Reconceptualizing the Nature of Science for Science Education

Abstract Two fundamental questions about science are relevant for science educators: (a) What is the nature of science? and (b) what aspects of nature of science should be taught and learned? They are fundamental because they pertain to how science gets to be framed as a school subject and determines what aspects of it are worthy of inclusion in school science. This conceptual article re-examines extant notions of nature of science and proposes an expanded version of the Family Resemblance Approach (FRA), originally developed by Irzik and Nola (International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 999–1021, 2014) in which they view science as a cognitive-epistemic and as an institutional-social system. The conceptual basis of the expanded FRA is described and justified in this article based on a detailed account published elsewhere (Erduran and Dagher in Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education: scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories. Springer, Dordrecht, 2014a). The expanded FRA provides a useful framework for organizing science curriculum and instruction and gives rise to generative visual tools that support the implementation of a richer understanding of and about science. The practical implications for this approach have been incorporated into analysis of curriculum policy documents, curriculum implementation resources, textbook analysis and teacher education settings.

[1]  Ngss Lead States.  Next generation science standards : for states, by states , 2013 .

[2]  Gürol Irzik.  Back to Basics A Philosophical Critique of Constructivism , 2000 .

[3]  Merrill B. Hintikka,et al.  Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science , 1987 .

[4]  James B. Conant,et al.  Science and Common Sense. , 1952 .

[5]  Michel Ferrari,et al.  Epistemology and Science Education: Understanding the Evolution Vs , 2010 .

[6]  M. R. Matthews,et al.  Introductory Comments on Philosophy and Constructivism in Science Education , 1997 .

[7]  David Geelan,et al.  Epistemological Anarchy and the Many Forms of Constructivism , 1997 .

[8]  M. Stenmark.  WHAT IS SCIENTISM? , 1997, Religious Studies.

[9]  Valarie L. Akerson,et al.  Relationships among learner characteristics and preservice elementary teachers’ views of nature of science , 2008 .

[10]  William F. McComas,et al.  The nature of science in science education : rationales and strategies , 1998 .

[11]  Peter J. Fensham,et al.  Science for all: A reflective essay , 1985 .

[12]  Philip N. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Imagery, Visualization, and Thinking , 1998 .

[13]  D. Allchin.  Teaching the Nature of Science: Perspectives & Resources , 2013 .

[14]  Science Curriculum Reform on ‘Scientific Literacy for All’ Across National Contexts: Case Studies of Curricula from England & Wales and Hong Kong , 2013 .

[15]  Daniel Lee Kleinman.  Pervasive influence: Intellectual property, industrial history, and university science , 1998 .

[16]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural , 1998 .

[17]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry , 2004 .

[18]  Cathleen C. Loving,et al.  Defining "Science" in a Multicultural World: Implications for Science Education. , 1998 .

[19]  Robert Nola,et al.  A Family Resemblance Approach to the Nature of Science for Science Education , 2011 .

[20]  Peter A. Rubba,et al.  Development of an instrument to assess secondary school students understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge , 1978 .

[21]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Two Views About Explicitly Teaching Nature of Science , 2013 .

[22]  Edward L. Smith,et al.  Development and Validation of the Conceptions of Scientific Theories Test. , 1981 .

[23]  S. Erduran.  Breaking the law: promoting domain-specificity in chemical education in the context of arguing about the periodic law , 2007 .

[24]  M. Arthur.  Economics of Science , 2008 .

[25]  Gürol Irzik.  Introduction: Commercialization of Academic Science and a New Agenda for Science Education , 2013 .

[26]  Norman G. Lederman.  Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research , 1992 .

[27]  M. Bunge,et al.  Foundations of Biophilosophy , 1997, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[28]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  How great is the disagreement about the nature of science: A response to Alters , 1997 .

[29]  S. Erduran,et al.  Laws and Explanations in Biology and Chemistry: Philosophical Perspectives and Educational Implications , 2014 .

[30]  M. R. Matthews.  Science teaching : the role of history and philosophy of science , 1994 .

[31]  W. Sandoval.  Understanding Students' Practical Epistemologies and Their Influence on Learning Through Inquiry , 2005 .

[32]  R. Macleod.  Nature and empire : science and the colonial enterprise , 2000 .

[33]  Hagop A. Yacoubian.  Towards a Philosophically and a Pedagogically Reasonable Nature of Science Curriculum , 2012 .

[34]  William F. McComas,et al.  The Role and Character of the Nature of Science in Science Education , 1998 .

[35]  R. Brandon,et al.  Concepts and Methods in Evolutionary Biology , 1995 .

[36]  M. R. Matthews.  International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching , 2014 .

[37]  Cassandra L. Pinnick.  The Failed Feminist Challenge to ‘Fundamental Epistemology’ , 2005 .

[38]  A. Sayre.  Rosalind Franklin and DNA , 1975 .

[39]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  Visualization in Mathematics, Reading and Science Education , 2010 .

[40]  D. Bleichmar.  Visible Empire: Botanical Expeditions and Visual Culture in the Hispanic Enlightenment , 2012 .

[41]  Miriam Reiner,et al.  Visualization : theory and practice in science education , 2008 .

[42]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  TAKING SCIENCE TO SCHOOL: LEARNING AND TEACHING SCIENCE IN GRADES K-8 , 2007 .

[43]  Learning to teach scientific practices: pedagogical decisions and reflections during a course for pre-service science teachers , 2015 .

[44]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[45]  M. R. Matthews.  Changing the Focus: From Nature of Science (NOS) to Features of Science (FOS) , 2012 .

[46]  R. Nola,et al.  New Directions for Nature of Science Research , 2014 .

[47]  D. Allchin.  Evaluating Knowledge of the Nature of (Whole) Science , 2011 .

[48]  A. Pickering.  Science as practice and culture , 1992 .

[49]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Demarcation in science education: Toward an enhanced view of scientific method , 2011 .

[50]  Sibel Erduran,et al.  Reconceptualizing the nature of science : scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories , 2014 .

[51]  Kathleen E. Metz.  Rethinking what is "developmentally appropriate" from a learning progression perspective: The power and the challenge , 2009 .

[52]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Restructuring Science Education: The Importance of Theories and Their Development , 1990 .

[53]  Julian Hochberg,et al.  Perception and cognition at century's end , 1998 .

[54]  Brian Alters,et al.  Whose nature of science , 1997 .

[55]  John Leach,et al.  UNDERGRADUATE SCIENCE STUDENTS' IMAGES OF SCIENCE , 1999 .

[56]  S. Glennan,et al.  The nature of science: A perspective from the philosophy of science , 1999 .

[57]  Michael P. Clough,et al.  The Nature of Science in Science Education: An Introduction , 1998 .

[58]  Andrew Elby,et al.  Epistemological resources and framing: a cognitive framework for helping teachers interpret and respond to their students' epistemologies , 2010 .

[59]  Mary Ratcliffe,et al.  What “ideas‐about‐science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community , 2003 .

[60]  A. Ahlgren,et al.  Science for all Americans , 1990 .

[61]  R. Driver,et al.  Young people's images of science , 1996 .

[62]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[63]  J. Krajcik,et al.  Designing Educative Curriculum Materials to Promote Teacher Learning , 2005 .

[64]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  A series of misrepresentations: A response to Allchin's whole approach to assessing nature of science understandings , 2012 .

[65]  L. E. Klopfer,et al.  The evaluation of specific educational innovations , 1963 .

[66]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Reconsidering the Character and Role of Inquiry in School Science: Analysis of a Conference , 2007 .

[67]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science , 2002 .

[68]  F. Abd‐El‐Khalick.  Examining the Sources for our Understandings about Science: Enduring conflations and critical issues in research on nature of science in science education , 2012 .

[69]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature , 2000 .

[70]  S. Erduran,et al.  Regaining focus in Irish Junior Cycle Science: potential new directions for curriculum and assessment on Nature of Science , 2014 .

[71]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .

[72]  Yuen-Hsien Tseng,et al.  Trends of Science Education Research: An Automatic Content Analysis , 2010 .

[73]  J. Olson,et al.  The Nature of Science in International Science Education Standards Documents , 1998 .

[74]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Consensus: Expanding The Scientific Method and School Science , 2008 .

[75]  George Antonouris,et al.  Science Education Notes. , 1989 .

[76]  Robert C. Olby,et al.  [Table of Contents to] "The Path to the Double Helix: The Discovery of DNA" , 1994 .

[77]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom , 2001 .

[78]  Mekritt E. Kimball.  Understanding the nature of science: A comparison of scientists and science teachers , 1967 .

[79]  E. Keller.  Reflections on Gender and Science , 1985 .

[80]  David Kaiser.  Cold War requisitions, scientific manpower, and the production of American physicists after World War II , 2002 .

[81]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Handbook of Research on Science Education , 2023 .

[82]  J. Worsley.  Enhancing Adolescents' Motivation for Science , 2014 .

[83]  M. Khine.  Advances in nature of science research : concepts and methodologies , 2012 .

[84]  Leopold E. Klopfer,et al.  The teaching of science and the history of science , 1969 .

[85]  G. Aikenhead.  Humanistic Perspectives in the Science Curriculum , 2013 .

[86]  Eric R. Scerri.  Philosophy of Chemistry—A New Interdisciplinary Field? , 2000 .

[87]  Michael Ford,et al.  ‘Grasp of Practice’ as a Reasoning Resource for Inquiry and Nature of Science Understanding , 2008 .