Clinical use of quantitative cardiac perfusion PET: rationale, modalities and possible indications. Position paper of the Cardiovascular Committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)
暂无分享,去创建一个
Oliver Lindner | Riemer H. J. A. Slart | Marcus Hacker | Fabien Hyafil | Alessia Gimelli | Roberto Sciagrà | oNe mediciNe | J. Bucerius | A. Passeri | F. Hyafil | R. Sciagrà | M. Hacker | R. Slart | H. Verberne | A. Gimelli | C. Übleis | O. Lindner | D. Agostini | Denis Agostini | Jan Bucerius | Alessandro Passeri | Hein J. Verberne | Christopher Übleis | on behalf of the Cardiovascular Committee of the Euro Medicine
[1] M. Phelps,et al. Reproducibility of measurements of regional resting and hyperemic myocardial blood flow assessed with PET. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[2] D E Kuhl,et al. Comparison of rubidium-82 positron emission tomography and thallium-201 SPECT imaging for detection of coronary artery disease. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.
[3] S. Kumita,et al. Impact of time-of-flight on qualitative and quantitative analyses of myocardial perfusion PET studies using 13N-ammonia , 2014, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.
[4] R. Slart,et al. Unilateral and Multilateral Congenital Coronary‐Pulmonary Fistulas in Adults: Clinical Presentation, Diagnostic Modalities, and Management With a Brief Review of the Literature , 2014, Clinical cardiology.
[5] Ran Klein,et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve: Technical aspects , 2010, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
[6] M. Pencina,et al. Improved Cardiac Risk Assessment With Noninvasive Measures of Coronary Flow Reserve , 2011, Circulation.
[7] Martin A Lodge,et al. Human Biodistribution and Radiation Dosimetry of 82Rb , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[8] Hans L Hillege,et al. Comparison Between the Prognostic Value of Left Ventricular Function and Myocardial Perfusion Reserve in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[9] M. Lubberink,et al. Hybrid Imaging Using Quantitative H215O PET and CT-Based Coronary Angiography for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[10] Osamu Manabe,et al. Repeatability of Rest and Hyperemic Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements with 82Rb Dynamic PET , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[11] Proceedings of the cardiac PET summit meeting 12 may 2014: Cardiac PET and SPECT instrumentation , 2015, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.
[12] T J Spinks,et al. Generation of myocardial factor images directly from the dynamic oxygen-15-water scan without use of an oxygen-15-carbon monoxide blood-pool scan. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[13] S. Nesterov,et al. PET: Is myocardial flow quantification a clinical reality? , 2012, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.
[14] M. Yacoub,et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction is an early feature of cardiac involvement in patients with Anderson–Fabry disease , 2013, European journal of heart failure.
[15] P. Kolh,et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. , 2015, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[16] O. Rimoldi,et al. Assessment of the long-term reproducibility of baseline and dobutamine-induced myocardial blood flow in patients with stable coronary artery disease. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[17] M. Phelps,et al. A simplified method for quantification of myocardial blood flow using nitrogen-13-ammonia and dynamic PET. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[18] M. D. Di Carli,et al. Quantitative 82Rb PET/CT: Development and Validation of Myocardial Perfusion Database , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[19] Parthiban Arumugam,et al. Impact of point spread function modeling and time-of-flight on myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve measurements for rubidium-82 cardiac PET , 2014, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.
[20] B. Khandheria. Noninvasive imaging. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[21] I. Olivotto,et al. Microvascular Dysfunction, Myocardial Ischemia, and Progression to Heart Failure in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular translational research.
[22] F. Girolami,et al. Relevance of coronary microvascular flow impairment to long-term remodeling and systolic dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[23] Kris Thielemans,et al. Extracting a respiratory signal from raw dynamic PET data that contain tracer kinetics , 2013 .
