Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting vs. bare metal stents in patients with diabetes mellitus: long-term follow-up in the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR).

AIMS Patients with diabetes mellitus have more extensive coronary artery disease, more disease progression, and restenosis. The use of drug-eluting stents (DES) in these patients is widespread, despite uncertain long-term safety and efficacy. METHODS AND RESULTS All consecutive patients with diabetes mellitus in Sweden who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were entered into the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR) during 2003-06 with complete follow-up for 1-4 years (median 2.5). Patients who received at least one DES (n = 4754) were compared with those who received only bare metal stents (BMS) (n = 4956) at the index procedure. Combined outcome of death or myocardial infarction (MI) showed no difference for DES vs. BMS, relative risk (RR), 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.77-1.06]. Myocardial infarction was significantly less common with DES in patients who received only one stent RR, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.66-0.96). The restenosis rate was 50% lower in DES-treated patients RR, 0.50 (95% CI, 0.35-0.70) and was associated with a higher adjusted RR of MI, RR, 5.03 (95% CI, 4.25-5.97). DES was associated with reduced restenosis rates in all subgroups of diabetic patients with the greatest benefit in stent diameters <3 mm or stent length >20 mm. The number of lesions treated with DES to prevent one restenosis ranged from 11 to 47 in various subgroups. CONCLUSION This real-life registry study shows that restenosis was halved by DES in diabetic patients with stable or unstable coronary disease, with similar risk of death or MI up to 4 years compared with BMS.

[1]  A. Siegbahn,et al.  Patients with poor responsiveness to thienopyridine treatment or with diabetes have lower levels of circulating active metabolite, but their platelets respond normally to active metabolite added ex vivo. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  S. Normand,et al.  Drug-Eluting or Bare-Metal Stenting in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Results From the Massachusetts Data Analysis Center Registry , 2008, Circulation.

[3]  M. Zwahlen,et al.  Incidence and correlates of drug-eluting stent thrombosis in routine clinical practice. 4-year results from a large 2-institutional cohort study. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  A. Kaltoft,et al.  Comparison of stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and mortality following drug-eluting versus bare-metal stent coronary intervention in patients with diabetes mellitus. , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  G. Stone,et al.  Paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents in patients with diabetes mellitus: pooled analysis from 5 randomized trials. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  L. Shaw,et al.  Clinical and angiographic correlates of short- and long-term mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  M. Pfisterer,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of drug-eluting stents in patients at high or low risk of major cardiac events in the Basel Stent KostenEffektivitäts Trial (BASKET): an 18-month analysis , 2007, The Lancet.

[8]  R. Blindt,et al.  Impact of the metabolic syndrome on angiographic and clinical events after coronary intervention using bare-metal or sirolimus-eluting stents. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  C. Macaya,et al.  Impact of platelet reactivity on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  Brett G. Sylvia,et al.  Comparison of outcomes using sirolimus-eluting stenting in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients with comparison of insulin versus non-insulin therapy in the diabetic patients. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  Ron Goeree,et al.  Effectiveness and safety of drug-eluting stents in Ontario. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Simon Wandel,et al.  Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis , 2007, The Lancet.

[13]  F. Fernández‐Avilés,et al.  Long-term clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in diabetic patients with de novo coronary stenoses: long-term results of the DIABETES trial. , 2007, European heart journal.

[14]  P. Serruys,et al.  Comparison of three-year clinical outcome of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the RESEARCH and T-SEARCH Registries). , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  Analysis of 14 trials comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  P. Serruys,et al.  A pooled analysis of data comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  A. Farb,et al.  Stent thrombosis redux--the FDA perspective. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  W. Maisel Unanswered questions--drug-eluting stents and the risk of late thrombosis. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Johan Lindbäck,et al.  Long-term outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in Sweden. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  S. Pocock,et al.  Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  J. Tijssen,et al.  Paclitaxel-eluting versus uncoated stents in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  Christoph Kaiser,et al.  Incremental cost-effectiveness of drug-eluting stents compared with a third-generation bare-metal stent in a real-world setting: randomised Basel Stent Kosten Effektivitäts Trial (BASKET) , 2005, The Lancet.

[23]  S. King Surgery Is Preferred for the Diabetic With Multivessel Disease , 2005, Circulation.

[24]  Peter Kearney,et al.  The Cardiology Audit and Registration Data Standards (CARDS), European data standards for clinical cardiology practice. , 2005, European heart journal.

[25]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Clinical, Angiographic, and Procedural Predictors of Angiographic Restenosis After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in Complex Patients: An Evaluation From the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) Study , 2004, Circulation.

[26]  E. Topol,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetic patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. , 2004, European heart journal.

[27]  D G Altman,et al.  Calculating the number needed to treat for trials where the outcome is time to an event , 1999, BMJ.

[28]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .