both the case of single-molecule and multiple-molecule queries, as well as queries based on fixed similarity thresholds or aimed at retrieving the top K hits. We study the speedup as a function of query size and distribution, fingerprint length, similarity threshold, and database size |D| and derive analytical formulas that are in excellent agreement with empirical values. The theoretical considerations and experiments show that this approach can provide linear speedups of one or more orders of magnitude in the case of searches with a fixed threshold, and achieve sublinear speedups in the range of O(|D|0.6) for the top K hits in current large databases. This pruning approach yields subsecond search times across the 5 million compounds in the ChemDB database, without any loss of accuracy.

[1]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Similarity Search Profiling Reveals Effects of Fingerprint Scaling in Virtual Screening. , 2005 .

[2]  W. Guida,et al.  The art and practice of structure‐based drug design: A molecular modeling perspective , 1996, Medicinal research reviews.

[3]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[4]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  ChemDB: a public database of small molecules and related chemoinformatics resources , 2005, Bioinform..

[5]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Kernels for small molecules and the prediction of mutagenicity, toxicity and anti-cancer activity , 2005, ISMB.

[6]  Joseph S. Verducci,et al.  A Modification of the Jaccard–Tanimoto Similarity Index for Diverse Selection of Chemical Compounds Using Binary Strings , 2002, Technometrics.

[7]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Graph kernels for chemical informatics , 2005, Neural Networks.

[8]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Profile Scaling Increases the Similarity Search Performance of Molecular Fingerprints Containing Numerical Descriptors and Structural Keys , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[9]  時實 象一 Computer storage and retrieval of generic chemical structures , 1987 .

[10]  P Willett,et al.  Grouping of coefficients for the calculation of inter-molecular similarity and dissimilarity using 2D fragment bit-strings. , 2002, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[11]  D J Wild,et al.  VisualiSAR: a web-based application for clustering, structure browsing, and structure-activity relationship study. , 1999, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[12]  J. Irwin,et al.  ZINC ? A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening. , 2005 .

[13]  M Rarey,et al.  Detailed analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[14]  Dennis H. Rouvray,et al.  Definition and role of similarity concepts in the chemical and physical sciences , 1992, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[15]  David Weininger,et al.  Stigmata: An Algorithm To Determine Structural Commonalities in Diverse Datasets , 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[16]  Darren R. Flower,et al.  On the Properties of Bit String-Based Measures of Chemical Similarity , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..