Concentrations of Levofloxacin, Ofloxacin, and Ciprofloxacin in Human Corneal Stromal Tissue and Aqueous Humor After Topical Administration

Objective: To evaluate the penetration of commercially available levofloxacin 0.5%, ofloxacin 0.3%, and ciprofloxacin 0.3% topical ophthalmic solutions in human corneal stromal and aqueous humor tissues. Methods: A total of 67 patients scheduled to undergo penetrating keratoplasty for treatment of stromal scar or dystrophy, keratoconus, pellucid marginal degeneration, or endothelial disease were enrolled in this prospective, double-blind, 3-center study. To be considered for inclusion, patients had to have an intact corneal epithelium and minimal or no corneal edema (pachymetry < 650 μm). After informed consent was obtained, patients were randomized to receive 1 drop of levofloxacin 0.5%, ofloxacin 0.3%, or ciprofloxacin 0.3% topical ophthalmic solution at approximately 15 and 10 minutes before surgery. Approximately 0.1 mL of aqueous fluid was aspirated by paracentesis through the trephination wound at the onset of surgery, followed by excision of the affected cornea and removal of its epithelium. Specimens were stored frozen at −70°C until assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Results: All 3 fluoroquinolones were well tolerated. A total of 65 corneas and 59 aqueous fluid samples were obtained and assayed. The mean ± standard deviation corneal concentrations of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and levofloxacin following a 2-drop administration were 9.92 ± 10.99 μg/g (n = 18), 10.77 ± 5.90 μg/g (n = 23), and 18.23 ± 20.51 μg/g (n = 24), respectively. Although corneal stromal levels were highest in the levofloxacin group, the high degree of interpatient variability prevented demonstration of statistically significant differences when compared with ofloxacin (P = 0.377). In contrast, levofloxacin concentrations were approximately twice as high as ciprofloxacin, and this difference reached statistical significance (P = 0.014). The corresponding aqueous humor concentrations of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and levofloxacin were 0.135 ± 0.231 μg/mL (n = 15), 0.135 ± 0.111 μg/mL (n = 20), and 0.372 ± 0.546 μg/mL (n = 24, P < 0.001 versus ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin). Conclusion: The topical administration of all 3 agents was well tolerated in patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty. Two drops of levofloxacin 0.5% solution results in a 1.7- to 2.7-fold greater penetration into human corneal stromal and aqueous humor tissues than ofloxacin 0.3% or ciprofloxacin 0.3%. The mean intracorneal concentrations of all three agents following 2 drops exceeds the MIC90 for the majority of pathogens causing bacterial keratitis. Topical levofloxacin appears to offer pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic advantages over ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin in terms of enhanced transcorneal penetration; however, clinical comparative trials are needed to confirm these relative advantages.

[1]  M. Yamada,et al.  Corneal Stromal Penetration Of Topically Applied Levofloxacin, Norfloxacin, And Lomefloxacin In The Same Human Eyes , 2002 .

[2]  K. Sowinski,et al.  Separation of levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, trovafloxacin and cinoxacin by high-performance liquid chromatography: application to levofloxacin determination in human plasma. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[3]  R. Eiferman In vitro pharmacodynamics of ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin against common ocular pathogens. , 2001, Cornea.

[4]  M. Trousdale,et al.  In Vitro Susceptibilities of Bacterial Ocular Isolates to Fluoroquinolones , 2001, Cornea.

[5]  P. McDonnell,et al.  Bacteriologic and Clinical Efficacy of Ofloxacin 0.3% Versus Ciprofloxacin 0.3% Ophthalmic Solutions in the Treatment of Patients with Culture-positive Bacterial Keratitis , 2001, Cornea.

[6]  S. Kaye,et al.  Fluoroquinolones , 2012, Drugs.

[7]  H. Taylor,et al.  Fluoroquinolone and fortified antibiotics for treating bacterial corneal ulcers , 2000, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  A. Panda,et al.  Comparison of topical 0.3% ofloxacin with fortified tobramycin plus cefazolin in the treatment of bacterial keratitis , 1999, Eye.

[9]  K Kawazu,et al.  Characterization of the Carrier‐mediated Transport of Levofloxacin, a Fluoroquinolone Antimicrobial Agent, in Rabbit Cornea , 1999, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[10]  K. Kawazu,et al.  Cultured Rabbit Corneal Epithelium Elicits Levofloxacin Absorption and Secretion , 1999, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[11]  A. Bozkurt,et al.  Human aqueous and vitreous humour levels of ciprofloxacin following oral and topical administration , 1999, Eye.

[12]  U. Yasar,et al.  Penetration of ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin in aqueous humor after topical administration. , 1999, Ophthalmic surgery and lasers.

[13]  Hindukush O'Jha Comparison of Ciprofloxacin Opthalmic Solution 0.3% to Fortified Tobramycin-Cefazolin in Treating Bacterial Corneal Ulcers , 1999 .

[14]  M. Garrison,et al.  Levofloxacin: a therapeutic review. , 1998, Clinical therapeutics.

[15]  C. Felix,et al.  In Vitro Antibiotic Susceptibilities of Ocular Isolates in North and South America , 1998 .

[16]  F. Price,et al.  Corneal tissue levels of topically applied ofloxacin , 1997, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[17]  R. Snyder,et al.  Intracorneal, aqueous humor, and vitreous humor penetration of topical and oral ofloxacin. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.

[18]  I. C. Lloyd,et al.  Ofloxacin monotherapy for the primary treatment of microbial keratitis: a double-masked, randomized, controlled trial with conventional dual therapy. The Ofloxacin Study Group. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[19]  R. Guthoff,et al.  Penetration of ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin and ofloxacin into the aqueous humour of patients by different topical application modes , 1997, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[20]  I. Morrissey,et al.  Mechanism of differential activities of ofloxacin enantiomers , 1996, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.

[21]  D. Fong,et al.  Efficacy of ofloxacin vs cefazolin and tobramycin in the therapy for bacterial keratitis. , 1996, Archives of ophthalmology.

[22]  J. Holmes,et al.  The Kinetics of Anterior Chamber Ofloxacin Penetration , 1996, Cornea.

[23]  M. Maguire,et al.  Efficacy of ofloxacin vs cefazolin and tobramycin in the therapy for bacterial keratitis. Report from the Bacterial Keratitis Study Research Group. , 1995, Archives of ophthalmology.

[24]  J. Diamond,et al.  Topical 0.3% ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, and ofloxacin in treatment of bacterial keratitis: a new method for comparative evaluation of ocular drug penetration. , 1995, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  F. Price,et al.  Corneal Tissue Levels of Topically Applied Ciprofloxacin , 1995, Cornea.

[26]  J. Diamond,et al.  Ocular penetration of topical ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin drops and their effect upon eyelid flora. , 1994, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[27]  R. Snyder,et al.  Penetration of topically applied ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, and ofloxacin into the aqueous humor. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[28]  J. Cowden,et al.  Corneal stromal penetration of topical ciprofloxacin in humans. , 1993, Ophthalmology.

[29]  M. Czejka,et al.  Penetration of norfloxacin into the aqueous humor of the human eye. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[30]  C. Riley,et al.  Aqueous solubilities of some variously substituted quinolone antimicrobials , 1990 .

[31]  T. Summers Infections of the eye. , 1947, The Practitioner.