Development and Validation of Open-Source Activity Intensity Count and Activity Intensity Classification Algorithms from Raw Acceleration Signals of Wearable Sensors

Background: A popular outcome in rehabilitation studies is the activity intensity count, which is typically measured from commercially available accelerometers. However, the algorithms are not openly available, which impairs long-term follow-ups and restricts the potential to adapt the algorithms for pathological populations. The objectives of this research are to design and validate open-source algorithms for activity intensity quantification and classification. Methods: Two versions of a quantification algorithm are proposed (fixed [FB] and modifiable bandwidth [MB]) along with two versions of a classification algorithm (discrete [DM] vs. continuous methods [CM]). The results of these algorithms were compared to those of a commercial activity intensity count solution (ActiLife) with datasets from four activities (n = 24 participants). Results: The FB and MB algorithms gave similar results as ActiLife (r > 0.96). The DM algorithm is similar to a ActiLife (r ≥ 0.99). The CM algorithm differs (r ≥ 0.89) but is more precise. Conclusion: The combination of the FB algorithm with the DM results is a solution close to that of ActiLife. However, the MB version remains valid while being more adaptable, and the CM is more precise. This paper proposes an open-source alternative for rehabilitation that is compatible with several wearable devices and not dependent on manufacturer commercial decisions.

[1]  F. Mitchell,et al.  Patterns of objectively measured sedentary behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities. , 2019, Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID.

[2]  Dongni Johansson,et al.  Wearable sensors for clinical applications in epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease, and stroke: a mixed-methods systematic review , 2018, Journal of Neurology.

[3]  G. Cioni,et al.  Assessment of upper limb use in children with typical development and neurodevelopmental disorders by inertial sensors: a systematic review , 2018, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[4]  JAN CHRISTIAN BRØND,et al.  Generating ActiGraph Counts from Raw Acceleration Recorded by an Alternative Monitor , 2017, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  Ulf Ekelund,et al.  Sedentary behavior compensation to 1‐year exercise RCT in patients with type 2 diabetes , 2020, Translational Sports Medicine.

[6]  John P. Sullivan,et al.  A Critical Review of Consumer Wearables, Mobile Applications, and Equipment for Providing Biofeedback, Monitoring Stress, and Sleep in Physically Active Populations , 2018, Front. Physiol..

[7]  Andreas V Larentzakis,et al.  Can Wearable Devices Accurately Measure Heart Rate Variability? A Systematic Review , 2018, Folia medica.

[8]  Joseph Hamill,et al.  Time Series Analysis in Biomechanics , 2017 .

[9]  M. Tremblay,et al.  A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review , 2008, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[10]  Gareth P. Bailey,et al.  Investigation of Sensor Parameters for Kinematic Assessment of Steady State Running Using Foot Mounted IMUs , 2014, icSPORTS.

[11]  Alexandre Campeau-Lecours,et al.  Development and Validation of a Data Fusion Algorithm with Low-Cost Inertial Measurement Units to Analyze Shoulder Movements in Manual Workers , 2020, ArXiv.

[12]  Alexandre Campeau-Lecours,et al.  Validity and Reliability of Wearable Sensors for Joint Angle Estimation: A Systematic Review , 2019, Sensors.

[13]  Ute Bültmann,et al.  Implementing sensor technology applications for workplace health promotion: a needs assessment among workers with physically demanding work , 2019, BMC Public Health.

[14]  R. Roos,et al.  A new approach in the assessment of motor activity in Parkinson's disease. , 1991, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[15]  Paolo Bonato,et al.  Advances in wearable technology and its medical applications , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[16]  J. Jürimäe,et al.  Physical fitness and physical activity of 6-7-year-old children according to weight status and sports participation , 2019, PloS one.

[17]  Edgar Brunner,et al.  Nonparametric analysis of longitudinal data in factorial experiments , 2012 .

[18]  Antonio M. López,et al.  Accelerometry-Based Distance Estimation for Ambulatory Human Motion Analysis , 2018, Sensors.

[19]  Conor J Walsh,et al.  Wearable Movement Sensors for Rehabilitation: A Focused Review of Technological and Clinical Advances , 2018, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[20]  Youngwon Kim,et al.  Associations of School Day Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity With Gross Motor Skills: Use of Compositional Data Analysis , 2019, Journal of physical activity & health.

[21]  Scott E. Crouter,et al.  Step Counting: A Review of Measurement Considerations and Health-Related Applications , 2016, Sports Medicine.

[22]  Dinesh John,et al.  Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. , 2011, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[23]  M. Mukaka,et al.  Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. , 2012, Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi.

[24]  MH Granat,et al.  The application of air bag technology: An objective clinical measure of involuntary muscle spasm , 1999, Spinal Cord.

[25]  Maura Casadio,et al.  Evaluating upper limb impairments in multiple sclerosis by exposure to different mechanical environments , 2018, Scientific Reports.