Accommodation in the workplace

Abstract With the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act, employers are now required to provide reasonable accommodations for qualified individuals with disabilities. Although the practice of accommodating applicants or employees is not new, accommodation for disabled individuals has shifted the thinking about accommodation and our perceptions and reactions to such practices. In this article, four major factors that contribute to workplace reactions to accommodation are discussed: (1) rationale for the accommodation, (2) the nature of the accommodation, (3) whether the accommodation is organization, employee or jointly initiated, and (4) the characteristics of the target or person being accommodated. A general framework is presented depicting how these variables combine to influence workplace reactions to accommodation. Research from managerial, social psychological and rehabilitation literatures is reviewed and integrated.

[1]  K. Cook,et al.  Social Exchange Theory , 1989, Theoretical Sociology.

[2]  Rupert Barnes Nacoste.  If Empowerment Is the Goal...: Affirmative Action and social Interaction , 1994 .

[3]  Laura M. Graves,et al.  Effects of Sex-Based Preferential Selection and Discrimination on Job Attitudes , 1994 .

[4]  J. Mills,et al.  Effect upon Desire for Social Interaction with a Physically Disabled Person of Mentioning the Disability in Different Contexts , 1981 .

[5]  T. S. Bateman,et al.  A Social Trap Analysis of the Management of Diversity , 1996 .

[6]  L. Offermann,et al.  Organizations of the future: Changes and challenges. , 1990 .

[7]  Paul R. Burden,et al.  Exceptional and Normal Children's Descriptors of Themselves. , 1983 .

[8]  R. D. Young,et al.  Determinants of self-esteem among labeled adolescents. , 1983, Social psychology quarterly.

[9]  Rupert W. Nacoste.  Selection procedure and responses to affirmative action , 1985 .

[10]  F. Crosby,et al.  Affirmative action in perspective , 1989 .

[11]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  New hire perceptions of their own and their employer's obligations: A study of psychological contracts , 1990 .

[12]  Ann Marie Ryan,et al.  A New Perspective on Preferential Treatment: The Role of Ambiguity and Self-Efficacy , 1998 .

[13]  B. Weiner,et al.  On sin versus sickness. A theory of perceived responsibility and social motivation. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[14]  Dianna L. Stone,et al.  A Model of Factors Affecting the Treatment of Disabled Individuals in Organizations , 1996 .

[15]  A. Pratkanis,et al.  Effects of Preferential and Meritorious Selection on Performance: An Examination of Intuitive and Self-Handicapping Perspectives , 1993 .

[16]  K. Kelley,et al.  Issues, theory, and research in industrial/organizational psychology , 1992 .

[17]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Designing strategic human resources systems , 1984 .

[18]  D. Rousseau,et al.  Fairness and Implied Contract Obligations in Job Terminations: The Role of Remedies, Social Accounts, and the Procedural Justice , 1993 .

[19]  Robert E. Wood,et al.  Supervisor's responses to subordinate poor performance: A test of an attributional model☆ , 1980 .

[20]  Dennis W. Organ,et al.  Social exchange and psychological reactance in a simulated superior-subordinate relationship , 1974 .

[21]  Marlene E. Turner,et al.  The Organizational Behavior Reader , 1991 .

[22]  Luis T. Garcia,et al.  The effect of affirmative action on attributions about minority group members. , 1981 .

[23]  Nigel Nicholson,et al.  The Absence Culture and Psychological Contract—Who's in Control of Absence? , 1985 .

[24]  J. T. Austin,et al.  Effects of shifts in goal origin on goal acceptance and attainment , 1989 .

[25]  R. Keller,et al.  The Handicapped in the Workforce , 1981 .

[26]  Madeline E. Heilman,et al.  Self-derogating consequences of sex-based preferential selection: The moderating role of initial self-confidence , 1990 .

[27]  Michael T. Brannick,et al.  Job analysis, personnel selection, and the ADA , 1992 .

[28]  David A. Kravitz,et al.  Attitudes and beliefs about affirmative action: effects of target and of respondent sex and ethnicity , 1993 .

[29]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  CHANGING OBLIGATIONS AND THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY , 1994 .

[30]  B. Weiner,et al.  An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  M. Clifford,et al.  Social and psychological problems associated with clefts: motivations for cleft palate treatment. , 1986, International dental journal.

[32]  Eugene F. Stone,et al.  Stigmas in organizations : race, handicaps, and physical unattractiveness , 1992 .

[33]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Relationship of Goal Level to Valence and Instrumentality , 1992 .

[34]  Rupert Barnes Nacoste.  Toward a psychological ecology of affirmative action , 1992 .

