Risk measurement with equivalent utility principles

Risk measures have been studied for several decades in the actuarial literature, where they appeared under the guise of premium calculation principles. Risk measures and properties that risk measures should satisfy have recently received considerable attention in the financial mathematics literature. Mathematically, a risk measure is a mapping from a class of random variables to the real line. Economically, a risk measure should capture the preferences of the decision-maker. This paper complements the study initiated in Denuit, Dhaene & Van Wouwe (1999) and considers several theories for decision under uncertainty: the classical expected utility paradigm, Yaari's dual approach, maximin expected utility theory, Choquet expected utility theory and Quiggin's rank-dependent utility theory. Building on the actuarial equivalent utility pricing principle, broad classes of risk measures are generated, of which most classical risk measures appear to be particular cases. This approach shows that most risk measures studied recently in the financial mathematics literature disregard the utility concept (i.e., correspond to linear utilities), restricting their applicability. Some alternatives proposed in the literature are discussed.

[1]  Qihe Tang,et al.  Some New Classes of Consistent Risk Measures , 2004 .

[2]  Michel Denuit,et al.  Actuarial Theory for Dependent Risks: Measures, Orders and Models , 2005 .

[3]  Akihiko Inoue.  On the worst conditional expectation , 2001 .

[4]  M. Abdellaoui.  A Genuine Rank-Dependent Generalization of the Von Neumann-Morgenstern Expected Utility Theorem , 2002 .

[5]  D. Schmeidler.  Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity , 1989 .

[6]  Moshe Shaked,et al.  The s-convex orders among real random variables, with applications , 1998 .

[7]  Qihe Tang,et al.  A Comonotonic Image of Independence for Additive Risk Measures , 2004 .

[8]  Johannes Leitner.  A SHORT NOTE ON SECOND‐ORDER STOCHASTIC DOMINANCE PRESERVING COHERENT RISK MEASURES , 2005 .

[9]  F. Delbaen.  Coherent Risk Measures on General Probability Spaces , 2002 .

[10]  Gennady Samorodnitsky,et al.  Subadditivity Re–Examined: the Case for Value-at-Risk , 2005 .

[11]  Andreas Tsanakas,et al.  Risk Measures and Theories of Choice , 2003 .

[12]  M. Yaari.  The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk , 1987 .

[13]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Foundations of Statistics , 1955 .

[14]  G. Choquet.  Theory of capacities , 1954 .

[15]  Volker Krätschmer.  Robust representation of convex risk measures by probability measures , 2005, Finance Stochastics.

[16]  I. Gilboa.  Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities , 1987 .

[17]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  Fuzzy Measures and Integrals , 1995 .

[18]  S. Heilpern.  A rank-dependent generalization of zero utility principle , 2003 .

[19]  Abaxbank,et al.  Spectral Measures of Risk : a Coherent Representation of Subjective Risk Aversion , 2002 .

[20]  Qihe Tang,et al.  Capital requirements, risk measures and comonotonicity , 2004 .

[21]  M. Goovaerts,et al.  Properties of the Esscher premium calculation principle , 1989 .

[22]  R. Koenker,et al.  Pessimistic Portfolio Allocation and Choquet Expected Utility , 2004 .

[23]  A. Chateauneuf,et al.  Optimal risk-sharing rules and equilibria with Choquet-expected-utility , 2000 .

[24]  Shaun S. Wang,et al.  Axiomatic characterization of insurance prices , 1997 .

[25]  A. Chateauneuf,et al.  Choquet Pricing for Financial Markets with Frictions , 1996 .

[26]  B. Ripley,et al.  Robust Statistics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Geosciences.

[27]  Distortion Risk Measures and Economic Capital , 2004 .

[28]  Antoon Pelsser,et al.  On the Applicability of the Wang Transform for Pricing Financial Risks , 2008, ASTIN Bulletin.

[29]  D. Schmeidler.  Integral representation without additivity , 1986 .

[30]  K. Borch.  Equilibrium in a Reinsurance Market , 1962 .

[31]  M. Frittelli,et al.  Putting order in risk measures , 2002 .

[32]  Shaun S. Wang.  Premium Calculation by Transforming the Layer Premium Density , 1996, ASTIN Bulletin.

[33]  Guillaume Carlier,et al.  Core of convex distortions of a probability , 2003, J. Econ. Theory.

[34]  I. Meilijson,et al.  New Tools to Better Model Behavior Under Risk and UNcertainty: An Oevrview , 1997 .

[35]  R. Laeven.  Essays on Risk Measures and Stochastic Dependence, with Applications to Insurance and Finance , 2002 .

[36]  S. Guriev,et al.  On Microfoundations of the Dual Theory of Choice , 2001 .

[37]  Johannes Leitner.  BALAYAGE MONOTONOUS RISK MEASURES , 2004 .

[38]  Masaaki Kijima,et al.  On the significance of expected shortfall as a coherent risk measure , 2005 .

