Phenotypic diversity in autosomal-dominant cone-rod dystrophy elucidated by adaptive optics retinal imaging

Purpose Several genes causing autosomal-dominant cone-rod dystrophy (AD-CRD) have been identified. However, the mechanisms by which genetic mutations lead to cellular loss in human disease remain poorly understood. Here we combine genotyping with high-resolution adaptive optics retinal imaging to elucidate the retinal phenotype at a cellular level in patients with AD-CRD harbouring a defect in the GUCA1A gene. Methods Nine affected members of a four-generation AD-CRD pedigree and three unaffected first-degree relatives underwent clinical examinations including visual acuity, fundus examination, Goldmann perimetry, spectral domain optical coherence tomography and electroretinography. Genome-wide scan followed by bidirectional sequencing was performed on all affected participants. High-resolution imaging using a custom adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope (AOSLO) was performed for selected participants. Results Clinical evaluations showed a range of disease severity from normal fundus appearance in teenaged patients to pronounced macular atrophy in older patients. Molecular genetic testing showed a mutation in in GUCA1A segregating with disease. AOSLO imaging revealed that of the two teenage patients with mild disease, one had severe disruption of the photoreceptor mosaic while the other had a normal cone mosaic. Conclusions AOSLO imaging demonstrated variability in the pattern of cone and rod cell loss between two teenage cousins with early AD-CRD, who had similar clinical features and had the identical disease-causing mutation in GUCA1A. This finding suggests that a mutation in GUCA1A does not lead to the same degree of AD-CRD in all patients. Modifying factors may mitigate or augment disease severity, leading to different retinal cellular phenotypes.

[1]  D. Hunt,et al.  Guanylate cyclases and associated activator proteins in retinal disease , 2009, Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry.

[2]  G. Darlington,et al.  Isolation of DNA from biological specimens without extraction with phenol. , 1985, Clinical chemistry.

[3]  A. Dubra,et al.  Photoreceptor structure and function in patients with congenital achromatopsia. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  G. Lathrop,et al.  Easy calculations of lod scores and genetic risks on small computers. , 1984, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  T. Dryja,et al.  Digenic retinitis pigmentosa due to mutations at the unlinked peripherin/RDS and ROM1 loci. , 1994, Science.

[6]  Katherine E. Talcott,et al.  Longitudinal study of cone photoreceptors during retinal degeneration and in response to ciliary neurotrophic factor treatment. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Human photoreceptor topography , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  P. Gouras,et al.  Progressive cone degeneration, dominantly inherited. , 1968, Archives of ophthalmology.

[9]  Toco Y P Chui,et al.  Variation of cone photoreceptor packing density with retinal eccentricity and age. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  E. Berson,et al.  Histopathologic and immunohistochemical study of dominant cone degeneration. , 1998, American journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  Jessica I. Wolfing,et al.  High resolution retinal imaging of cone-rod dystrophy , 2004 .

[12]  Isabelle Bloch,et al.  The Negative Cone Mosaic: A New Manifestation of the Optical Stiles-Crawford Effect in Normal Eyes. , 2015, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  Jessica I. Wolfing,et al.  High-resolution retinal imaging of cone-rod dystrophy. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[14]  T. Dryja,et al.  A novel mutation (I143NT) in guanylate cyclase-activating protein 1 (GCAP1) associated with autosomal dominant cone degeneration. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  Christopher S. Langlo,et al.  In vivo imaging of human cone photoreceptor inner segments. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  T. Hebert,et al.  Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. , 2002, Optics express.

[17]  David Williams,et al.  In vivo imaging of the human rod photoreceptor mosaic. , 2004, Optics letters.

[18]  Alfredo Dubra,et al.  Registration of 2D Images from Fast Scanning Ophthalmic Instruments , 2010, WBIR.

[19]  A. Swaroop,et al.  High-resolution imaging with adaptive optics in patients with inherited retinal degeneration. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  A. Roorda,et al.  Observation of cone and rod photoreceptors in normal subjects and patients using a new generation adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope , 2011, Biomedical optics express.

[21]  David Williams,et al.  Fluorescence adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope for detection of reduced cones and hypoautofluorescent spots in fundus albipunctatus. , 2014, JAMA ophthalmology.

[22]  David Williams,et al.  Noninvasive imaging of the human rod photoreceptor mosaic using a confocal adaptive optics scanning ophthalmoscope , 2011, Biomedical optics express.

[23]  David Williams,et al.  Functional photoreceptor loss revealed with adaptive optics: an alternate cause of color blindness. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  A. Bird,et al.  A mutation in guanylate cyclase activator 1A (GUCA1A) in an autosomal dominant cone dystrophy pedigree mapping to a new locus on chromosome 6p21.1. , 1998, Human molecular genetics.

[25]  V. Sheffield,et al.  Clinical features associated with mutations in the chromosome 1 open-angle glaucoma gene (GLC1A) , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  A A Schäffer,et al.  Avoiding recomputation in linkage analysis. , 1994, Human heredity.

[27]  A A Schäffer,et al.  Faster sequential genetic linkage computations. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[28]  E. Stone Finding and interpreting genetic variations that are important to ophthalmologists. , 2003, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[29]  David R Williams,et al.  Cone and rod loss in Stargardt disease revealed by adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy. , 2015, JAMA ophthalmology.