Blinking statistics and molecular counting in direct stochastic reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM)

MOTIVATION Many recent advancements in single molecule localisation microscopy exploit the stochastic photo-switching of fluorophores to reveal complex cellular structures beyond the classical diffraction limit. However, this same stochasticity makes counting the number of molecules to high precision extremely challenging, preventing key insight into the cellular structures and processes under observation. RESULTS Modelling the photo-switching behaviour of a fluorophore as an unobserved continuous time Markov process transitioning between a single fluorescent and multiple dark states, and fully mitigating for missed blinks and false positives, we present a method for computing the exact probability distribution for the number of observed localisations from a single photo-switching fluorophore. This is then extended to provide the probability distribution for the number of localisations in a dSTORM experiment involving an arbitrary number of molecules. We demonstrate that when training data is available to estimate photoswitching rates, the unknown number of molecules can be accurately recovered from the posterior mode of the number of molecules given the number of localisations. Finally, we demonstrate the method on experimental data by quantifying the number of adapter protein Linker for Activation of T cells (LAT) on the cell surface of the T cell immunological synapse. AVAILABILITY Software available at https://github.com/lp1611/mol_count_dstorm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

[1]  C. Bustamante,et al.  Counting single photoactivatable fluorescent molecules by photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM) , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  M. Heilemann,et al.  Subdiffraction-resolution fluorescence imaging with conventional fluorescent probes. , 2008, Angewandte Chemie.

[3]  J. Ries,et al.  Optimizing imaging speed and excitation intensity for single molecule localization microscopy , 2020, Nature Methods.

[4]  Roland Eils,et al.  One, two or three? Probing the stoichiometry of membrane proteins by single-molecule localization microscopy , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Rob J Hyndman,et al.  Computing and Graphing Highest Density Regions , 1996 .

[6]  Anish V. Abraham,et al.  Resolution limit of image analysis algorithms , 2019, Nature Communications.

[7]  Benjamin Recht,et al.  DeepLoco: Fast 3D Localization Microscopy Using Neural Networks , 2018, bioRxiv.

[8]  Steve Pressé,et al.  Stochastic approach to the molecular counting problem in superresolution microscopy , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  P. Gönczy,et al.  Resolution Doubling in 3D-STORM Imaging through Improved Buffers , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  Keith A. Lidke,et al.  Quantitative Localization Microscopy: Effects of Photophysics and Labeling Stoichiometry , 2015, PloS one.

[11]  N. Coussens,et al.  The Linker for Activation of T Cells (LAT) Signaling Hub: From Signaling Complexes to Microclusters* , 2015, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  Kyle M. Douglass,et al.  Super-resolution imaging of multiple cells by optimised flat-field epi-illumination , 2016, Nature Photonics.

[13]  D. Nino,et al.  Molecular Counting with Localization Microscopy: A Bayesian Estimate Based on Fluorophore Statistics. , 2017, Biophysical Journal.

[14]  Mark Bates,et al.  Evaluation of fluorophores for optimal performance in localization-based super-resolution imaging , 2011, Nature Methods.

[15]  Michael D. Mason,et al.  Ultra-high resolution imaging by fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Sebastian van de Linde,et al.  How to switch a fluorophore: from undesired blinking to controlled photoswitching. , 2014, Chemical Society reviews.

[17]  Zhiping Lin,et al.  Quantitative Aspects of Single-Molecule Microscopy: Information-theoretic analysis of single-molecule data , 2015, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[18]  Sjoerd Stallinga,et al.  Measuring image resolution in optical nanoscopy , 2013, Nature Methods.

[19]  Ricardo Henriques,et al.  A HIDDEN MARKOV MODEL APPROACH TO CHARACTERIZING THE PHOTO-SWITCHING BEHAVIOR OF FLUOROPHORES. , 2019, The annals of applied statistics.

[20]  Michael J Rust,et al.  Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) , 2006, Nature Methods.

[21]  Suliana Manley,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of software packages for single-molecule localization microscopy , 2015, Nature Methods.

[22]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Imaging Intracellular Fluorescent Proteins at Nanometer Resolution , 2006, Science.

[23]  Fang Huang,et al.  Quantifying and Optimizing Single-Molecule Switching Nanoscopy at High Speeds , 2015, PloS one.

[24]  Taekjip Ha,et al.  Photophysics of fluorescent probes for single-molecule biophysics and super-resolution imaging. , 2012, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[25]  D. Haltrich,et al.  Enzymatic Oxygen Scavenging for Photostability without pH Drop in Single-Molecule Experiments , 2012, ACS nano.