[24] M. Schwaiger,et al. Assessment of diagnostic performance of quantitative flow measurements in normal subjects and patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease by means of nitrogen-13 ammonia and positron emission tomography. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[25] F. Bengel,et al. Comparison of the myocardial blood flow response to regadenoson and dipyridamole: a quantitative analysis in patients referred for clinical 82Rb myocardial perfusion PET , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[26] W. MacIntyre,et al. Clinical outcome of cardiac patients with negative thallium-201 SPECT and positive rubidium-82 PET myocardial perfusion imaging. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[27] R. Blankstein,et al. Interaction of Impaired Coronary Flow Reserve and Cardiomyocyte Injury on Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Without Overt Coronary Artery Disease , 2015, Circulation.
[28] I. Olivotto,et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction and prognosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.
[29] T. Dill. Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging , 2008, Heart.
[30] A. Sinusas. Does a shortened hyperemia with regadenoson stress pose a concern for quantitative Rb-82 PET imaging? Optimization of regadenoson PET imaging. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[31] G. Hutchins,et al. Interobserver and interstudy variability of myocardial blood flow and flow-reserve measurements with nitrogen 13 ammonia-labeled positron emission tomography , 1995, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
[32] R. Boellaard,et al. Impact of anatomical and functional severity of coronary atherosclerotic plaques on the transmural perfusion gradient: a [15O]H2O PET study. , 2013, European heart journal.
[33] J. De Sutter,et al. Myocardial Perfusion Reserve After a PET-Driven Revascularization Procedure: A Strong Prognostic Factor , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[34] B. Tamarappoo,et al. Clinical decision making with myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. , 2014, Seminars in nuclear medicine.
[35] E. Antman,et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionucl , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[36] D. Neglia,et al. Prognostic Role of Myocardial Blood Flow Impairment in Idiopathic Left Ventricular Dysfunction , 2002, Circulation.
[37] K. Gould,et al. Regadenoson versus dipyridamole hyperemia for cardiac PET imaging. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[38] Georges El Fakhri,et al. Reproducibility and Accuracy of Quantitative Myocardial Blood Flow Assessment with 82Rb PET: Comparison with 13N-Ammonia PET , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[39] M. Javadi,et al. Prediction of Short-Term Cardiovascular Events Using Quantification of Global Myocardial Flow Reserve in Patients Referred for Clinical 82Rb PET Perfusion Imaging , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[40] G. Beller. Underestimation of coronary artery disease with SPECT perfusion imaging , 2008, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
[41] Gerold Porenta,et al. Typical chest pain and normal coronary angiogram: cardiac risk factor analysis versus PET for detection of microvascular disease. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[42] Kathryn A. Williams,et al. Impaired myocardial flow reserve on rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging predicts adverse outcomes in patients assessed for myocardial ischemia. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[43] R. Huesman,et al. Consequences of using a simplified kinetic model for dynamic PET data. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[44] B. Chow,et al. CCS/CAR/CANM/CNCS/CanSCMR joint position statement on advanced noninvasive cardiac imaging using positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and multidetector computed tomographic angiography in the diagnosis and evaluation of ischemic heart disease--executive summary. , 2007, The Canadian journal of cardiology.
[45] A. Lammertsma,et al. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion in the detection of significant coronary artery disease: cutoff values and diagnostic accuracy of quantitative [(15)O]H2O PET imaging. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[46] J. Case,et al. Variability in normal myocardial blood flow measurements: Physiologic, methodologic, or protocol related? , 2015, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.
[47] M Schwaiger,et al. Reversibility of cardiac wall-motion abnormalities predicted by positron tomography. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.
[48] Bradley T. Christian,et al. Quantitative PET with positron emitters that emit prompt gamma rays , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.
[49] R. deKemp,et al. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 82Rb at rest and during peak pharmacological stress in patients referred for myocardial perfusion imaging , 2015, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[50] P. Herrero,et al. Noninvasive quantification of regional myocardial perfusion with rubidium-82 and positron emission tomography. Exploration of a mathematical model. , 1990, Circulation.
