Random self‐similar river networks and derivations of generalized Horton Laws in terms of statistical simple scaling

Recent data analyses of a dozen or so large networks support the presence of simple scaling in the probability distributions of many topologic, geometric, and hydraulic-geometric variables. We have labeled them “generalized Horton laws” in contrast to traditional Horton laws which are stated only in terms of means. These data sets also show that Horton's bifurcation ratios are significantly larger than 4, which can not be predicted by the well-known random model. Motivated by the need to understand these data analyses of large river networks within a common theoretical framework, a new class of models with statistically self-similar network topology is introduced. The network construction process can be viewed as a statistical generalization of the type of a recursive process which generates many fractal geometrical objects. Unlike the well-known random model, our random channel networks do not belong to the class of binary Galton-Watson stochastic branching processes. The generalized Horton laws are predicted in the limit of large Horton-Strahler order as a scale parameter for a subclass of random self-similar network models. A derivation of Horton's law of stream numbers as a consequence of the simple scaling of distributions of basin magnitude gives it a new theoretical significance. A further subclass also exhibits Tokunga self-similarity, which is an average property of the side tributary structure in river networks. Comparisons with empirical observations for three large basins analyzed here show that the generalized Horton laws are well predicted by this new class of random self-similar network models, and analytically predicted relationships between topologic and geometric Horton ratios are also seen in data.

[1]  Rabi Bhattacharya,et al.  Stochastic processes with applications , 1990 .

[2]  Edward C. Waymire,et al.  A Large Deviation Rate and Central Limit Theorem for Horton Ratios , 1991, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[3]  Edward C. Waymire,et al.  A self-similar invariance of critical binary Galton-Watson trees , 2000 .

[4]  D. Hilbert Ueber die stetige Abbildung einer Line auf ein Flächenstück , 1891 .

[5]  A. Lindenmayer Mathematical models for cellular interactions in development. I. Filaments with one-sided inputs. , 1968, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  A. Lindenmayer Mathematical models for cellular interactions in development. II. Simple and branching filaments with two-sided inputs. , 1968, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  E. Tokunaga The composition of drainage network in Toyohira River Basin and valuation of Horton's first law , 1966 .

[8]  V. Gupta,et al.  Statistical self-similarity in river networks parameterized by elevation , 1989 .

[9]  R. Rosso,et al.  On the fractal dimension of stream networks , 1989 .

[10]  R. L. Shreve Statistical Law of Stream Numbers , 1966, The Journal of Geology.

[11]  Garrison Sposito,et al.  Scale Dependence and Scale Invariance in Hydrology , 1998 .

[12]  Przemyslaw Prusinkiewicz,et al.  The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants , 1990, The Virtual Laboratory.

[13]  Sheldon M. Ross Introduction to Probability Models. , 1995 .

[14]  B. Eckhardt,et al.  Power law distribution of discharge in ideal networks , 1994 .

[15]  Kai Lai Chung,et al.  A Course in Probability Theory , 1949 .

[16]  Knut Jørgen Måløy,et al.  Self-similarity and structure of DLA and viscous fingering clusters , 1989 .

[17]  R. Horton EROSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF STREAMS AND THEIR DRAINAGE BASINS; HYDROPHYSICAL APPROACH TO QUANTITATIVE MORPHOLOGY , 1945 .

[18]  G. Peano Sur une courbe, qui remplit toute une aire plane , 1890 .

[19]  S. Peckham,et al.  A reformulation of Horton's Laws for large river networks in terms of statistical self‐similarity , 1999 .

[20]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  Scaling and Elevation in River Networks , 1989 .

[21]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  The fractal nature of river networks , 1988 .

[22]  B. Mandelbrot Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[23]  Seth Andrew Veitzer A theoretical framework for understanding river networks: Connecting process, geometry and topology across many scales , 1999 .

[24]  T. E. Harris,et al.  The Theory of Branching Processes. , 1963 .

[25]  V. Gupta,et al.  On the formulation of an analytical approach to hydrologic response and similarity at the basin scale , 1983 .

[26]  David G. Tarboton,et al.  Fractal River Networks , 2001 .

[27]  V. Gupta,et al.  SOME MATHEMATICAL ASPECTS OF RAINFALL, LANDFORMS, AND FLOODS , 1998 .

[28]  W. J. Conover,et al.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics , 1972 .

[29]  Eiji Tokunaga,et al.  Consideration on the composition of drainage networks and their evolution , 1978 .

[30]  R. L. Shreve Infinite Topologically Random Channel Networks , 1967, The Journal of Geology.

[31]  B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Directed recursion models for fractal growth , 1989 .

[32]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Fractal River Basins: Chance and Self-Organization , 1997 .

[33]  R. A. Groeneveld,et al.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics (2nd ed). , 1981 .

[34]  V. Gupta,et al.  Scale Dependence and Scale Invariance in Hydrology: Spatial Variability and Scale Invariance in Hydrologic Regionalization , 1998 .

[35]  S. Peckham New Results for Self‐Similar Trees with Applications to River Networks , 1995 .

[36]  Oscar J. Mesa,et al.  On the main channel length‐area relationship for channel networks , 1987 .

[37]  J. V. Bradley Distribution-Free Statistical Tests , 1968 .