Evaluation of aerial spray technologies for adult mosquito control applications

Abstract : Spray droplet size has long been recognized as an important variable that applicators of vector control sprays must be aware of to make the most effective spray applications. Researchers and applicators have several different techniques available to assess spray droplet size from spray nozzles. The objective of this study was to compare the droplet size spectrum produced by three nozzles commonly used in vector control in a high-speed wind tunnel, when characterized using three different laser-based droplet size measurement systems. Three droplet sizing systems: Malvern Spraytec laser diffraction, Sympatec HELOS laser diffraction, and TSI Phase Doppler Particle Analyzer (PDPA), were simultaneously operated, but under different operating conditions, to measure the spray droplet size-spectra for three spray nozzles. The three atomizers: a TeeJet 8001E even flat fan nozzle, a BETE PJ high pressure fog nozzles, and a Micronair AU5000 rotary atomizer were evaluated in a high speed wind tunnel at airspeeds of 53 and 62 m/s (120 and 140 mph). Based on the results of this work, only the BETE PJ high pressure fog nozzles met the label requirements for both Fyfanon and Anvil . While the other nozzle might met the Dv0.5 (VMD volume median diameter) requirement for Fyfanon , the resulting Dv0.9 values exceeded labeled size restrictions. When applying Anvil with the BETE PJ high pressure fog nozzles, it is important to use the smaller two orifice sizes. The larger sizes tended to result in Dv0.9 values that exceeded label recommendations.

[1]  J S Clayton,et al.  Aerial application for control of public health pests , 2002 .

[2]  W. Reisen,et al.  DEPOSITION OF PYRETHRINS AND PIPERONYL BUTOXIDE FOLLOWING AERIAL ULTRA-LOW VOLUME APPLICATIONS IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA , 2007, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[3]  W. C. Hoffmann,et al.  Spray Characterization of Ultra-low–volume Sprayers Typically Used in Vector Control1 , 2009, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[4]  L. S. Alexander,et al.  Aerial adulticiding to control adult mosquitoes in Florida: 10 years of improvements in understanding and technology. , 2008 .

[5]  Daniel E. Martin,et al.  DROPLET-SIZE CHARACTERIZATION OF HANDHELD ATOMIZATION EQUIPMENT TYPICALLY USED IN VECTOR CONTROL1 , 2007, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[6]  Clifford Goodman,et al.  American Society for Testing and Materials , 1988 .

[7]  W. C. Hoffmann,et al.  Spray Characterization of Thermal Fogging Equipment Typically Used in Vector Control1 , 2008, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[8]  I. W. Kirk.  Measurement and Prediction of Atomization Parameters from Fixed-Wing Aircraft Spray Nozzles , 2007 .

[9]  W. C. Hoffmann,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION OF TRUCK-MOUNTED ATOMIZATION EQUIPMENT TYPICALLY USED IN VECTOR CONTROL1 , 2007, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[10]  M. Ledson.  Droplet spectra with thermal foggers , 1992 .

[11]  Milton E. Teske,et al.  Rotary atomizer drop size distribution database , 2005 .