[51] J. Case,et al. Regadenoson pharmacologic rubidium-82 PET: A comparison of quantitative perfusion and function to dipyridamole , 2013, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.
[52] F. Crea,et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.
[53] J. Machac,et al. Repeatability of regional myocardial blood flow calculation in 82Rb PET imaging , 2009, BMC medical physics.
[54] Paul Kinahan,et al. Effect of Reconstruction Algorithms on Myocardial Blood Flow Measurement with 13N-Ammonia PET , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[55] Daniel C. Lee,et al. Quantification of absolute myocardial blood flow by magnetic resonance perfusion imaging. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[56] A. Pupi,et al. Validation of pixel-wise parametric mapping of myocardial blood flow with 13NH3 PET in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy , 2015, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[57] R. Wahl,et al. Quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow--clinical and research applications. , 2014, Seminars in nuclear medicine.
[58] Terrence D. Ruddy,et al. Potential utility of rubidium 82 pet quantification in patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease , 2004, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
[59] J. Yap,et al. Assessment of the reproducibility of baseline and hyperemic myocardial blood flow measurements with 15O-labeled water and PET. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[60] Randall C. Thompson,et al. Radiation Dose to Patients From Cardiac Diagnostic Imaging , 2007, Circulation.
[61] Andrew J Einstein,et al. Effects of radiation exposure from cardiac imaging: how good are the data? , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[62] D. Berman,et al. ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Associa , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[63] D E Kuhl,et al. Noninvasive quantification of regional blood flow in the human heart using N-13 ammonia and dynamic positron emission tomographic imaging. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[64] B. Chow,et al. Prognostic Value of Rubidium-82 Positron Emission Tomography in Patients After Heart Transplant , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.
[65] Georges El Fakhri,et al. Quantitative dynamic cardiac 82Rb PET using generalized factor and compartment analyses. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[66] R. Blankstein,et al. Association Between Coronary Vascular Dysfunction and Cardiac Mortality in Patients With and Without Diabetes Mellitus , 2012, Circulation.
[67] Junichi Yamazaki,et al. Guidelines for Clinical Use of Cardiac Nuclear Medicine (JCS 2010) : Digest Version , 2012 .
[68] R. Blankstein,et al. Coronary vascular dysfunction and prognosis in patients with chronic kidney disease. , 2012, JACC Cardiovascular Imaging.
[69] E. Nagel,et al. Quantification of absolute myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease: comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[70] T. Turkington,et al. Estimation of myocardial blood flow for longitudinal studies with 13N-labeled ammonia and positron emission tomography , 1996, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
[71] Josh Klein,et al. A selection of recent original research papers , 2014, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.
[72] Suleman Surti,et al. Benefit of Time-of-Flight in PET: Experimental and Clinical Results , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[73] T. Bateman. Advantages and disadvantages of PET and SPECT in a busy clinical practice , 2012, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.
[74] G. Hutchins,et al. Sampling requirements for dynamic cardiac PET studies using image-derived input functions. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[75] P. Slomka,et al. Quantification of Myocardial Perfusion Reserve Using Dynamic SPECT Imaging in Humans: A Feasibility Study , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[76] S. Nesterov,et al. Comparison of clinical non-commercial tools for automated quantification of myocardial blood flow using oxygen-15-labelled water PET/CT. , 2014, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.
[77] Keiichiro Yoshinaga,et al. What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography? , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[78] D. Neglia,et al. Structural Abnormalities of the Coronary Arterial Wall—in Addition to Luminal Narrowing—Affect Myocardial Blood Flow Reserve , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[79] J. Maddahi,et al. Cardiac PET perfusion tracers: current status and future directions. , 2014, Seminars in nuclear medicine.
[80] A. Gavazzi,et al. Effects of long-term treatment with carvedilol on myocardial blood flow in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy , 2007, Heart.
