All-analytical semiclassical theory of spaser performance in a plasmonic nanocavity

Experimental approaches to manipulating light-matter interaction at the nanoscale level have quickly advanced in recent years, leading to the use of surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation (spaser) in plasmonic nanocavities. Yet, a well-understood analytical theory to quantitatively explain certain characteristics of the spaser system has still been lacking and is greatly needed. Here, we develop an all-analytical semiclassical theory to investigate the energy exchange between active materials and fields and the spaser performance in a plasmonic nanocavity. The theory incorporates the four-level atomic rate equations in association with the classical oscillator model for active materials and Maxwell's equations for fields, thus allowing one to uncover the relationship between the characteristics of the spaser (the output power, saturation, and threshold) and the nanocavity parameters (quality factor, mode volume, loss, and spontaneous emission efficiency), atomic parameters (number density, linewidth, and resonant frequency), and external parameters (pumping rate). The semiclassical theory has been employed to analyze previous spaser experiments and shows that using a single gold nanoparticle plasmonic nanocavity to ignite the spaser is very difficult due to its high threshold. The theory can be commonly used in understanding and designing all novel microlaser, nanolaser, and spaser systems.

[1]  Mark I. Stockman,et al.  The spaser as a nanoscale quantum generator and ultrafast amplifier , 2009, 0908.3559.

[2]  Bryan Ellis,et al.  Ultra-low Threshold electrically pumped quantum dot photonic crystal nanocavity laser , 2011, CLEO: 2011 - Laser Science to Photonic Applications.

[3]  Zhixiang Huang,et al.  Theory of pump-probe experiments of metallic metamaterials coupled to a gain medium. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[4]  Soon-Hong Kwon,et al.  Electrically Driven Single-Cell Photonic Crystal Laser , 2004, Science.

[5]  Fei Zhou,et al.  Efficient surface plasmon amplification from gain-assisted gold nanorods. , 2011, Optics letters.

[6]  Fouad Karouta,et al.  Lasing in metal-insulator-metal sub-wavelength plasmonic waveguides. , 2009, Optics express.

[7]  Zhi-Yuan Li,et al.  Nanophotonics in China: Overviews and highlights , 2012 .

[8]  Xiang Zhang,et al.  Room-temperature sub-diffraction-limited plasmon laser by total internal reflection. , 2010, Nature materials.

[9]  K. Tsakmakidis,et al.  Theory of light amplification in active fishnet metamaterials. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[10]  Yeshaiahu Fainman,et al.  Electrically pumped sub-wavelength metallo-dielectric pedestal pillar lasers. , 2011, Optics express.

[11]  Yeshaiahu Fainman,et al.  Room-temperature subwavelength metallo-dielectric lasers , 2010 .

[12]  J. Joannopoulos,et al.  Active materials embedded in photonic crystals and coupled to electromagnetic radiation , 2006 .

[13]  M. Lukin,et al.  Generation of single optical plasmons in metallic nanowires coupled to quantum dots , 2007, Nature.

[14]  Costas M. Soukoulis,et al.  Self-consistent calculations of loss-compensated fishnet metamaterials , 2010, 1008.4956.

[15]  Susumu Noda,et al.  Trapping and emission of photons by a single defect in a photonic bandgap structure , 2000, Nature.

[16]  Yasuhiko Arakawa,et al.  Lasing oscillation in a three-dimensional photonic crystal nanocavity with a complete bandgap , 2011 .

[17]  Yun Ji,et al.  Fluorophore-doped core-multishell spherical plasmonic nanocavities: resonant energy transfer toward a loss compensation. , 2012, ACS nano.

[18]  M. Stockman Nanoplasmonics: past, present, and glimpse into future. , 2011, Optics express.

[19]  M. Notomi,et al.  High-speed ultracompact buried heterostructure photonic-crystal laser with 13 fJ of energy consumed per bit transmitted , 2010 .

[20]  Ming C. Wu,et al.  Subwavelength Metal-optic Semiconductor Nanopatch Lasers References and Links , 2022 .

[21]  Jacob B Khurgin,et al.  Injection pumped single mode surface plasmon generators: threshold, linewidth, and coherence. , 2012, Optics express.

[22]  Jiang,et al.  Time dependent theory for random lasers , 2000, Physical review letters.

[23]  D. Bergman,et al.  Surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation: quantum generation of coherent surface plasmons in nanosystems. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[24]  X. Zhong,et al.  Plasmon enhanced light amplification in metal–insulator–metal waveguides with gain , 2012 .

[25]  Hakan E. Tureci,et al.  Self-consistent multimode lasing theory for complex or random lasing media (17 pages) , 2006 .

[26]  Ortwin Hess,et al.  Overcoming losses with gain in a negative refractive index metamaterial. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[27]  Li Ge,et al.  Steady-state ab initio laser theory for N-level lasers. , 2011, Optics express.

[28]  Pierre Berini,et al.  Surface plasmon–polariton amplifiers and lasers , 2011, Nature Photonics.

[29]  C. Z. Ning,et al.  Giant modal gain, amplified surface plasmon-polariton propagation, and slowing down of energy velocity in a metal-semiconductor-metal structure , 2009 .

[30]  Dirk Englund,et al.  Ultrafast photonic crystal nanocavity laser , 2006 .

[31]  V. Shalaev,et al.  Demonstration of a spaser-based nanolaser , 2009, Nature.

[32]  Younan Xia,et al.  Metal nanoparticles with gain toward single-molecule detection by surface-enhanced Raman scattering. , 2010, Nano letters.

[33]  K. Vahala Optical microcavities , 2003, Nature.