Online versus face-to-face deliberation: Who? Why? What? With what effects?

Although there has been much speculation regarding the strengths and weaknesses of face-to-face versus online deliberative settings, no studies have systematically compared the two. Drawing on a national sample of Americans who reported deliberating face-to-face and/or online, we examine these two deliberative settings with regard to the participants, the motivations, the process, and the effects. Our findings, although tentative, suggest that the two settings are distinct in several important ways. Relative to face-to-face deliberation, online deliberation over-represents young, male, and white users, attracts more ideological moderates, generates more negative emotions, and is less likely to result in consensus and political action. At the same time, online deliberators perceived online settings as more politically and racially diverse. Implications for understanding the democratic potential of different forms of deliberation are discussed.

[1]  Young Min Baek,et al.  WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON? , 2009 .

[2]  K. A. Hill,et al.  Computer-Mediated Political Communication: The USENET and Political Communities , 1997 .

[3]  H. Arendt.  Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought , 1968 .

[4]  L. Sanders,et al.  Against Deliberation , 1997 .

[5]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the "true self" on the Internet. , 2002 .

[6]  Zizi Papacharissi.  The virtual sphere , 2002, New Media Soc..

[7]  Thomas E. Patterson,et al.  The vanishing voter : public involvement in an age of uncertainty , 2002 .

[8]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley,et al.  Diversity of Political Conversation on the Internet: Users' Perspectives , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[9]  James S. Fishkin,et al.  Considered Opinions: Deliberative Polling in Britain , 2002 .

[10]  Tali Mendelberg.  THE DELIBERATIVE CITIZEN: THEORY AND EVIDENCE , 2009 .

[11]  Mark E. Warren,et al.  Democracy and Trust: Frontmatter , 1999 .

[12]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiryinto a category of bourgeois society , 1991 .

[13]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[14]  W. Barnett Pearce,et al.  Moral Conflict: When Social Worlds Collide , 1997 .

[15]  John Gastil,et al.  Increasing Political Sophistication Through Public Deliberation , 1999 .

[16]  T. Postmes,et al.  Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? Side-Effects of Computer-Mediated Communication. , 2002 .

[17]  M. Jennings,et al.  Internet Use and Civic Engagement: A Longitudinal Analysis , 2003 .

[18]  Mark E. Warren,et al.  Democratic Theory and Self-Transformation , 1992, American Political Science Review.

[19]  Catherine Good,et al.  When White Men Can't Do Math: Necessary and Sufficient Factors in Stereotype Threat , 1999 .

[20]  Dietlind Stolle,et al.  Mobilizing Consumers to Take Responsibility for Global Social Justice , 2007 .

[21]  Michael X. Delli Carpini,et al.  Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America , 2009 .

[22]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Plan 9 From Cyberspace: The Implications of the Internet for Personality and Social Psychology , 2000 .

[23]  Steven L. Blader,et al.  A Four-Component Model of Procedural Justice: Defining the Meaning of a “Fair” Process , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[24]  T. Shakespeare,et al.  Observational Studies , 2003 .

[25]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Intergroup competition for the provision of step‐level public goods: Effects of preplay communication , 1988 .

[26]  Mervi Pantti,et al.  Do Crying Citizens Make Good Citizens? , 2006 .

[27]  David F. Sally.  Conversation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas , 1995 .

[28]  Benjamin I. Page.  Who Deliberates?: Mass Media in Modern Democracy , 1996 .

[29]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  Online Groups and Political Discourse: Do Online Discussion Spaces Facilitate Exposure to Political Disagreement? , 2009 .

[30]  James S. Fishkin,et al.  The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy , 1995 .

[31]  C. Sunstein.  Republic.com , 2001 .

[32]  Alain Boyer.  Democracy and Disagreement , 1995 .

[33]  Edmund F. Byrne,et al.  Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political , 1999 .

[34]  A. Kluge,et al.  Public Sphere and Experience: Toward an Analysis of the Bourgeois and Proletarian Public Sphere , 1993 .

[35]  S. Tefft.  Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2002 .

[36]  Tali Mendelberg,et al.  Race and Public Deliberation , 2000 .

[37]  Nancy Fraser.  Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy , 2016, Public Space Reader.

[38]  C. Mouffe.  The Democratic Paradox , 2000 .

[39]  Michael Walzer,et al.  Politics and Passion: Toward a More Egalitarian Liberalism , 2004 .

[40]  Robert E. Denton.  Religion and the 2004 Presidential Campaign , 2005 .

[41]  H. Haja Mydin.  On Liberty , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[42]  Diana C. Mutz.  Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice , 2002, American Political Science Review.

[43]  T. Postmes,et al.  Social Movement Participation in the Digital Age , 2002 .

[44]  R. Garrett,et al.  Protest in an Information Society: a review of literature on social movements and new ICTs , 2006 .

[45]  S. Keeter,et al.  A New Engagement , 2006 .