[81] Nassir Navab,et al. Artifacts from misaligned CT in cardiac perfusion PET/CT studies: frequency, effects, and potential solutions. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[82] M. Lodge,et al. Radiation Dosimetry of 82Rb in Humans Under Pharmacologic Stress , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[83] John O. Prior,et al. Added prognostic value of myocardial blood flow quantitation in rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging. , 2013, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.
[84] J. Simonsen,et al. Quantitative myocardial perfusion by O-15-water PET: individualized vs. standardized vascular territories. , 2015, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.
[85] Russell D Folks,et al. Prompt-gamma compensation in Rb-82 myocardial perfusion 3D PET/CT , 2010, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
[86] S. Moore,et al. Clinical Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT* , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[87] K. Gould,et al. Physiological basis for angina and ST-segment change PET-verified thresholds of quantitative stress myocardial perfusion and coronary flow reserve. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[88] P. Kolh,et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. , 2015, Revista espanola de cardiologia.
[89] John O. Prior,et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow in absolute terms using (82)Rb PET imaging: the RUBY-10 Study. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[90] K. Gould,et al. Does coronary flow trump coronary anatomy? , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[91] R. Blankstein,et al. Quantification of coronary flow reserve in patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy and its association with clinical outcomes. , 2015, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.
[92] Andy Adler,et al. Intra- and inter-operator repeatability of myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve measurements using rubidium-82 pet and a highly automated analysis program , 2010, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
[93] Helmut Baumgartner,et al. ESC / EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization , 2014 .
[94] D. Neglia,et al. Surgical correction of left coronary artery origin from the right coronary artery. , 2013, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[95] Guido Germano,et al. Multisoftware Reproducibility Study of Stress and Rest Myocardial Blood Flow Assessed with 3D Dynamic PET/CT and a 1-Tissue-Compartment Model of 82Rb Kinetics , 2013, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[96] Parthiban Arumugam,et al. Assessment of a protocol for routine simultaneous myocardial blood flow measurement and standard myocardial perfusion imaging with rubidium-82 on a high count rate positron emission tomography system , 2012, Nuclear medicine communications.
[97] R. Blankstein,et al. Detection of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Using Regadenoson Stress and 82Rb PET/CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[98] H. Sipilä,et al. Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Accurately Detects Anatomically and Functionally Significant Coronary Artery Disease , 2010, Circulation.
[99] R. Blankstein,et al. Global Coronary Flow Reserve Is Associated With Adverse Cardiovascular Events Independently of Luminal Angiographic Severity and Modifies the Effect of Early Revascularization , 2015, Circulation.
[100] Michael Fiechter,et al. Diagnostic Value of 13N-Ammonia Myocardial Perfusion PET: Added Value of Myocardial Flow Reserve , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[101] R. Falk,et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction is related to abnormalities in myocardial structure and function in cardiac amyloidosis. , 2014, JACC. Heart failure.
[102] M. Phelps,et al. Influence of Age and Hemodynamics on Myocardial Blood Flow and Flow Reserve , 1993, Circulation.
[103] A. L'Abbate,et al. Coronary vasodilation is impaired in both hypertrophied and nonhypertrophied myocardium of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a study with nitrogen-13 ammonia and positron emission tomography. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[104] Quantitation of the regional blood flow in the interventricular septum using positron emission tomography and nitrogen-13 ammonia , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[105] R. Blankstein,et al. Quantitative relationship between the extent and morphology of coronary atherosclerotic plaque and downstream myocardial perfusion. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[106] R. Kwong,et al. Incremental prognostic value of gated Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical variables and rest LVEF. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[107] Uchechukwu Sampson,et al. Value of vasodilator left ventricular ejection fraction reserve in evaluating the magnitude of myocardium at risk and the extent of angiographic coronary artery disease: a 82Rb PET/CT study. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[108] M E Phelps,et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow using 13N-ammonia and PET: comparison of tracer models. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[109] K. Gould,et al. 3: Quantitation of myocardial blood flow , 2015 .