[39]  H. Geman.  Learning About Risk: Some Lessons from Insurance , 1999 .

[40]  J. Quiggin.  Generalized expected utility theory : the rank-dependent model , 1994 .

[41]  Massimo Marinacci,et al.  APPLIED MATHEMATICS WORKING PAPER SERIESChoquet Insurance Pricing: a Caveat ∗ , 2002 .

[42]  A. Chateauneuf,et al.  Diversification, convex preferences and non-empty core in the Choquet expected utility model , 2002 .

[43]  Marc Goovaerts,et al.  Ordering of actuarial risks , 1994 .

[44]  J. Dhaene,et al.  Can a Coherent Risk Measure Be Too Subadditive? , 2008 .

[45]  M. J. Goovaerts,et al.  On the characterization of Wang's class of premium principles , 1998 .

[46]  Peter P. Wakker,et al.  Under stochastic dominance Choquet-expected utility and anticipated utility are identical , 1990 .

[47]  Cuncun Luan.  INSURANCE PREMIUM CALCULATIONS WITH ANTICIPATED UTILITY THEORY , 2001 .

[48]  M. Goovaerts,et al.  Actuarial Risk Measures for Financial Derivative Pricing , 2006 .

[49]  Jan Dhaene,et al.  Economic Capital Allocation Derived from Risk Measures , 2002 .

[50]  Shaun S. Wang.  A CLASS OF DISTORTION OPERATORS FOR PRICING FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE RISKS , 2000 .

[51]  F. Delbaen.  Coherent risk measures , 2000 .

[52]  P. Wakker.  Preference Axiomatizations for Decision under Uncertainty , 2004 .

[53]  F. J. Anscombe,et al.  A Definition of Subjective Probability , 1963 .

[54]  Philippe Artzner,et al.  Coherent Measures of Risk , 1999 .

[55]  Masaaki Kijima,et al.  VaR is subject to a significant positive bias , 2004 .

[56]  F. Knight.  The economic nature of the firm: From Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit , 2009 .

[57]  Hans Bühlmann,et al.  Premium Calculation from Top Down , 1985, ASTIN Bulletin.

[58]  Johannes Leitner.  Dilatation monotonous Choquet integrals , 2005 .

[59]  E. Rowland.  Theory of Games and Economic Behavior , 1946, Nature.

[60]  Jan Dhaene,et al.  The Concept of Comonotonicity in Actuarial Science and Finance: Applications , 2002 .

[61]  L. Wasserman,et al.  SYMMETRIC, COHERENT, CHOQUET CAPACITIES , 1996 .

[62]  An Axiomatization of Cumulative Prospect Theory for Decision Under Risk , 1998 .

[63]  A. Röell.  Risk Aversion in Quiggin and Yaari's Rank-Order Model of Choice under Uncertainty , 1987 .

[64]  Shaun S. Wang.  A Universal Framework for Pricing Financial and Insurance Risks , 2002, ASTIN Bulletin.

[65]  H. Gerber,et al.  On convex principles of premium calculation , 1985 .

[66]  H. Gerber,et al.  On the representation of additive principles of premium calculation , 1981 .

[67]  Jan Dhaene,et al.  A Unified Approach to Generate Risk Measures , 2003, ASTIN Bulletin.

[68]  Alexander Schied,et al.  Convex measures of risk and trading constraints , 2002, Finance Stochastics.

[69]  Edward Furman,et al.  Weighted Premium Calculation Principles , 2006 .

[70]  C. Klüppelberg,et al.  A single number can't hedge against economic catastrophes , 1999 .

[71]  Jan Dhaene,et al.  Modern Actuarial Risk Theory , 2001 .

[72]  S. Kusuoka.  On law invariant coherent risk measures , 2001 .

[73]  N. Bäuerle,et al.  Stochastic Orders and Risk Measures: Consistency and Bounds , 2006 .

[74]  Michel Denuit,et al.  The economics of insurance: a review and some recent developments , 1999 .

[75]  J. Quiggin.  A theory of anticipated utility , 1982 .

[76]  Isaac Meilijson,et al.  Four notions of mean-preserving increase in risk, risk attitudes and applications to the rank-dependent expected utility model , 2004 .

[77]  Massimo Marinacci,et al.  APPLIED MATHEMATICS WORKING PAPER SERIESInsurance Premia Consistent with the Market ∗ , 2002 .

[78]  M. Sherris,et al.  Contingent claim pricing using probability distortion operators: methods from insurance risk pricing and their relationship to financial theory , 2003 .

[79]  Collin Carbno,et al.  Actuarial Theory for Dependent Risks: Measures, Orders, and Models , 2007, Technometrics.

[81]  Jan Dhaene,et al.  The Concept of Comonotonicity in Actuarial Science and Finance: Theory , 2002, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics.

[82]  I. Gilboa,et al.  Maxmin Expected Utility with Non-Unique Prior , 1989 .

[83]  A. D. Waegenaere,et al.  Choquet pricing and equilibrium , 2003 .