Improving domain definition and outcome instrument selection: Lessons learned for OMERACT from imaging.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Win Min Oo | M. D. de Wit | D. Beaton | M. Boers | M. D’Agostino | L. Terslev | P. Conaghan | L. Maxwell | M. Østergaard | W. Maksymowych | A. Hoens | V. Sloan | A. Doria | M. V. van Rossum | R. Christensen | C. Hofstetter | P. Bird | Codruța Zăbălan | T. Serban | Sam Michel Cembalo
[1] N. Obuchowski,et al. Importance of incorporating quantitative imaging biomarker technical performance characteristics when estimating treatment effects , 2021, Clinical trials.
[2] L. Mokkink,et al. COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study , 2020, BMC Medical Research Methodology.
[3] P. Tugwell,et al. Instrument Selection Using the OMERACT Filter 2.1: The OMERACT Methodology , 2019, The Journal of Rheumatology.
[4] P. Tugwell,et al. Core Domain Set Selection According to OMERACT Filter 2.1: The OMERACT Methodology , 2019, The Journal of Rheumatology.
[5] A. Iagnocco,et al. The OMERACT Stepwise Approach to Select and Develop Imaging Outcome Measurement Instruments: The Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Example , 2019, The Journal of Rheumatology.
[6] P. Tugwell,et al. OMERACT Filter 2.1: Elaboration of the Conceptual Framework for Outcome Measurement in Health Intervention Studies , 2019, The Journal of Rheumatology.
[7] Nancy A Obuchowski,et al. Statistical Considerations for Planning Clinical Trials with Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers. , 2018, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[8] N. Obuchowski,et al. Statistics for Radiology Research , 2017, Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology.
[9] Nancy A. Obuchowski,et al. Testing for interchangeability of imaging tests. , 2014, Academic radiology.
[10] P. Tugwell,et al. Developing core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT filter 2.0. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[11] Nancy A Obuchowski,et al. Effect of computer-aided detection for CT colonography in a multireader, multicase trial. , 2010, Radiology.
[12] N. Obuchowski,et al. Bias, underestimation of risk, and loss of statistical power in patient-level analyses of lesion detection , 2010, European Radiology.
[13] N. Obuchowski. Reference values: no need for confusion. , 2009, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[14] Nancy A Obuchowski,et al. Reducing the number of reader interpretations in MRMC studies. , 2009, Academic radiology.
[15] M. Suarez‐Almazor,et al. Development and preliminary psychometric testing of a new OA pain measure--an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. , 2008, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.
[16] S. Shiffman,et al. Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. , 2008, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[17] Nancy A Obuchowski,et al. Special Topics III: bias. , 2003, Radiology.
[18] P. Tugwell,et al. The OMERACT filter for Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. , 1998, The Journal of rheumatology.
[19] P. Tugwell,et al. Chapter 33 – Assessment of Health Outcomes , 2017 .