[35]  D H Harvey,et al.  The self-concept of physically handicapped children and their non-handicapped siblings: an empirical investigation. , 1984, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[36]  F. Tougas.  Who Likes Affirmative Action: Attitudinal Processes Among Men and Women , 1989 .

[37]  J. Brehm,et al.  Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control , 1981 .

[38]  E. E. Jones.  Social stigma: The psychology of marked relationships , 1984 .

[39]  S. Clayton.  Remedies for discrimination: Race, sex and affirmative action , 1992 .

[40]  M. Heilman,et al.  Affirmative action, negative reaction? Some moderating conditions , 1984 .

[41]  M. Heilman,et al.  When Similarity Is a Liability: Effects of Sex-Based Preferential Selection on Reactions to Like-Sex and Different-Sex Others , 1993 .

[42]  Harold E. Yuker,et al.  Attitudes toward persons with disabilities , 1988 .

[43]  M. Heilman,et al.  Skirting the competence issue : effects of sex-based preferential selection on task choices of women and men , 1991 .

[44]  M. Heilman,et al.  Presumed incompetent? Stigmatization and affirmative action efforts. , 1992 .

[45]  Peter A. Susser,et al.  Accommodating handicapped workers: The extent of the employer's obligation , 1988 .

[46]  D. Rousseau.  Psychological contracts in organizations : understanding written and unwritten agreements , 1995 .

[47]  F. Gibbons.  A social-psychological perspective on developmental disabilities. , 1985 .

[48]  R. Schalock,et al.  Economics, Industry, and Disability: A Look Ahead , 1989 .

[49]  A. H. Hastorf,et al.  Acknowledgment of handicap as a tactic in social interaction. , 1979, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[50]  M. Heilman.  Affirmative action: Some unintended consequences for working women , 1994 .

[51]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Diligence, Commitment, and Innovation , 1990 .

[52]  H. Kelley,et al.  Attribution theory and research. , 1980, Annual review of psychology.

[53]  Dean B. McFarlin,et al.  Integrating the disabled into the work force: A survey of fortune 500 company attitudes and practices , 1991 .

[54]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  The New Racism , 1991 .

[55]  David B. Greenberger,et al.  Development and Application of a Model of Personal Control in Organizations , 1986 .

[56]  D. Friedman.  Work and Family: The New Strategic Plan , 1992 .

[57]  Clifford R. Schneider,et al.  Attitudes toward the Stigmatized: Some Insights from Recent Research. , 1980 .

[58]  D. Rousseau.  Psychological and implied contracts in organizations , 1989 .

[59]  Russell Cropanzano,et al.  Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management. , 1993 .

[60]  Laurie Larwood,et al.  Attributional Effects of Equal Employment Opportunity , 1995 .

[61]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Aversive Racism and Resistance to Affirmative Action: Perception of Justice Are Not Necessarily Color Blind , 1994 .

[62]  S. Fiske,et al.  Affirmative Action in Theory and Practice: issues of Power, Ambiguity, and Gender Versus Race , 1994 .

[63]  S. Wayne,et al.  Commitment and employee behavior: comparison of affective commitment and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support. , 1993, The Journal of applied psychology.

[64]  K. Deaux,et al.  Explanations of successful performance on sex-linked tasks: What is skill for the male is luck for the female. , 1974 .

[65]  Hierarchy of Preferences toward Disabled Groups: A Reanalysis , 1984, Perceptual and motor skills.

[66]  M. Heilman,et al.  Intentionally Favored, Unintentionally Harmed?: Impact of Sex-Based Preferential Selection on Self-Perceptions and Self-Evaluations , 1987 .

[67]  Rupert W. Nacoste.  Policy Schemas for Affirmative Action , 1994 .

[68]  J. Tringo.  The Hierarchy of Preference Toward Disability Groups , 1970 .

[69]  Effect of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic experiences on self-esteem of handicapped and nonhandicapped students. , 1981, The Journal of psychology.

[70]  G. Northcraft,et al.  Double jeopardy : Resistance to affirmative action from potential beneficiaries , 1983 .

[71]  T. Chacko,et al.  Women and equal employment opportunity: Some unintended effects. , 1982 .

[72]  S. Grover,et al.  WHO APPRECIATES FAMILY‐RESPONSIVE HUMAN RESOURCE POLICIES: THE IMPACT OF FAMILY‐FRIENDLY POLICIES ON THE ORGANIZATIONAL ATTACHMENT OF PARENTS AND NON‐PARENTS , 1995 .

[73]  H. Kelley.  Attribution in social interaction. , 1987 .

[74]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  The perceived cause of work success as a mediator of sex discrimination in organizations , 1978 .

[75]  E. E. Jones.  Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior , 1987 .