[110] M E Phelps,et al. Quantitation in Positron Emission Computed Tomography: 6. Effect of Nonuniform Resolution , 1982, Journal of computer assisted tomography.
[111] G. Heller,et al. Proceedings of the ASNC Cardiac PET Summit, 12 May 2014, Baltimore, MD , 2015, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.
[112] Ran Klein,et al. Short-term repeatability of resting myocardial blood flow measurements using rubidium-82 PET imaging , 2012, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.
[113] J. Declerck,et al. Dependency of cardiac rubidium-82 imaging quantitative measures on age, gender, vascular territory, and software in a cardiovascular normal population , 2015, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.
[114] S. Ross,et al. Properties and Mitigation of Edge Artifacts in PSF-Based PET Reconstruction , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.
[115] Ran Klein,et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[116] R. Boellaard,et al. Determinants of coronary microvascular dysfunction in symptomatic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. , 2008, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.
[117] Jeroen J. Bax,et al. Present and future of clinical cardiovascular PET imaging in Europe—a position statement by the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology (ECNC) , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[118] M E Phelps,et al. Relation among stenosis severity, myocardial blood flow, and flow reserve in patients with coronary artery disease. , 1995, Circulation.
[119] D. J. Veldhuisen,et al. Myocardial perfusion reserve in spared myocardium: correlation with infarct size and left ventricular ejection fraction , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[120] V. Murthy,et al. Non-invasive quantification of coronary vascular dysfunction for diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease , 2012, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.
[121] Piotr J. Slomka,et al. Comparison of Clinical Tools for Measurements of Regional Stress and Rest Myocardial Blood Flow Assessed with 13N-Ammonia PET/CT , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[122] Frank M. Bengel,et al. CT-based attenuation correction in 82Rb-myocardial perfusion PET–CT: incidence of misalignment and effect on regional tracer distribution , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[123] Mehrbod S. Javadi,et al. Definition of Vascular Territories on Myocardial Perfusion Images by Integration with True Coronary Anatomy: A Hybrid PET/CT Analysis , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[124] John O. Prior,et al. Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow in Absolute Terms u27sing 82Rb PET Imaging: Results of RUBY-10—a multicenter study comparing ten computer analysis programs , 2014 .
[125] Klaus Schafers,et al. Respiratory gating of cardiac PET data in list-mode acquisition , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[126] Sung-Cheng Huang,et al. Absolute Quantitation of Myocardial Blood Flow in Human Subjects With or Without Myocardial Ischemia Using Dynamic Flurpiridaz F 18 PET , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[127] G. Hutchins,et al. A region of interest strategy for minimizing resolution distortions in quantitative myocardial PET studies. , 1992, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[128] Willi A. Kalender,et al. Dual-source cardiac computed tomography: image quality and dose considerations , 2008, European Radiology.
[129] Benjamin C. Lee,et al. Precision and accuracy of clinical quantification of myocardial blood flow by dynamic PET: A technical perspective , 2015, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.
[130] John O. Prior,et al. Myocardial blood flow quantification by Rb-82 cardiac PET/CT: A detailed reproducibility study between two semi-automatic analysis programs , 2015, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.
