Hierarchy of spatial interactions in the processing of contrast-defined contours.

Both psychophysical and neurophysiological evidence suggest that there are two visual cortical processing streams, a linear stream that processes first-order stimuli and a nonlinear stream that also processes second-order stimuli. This evidence also suggests that before the extraction of the second-order signal, the nonlinear pathway broadly but not completely pools signals across initial linear filters that encode the orientation of the carrier of the second-order signal. The evidence suggests that such pooling does not occur across carrier spatial frequencies. We show that similar results are obtained with repulsion tilt illusions but not with attraction effects. Attraction effects exhibit complete orientation crossover (while retaining spatial frequency selectivity), perhaps indicating higher-level processing; an experiment on interocular transfer of the effects supported this conclusion.

[1]  D. Hubel,et al.  Ferrier lecture - Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[2]  J A Movshon,et al.  Interocular Transfer in Normal Humans, and Those Who Lack Stereopsis , 1972, Perception.

[3]  J. R. Harris,et al.  TWO DIFFERENT AFTER-EFFECTS OF EXPOSURE TO VISUAL TILTS. , 1965, The American journal of psychology.

[4]  C. Baker.  Central neural mechanisms for detecting second-order motion , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[5]  H. Wilson,et al.  Fourier and Non-Fourier Pattern Discrimination Compared , 1996, Vision Research.

[6]  C. Clifford,et al.  A functional angle on some after-effects in cortical vision , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  J. Gibson,et al.  Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies , 1937 .

[8]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Does early non-linearity account for second-order motion? , 1999, Vision Research.

[9]  G. B. Wetherill,et al.  SEQUENTIAL ESTIMATION OF POINTS ON A PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION. , 1965, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[10]  David Whitaker,et al.  Spatial characteristics of the second-order visual pathway revealed by positional adaptation , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  P. Wenderoth,et al.  The different mechanisms of the direct and indirect tilt illusions , 1988, Vision Research.

[12]  G. J. Burton,et al.  Evidence for non-linear response processes in the human visual system from measurements on the thresholds of spatial beat frequencies. , 1973, Vision research.

[13]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Some experiments bearing on the hypothesis that the visual system analyses spatial patterns in independent bands of spatial frequency , 1975, Vision Research.

[14]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex , 1982, Vision Research.

[15]  G. Sperling,et al.  Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[16]  R. van der Zwan,et al.  Evidence that both area V1 and extrastriate visual cortex contribute to symmetry perception , 1998, Current Biology.

[17]  Nicholas J. Wade,et al.  The influence of colour and contour rivalry on the magnitude of the tilt illusion , 1980, Vision Research.

[18]  Isabelle Mareschal,et al.  A cortical locus for the processing of contrast-defined contours , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  C. Baker,et al.  Temporal and spatial response to second-order stimuli in cat area 18. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  P Wenderoth,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for area V2 involvement in the reduction of subjective contour tilt aftereffects by binocular rivalry , 1994, Visual Neuroscience.

[21]  P. Wenderoth,et al.  The Differential Effects of Brief Exposures and Surrounding Contours on Direct and Indirect Tilt Illusions , 1988, Perception.

[22]  N. Graham,et al.  Spatial-frequency- and orientation-selectivity of simple and complex channels in region segregation , 1993, Vision Research.

[23]  H. Wilson,et al.  A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[24]  David R. Badcock,et al.  Detection of spatial beats: Non-linearity or contrast increment detection? , 1986, Vision Research.

[25]  C Ware,et al.  On interocular transfer of various visual aftereffects in normal and stereoblind observers. , 1974, Vision research.

[26]  Peter Wenderoth,et al.  The effects of exposure duration and surrounding frames on direct and indirect tilt aftereffects and illusions , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  C L Baker,et al.  A processing stream in mammalian visual cortex neurons for non-Fourier responses. , 1993, Science.

[28]  David J. Fleet,et al.  Linear filtering precedes nonlinear processing in early vision , 1996, Current Biology.

[29]  R. L. Valois,et al.  The orientation and direction selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex , 1982, Vision Research.

[30]  L. Poom,et al.  Inter-attribute tilt effects and orientation analysis in the visual brain , 2000, Vision Research.

[31]  J. Duin,et al.  On the relation of stereoacuity to interocular transfer of the motion and the tilt aftereffects , 1983, Vision Research.

[32]  J P Thomas,et al.  Uncertainty experiments support the roles of second-order mechanisms in spatial frequency and orientation discriminations. , 1996, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[33]  S. Dakin,et al.  Sensitivity to contrast modulation depends on carrier spatial frequency and orientation , 2000, Vision Research.

[34]  O. Creutzfeldt,et al.  Squint and the development of binocularity in humans , 1975, Nature.

[35]  P Wenderoth,et al.  Possible Neural Substrates for Orientation Analysis and Perception , 1987, Perception.

[36]  H R Wilson,et al.  Curvature and separation discrimination at texture boundaries. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[37]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Subjective contours, tilt aftereffects, and visual cortical organization , 1989, Vision Research.

[38]  Peter Wenderoth,et al.  Large repulsion, but not attraction, tilt illusions occur when stimulus parameters selectively favour either transient (M-like) or sustained (P-like) mechanisms , 1999, Vision Research.

[39]  Peter Wenderoth,et al.  Mechanisms of purely subjective contour tilt aftereffects , 1995, Vision Research.