Efficient Design Module Capture and Representation for Product Family Reuse

New business models and more integrated product development processes require designers to make use of knowledge more efficiently. Capture and reuse are means of coping, but support, techniques, and mechanisms have yet to be sufficiently addressed. This paper consequently explores how computer-aided technologies (CAx) and a computer-aided design (CAD) model-oriented approach can be used to improve the efficiency of design module capture and representation for product family reuse. The first contribution of this paper is the investigation performed at a Swedish manufacturing company and a set of identified challenges related to design capture and representation for reuse in product family development. The second contribution is a demonstrated and evaluated set of systems and tools, which exemplifies how these challenges can be approached. Efficient design capture is achieved by a combination of automated and simplified design capture, derived from the design implementation (CAD model definition) to the extent possible. Different design representations can then be accessed by the designer using the CAD-internal tool interface. A web application is an example of more generalpurpose representation to tailor design content, all of which is managed by a product lifecycle management (PLM) system. Design capture is based on a modular view block definition, stored in formal information models, management by a PLM system, for consistent and reliable design content. It was, however, introduced to support the rich and expressive forms of capture and representation required to facilitate understanding, use, and reuse of varied and increasingly complex designs. A key element in being able to describe a complex design and its implementation has been capture and representation of a set of design states. The solution has been demonstrated to effectively be able to capture and represent significant portions of a step-by-step design training material and the implementation of complex design module through a set of design decisions taken. The validity and relevance of the proposed solution is strengthened by the level of acceptance and perceived value from experienced users, together with the fact that the company is implementing parts of it today.

[1]  Lennart Karlsson,et al.  A development process for Functional Products: hardware, software, service support system and management of operation , 2012 .

[2]  Jean-François Boujut,et al.  An annotation based approach to support design communication , 2007, ArXiv.

[3]  Jintae Lee,et al.  What's in design rationale? , 1991 .

[4]  John J. Mills,et al.  Design Intent in 2D CAD: Definition and Survey , 2006 .

[5]  Morteza Poorkiany,et al.  Design Rationale Management - a Proposed Cloud Solution , 2014, ISPE CE.

[6]  Jacob Buur,et al.  A theoretical approach to mechatronics design , 1990 .

[7]  Rob H. Bracewell,et al.  Capturing design rationale , 2009, Comput. Aided Des..

[8]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  The Lure of the Measurable in Design Research , 2004 .

[9]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  A Model-Based Framework to Overlap Product Development Activities , 1997 .

[10]  Jorge Dorribo Camba.  ANNOTATION MECHANISMS TO MANAGE DESIGN KNOWLEDGE IN COMPLEX PARAMETRIC MODELS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON ALTERATION AND REUSABILITY , 2015 .

[11]  Mats Näsström,et al.  Integrating Information in Product Development , 2013 .

[12]  Rob H. Bracewell,et al.  Improving Design Reuse Using Context , 2007 .

[13]  Mats Näsström,et al.  A Proposed Method to Preserve Knowledge and Information by Use of Knowledge Enabled Engineering , 2007 .

[14]  Lian Ding,et al.  The integration of lightweight representation and annotation for collaborative design representation , 2009 .

[15]  William J. Doll,et al.  Shared knowledge and product design glitches in integrated product development , 2008 .

[16]  Fredrik Elgh,et al.  Documentation and Management of Product Knowledge in a System for Automated Variant Design: A Case Study , 2010, ISPE CE.

[17]  Lucienne Blessing,et al.  DRM, a Design Research Methodology , 2009 .

[18]  Tobias Larsson,et al.  CHALLENGES FOR EXPERIENCE FEEDBACK IN ENGINEERING DESIGN , 2009 .

[19]  Chris A McMahon,et al.  Development and application of an integrated approach for parametric associative CAD design in an industrial context , 2011 .

[20]  Lars Hvam,et al.  The cost of customising: assessing the performance of a modular product programme , 2014 .

[21]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  THE BENEFITS OF PREDICTING CHANGE IN COMPLEX PRODUCTS: APPLICATION AREAS OF A DSM-BASED PREDICTION TOOL , 2004 .

[22]  Glen Mullineux,et al.  Capturing constraint evolution: a technique to preserve and handle design knowledge , 2011 .

[23]  Mats Näsström,et al.  An Empirical Study of Information Exchange and Design Support in Product Family Development , 2014 .

[24]  Jean-François Boujut,et al.  A Speech Act Theory-based information model to support design communication through annotations , 2009, Comput. Ind..

[25]  Lennart Karlsson,et al.  Defining 'Functional Products' through their constituents , 2015 .

[26]  Pekka Siltanen,et al.  Web-based 3D Mediated Communication in Manufacturing Industry , 2012, ISPE CE.

[27]  Marco Bertoni,et al.  Using 3D CAD Models for Value Visualization: An Approach with SIEMENS NX HD3D Visual Reporting , 2014 .

[28]  Roger Jianxin Jiao,et al.  Product family design and platform-based product development: a state-of-the-art review , 2007, J. Intell. Manuf..

[29]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development , 1994 .

[30]  Chun Lei Li,et al.  Supporting multiple engineering viewpoints in computer-aided design using ontology-based annotations , 2013 .

[31]  Rob H. Bracewell,et al.  Capturing an integrated design information space with a diagram-based approach , 2013 .

[32]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Exploring knowledge and information needs in engineering from the past and for the future – results from a survey , 2010 .

[33]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[34]  Jeremy Busby.  The Problem with Design Reuse: An Investigation into Outcomes and Antecedents , 1999 .

[35]  Maarten Sierhuis,et al.  Hypermedia Support for Argumentation-Based Rationale , 2006 .

[36]  Fredrik Elgh,et al.  A Design Automation System Supporting Design for Cost : Underlying Method, System Applicability and User Experiences , 2005 .

[37]  Alain Bernard,et al.  The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems , 2013, Comput. Aided Des..

[38]  Morteza Poorkiany,et al.  SUPPORTING TRACEABILITY OF DESIGN RATIONALE IN AN AUTOMATED ENGINEER-TO-ORDER BUSINESS MODEL , 2012 .

[39]  Ram D. Sriram,et al.  The Role of Knowledge in Next-generation Product Development Systems , 2001, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[40]  Ralph Bergmann,et al.  Experience Management: Foundations, Development Methodology, and Internet-Based Applications , 2002 .

[41]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[42]  Judith .QBell Judith Bell,et al.  Doing Your Research Project: A Guide for First-time Researchers , 1993 .

[43]  Manuel Contero,et al.  Implementation Challenges of Annotated 3D Models in Collaborative Design Environments , 2014, CDVE.