[131] M. Schlumberger. Can iodine-131 whole-body scan be replaced by thyroglobulin measurement in the post-surgical follow-up of differentiated thyroid carcinoma? , 1992, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[132] Juhani Knuuti,et al. Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease. Role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging in revascularization decision-making. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[133] A. van Rossum,et al. Feasibility of subendocardial and subepicardial myocardial perfusion measurements in healthy normals with 15O-labeled water and positron emission tomography , 2011, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
[134] G. Fakhri,et al. Quantitative relationship between coronary vasodilator reserve assessed by 82Rb PET imaging and coronary artery stenosis severity , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[135] O Muzik,et al. Validation of nitrogen-13-ammonia tracer kinetic model for quantification of myocardial blood flow using PET. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[136] Oliver Gaemperli,et al. Long-term prognostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography added value of coronary flow reserve. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[137] Michael Kreissl,et al. Positron emission tomography-measured abnormal responses of myocardial blood flow to sympathetic stimulation are associated with the risk of developing cardiovascular events. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[138] M E Phelps,et al. 13N ammonia myocardial imaging at rest and with exercise in normal volunteers. Quantification of absolute myocardial perfusion with dynamic positron emission tomography. , 1989, Circulation.
[139] H. Verberne,et al. Role of risk stratification by SPECT, PET, and hybrid imaging in guiding management of stable patients with ischaemic heart disease: expert panel of the EANM cardiovascular committee and EACVI. , 2015, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.
[140] Tinsu Pan,et al. Frequent Diagnostic Errors in Cardiac PET/CT Due to Misregistration of CT Attenuation and Emission PET Images: A Definitive Analysis of Causes, Consequences, and Corrections , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[141] J. Knuuti,et al. Myocardial perfusion quantitation with 15O-labelled water PET: high reproducibility of the new cardiac analysis software (Carimas™) , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[142] V. Dilsizian,et al. PET-determined hyperemic myocardial blood flow: further progress to clinical application. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[143] Maurizio Conti,et al. Advantages of Improved Time Resolution for TOF PET at Very Low Statistics , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.
[144] M. D. Di Carli,et al. Cardiac PET perfusion: prognosis, risk stratification, and clinical management. , 2014, Seminars in nuclear medicine.
[145] Edward P. Ficaro,et al. Recommendations for reducing radiation exposure in myocardial perfusion imaging , 2010, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
[146] P. Todeschini,et al. Evaluation of time of flight (TOF) and point spread function (PSF) reconstructions in the quantification of myocardial blood flow with 13N ammonia and PET: Comparison among reconstructions (reprojection, OSEM), software (PMOD and CARIMAS) and operators , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).
[147] T. Pearson. New Tools for Coronary Risk Assessment: What Are Their Advantages and Limitations? , 2002, Circulation.
[148] Arman Rahmim,et al. Resolution modeling in PET imaging: Theory, practice, benefits, and pitfalls. , 2013, Medical physics.
[149] A. Fischman,et al. Comparison of positron emission tomography measurement of adenosine-stimulated absolute myocardial blood flow versus relative myocardial tracer content for physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity and location. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[150] Ronald Boellaard,et al. Accuracy of 3-Dimensional Reconstruction Algorithms for the High-Resolution Research Tomograph , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[151] N. Tamaki,et al. Absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow , 2018, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.
[152] J. Votaw,et al. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional cardiac 82Rb PET studies. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[153] T. Murakami,et al. Quantitative myocardial perfusion analysis using multi-row detector CT in acute myocardial infarction , 2012, Heart.
[154] B. Hesse,et al. Hybrid cardiac imaging: SPECT/CT and PET/CT. A joint position statement by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Society of Cardiac Radiology (ESCR) and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology (ECNC) , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[155] Raymond Kwong,et al. Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging with hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[156] Julian C. Matthews,et al. Bias in iterative reconstruction of low-statistics PET data: Benefits of a resolution model , 2009 .
[157] Martin A Lodge,et al. Absolute myocardial flow quantification with 82Rb PET/CT: comparison of different software packages and methods , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[158] A Adler,et al. Precision-controlled elution of a 82Sr/82Rb generator for cardiac perfusion imaging with positron emission tomography , 2007, Physics in Medicine and Biology.
[159] Ran Klein,et al. Does quantification of myocardial flow reserve using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography facilitate detection of multivessel coronary artery disease? , 2012, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.
[160] M J Welch,et al. Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow in vivo with H2150* , 2005 .